PURPOSE: Recent interest in the poroelastic behavior of tissues has led to the development of magnetic resonance poroelastography (MRPE) as an alternative to single-phase MR elastographic image reconstruction. In addition to the elastic parameters (i.e., Lamé's constants) commonly associated with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), MRPE enables estimation of the time-harmonic pore-pressure field induced by external mechanical vibration. METHODS: This study presents numerical simulations that demonstrate the sensitivity of the computed displacement and pore-pressure fields to a priori estimates of the experimentally derived model parameters. In addition, experimental data collected in three poroelastic phantoms are used to assess the quantitative accuracy of MR poroelastographic imaging through comparisons with both quasistatic and dynamic mechanical tests. RESULTS: The results indicate hydraulic conductivity to be the dominant parameter influencing the deformation behavior of poroelastic media under conditions applied during MRE. MRPE estimation of the matrix shear modulus was bracketed by the values determined from independent quasistatic and dynamic mechanical measurements as expected, whereas the contrast ratios for embedded inclusions were quantitatively similar (10%-15% difference between the reconstructed images and the mechanical tests). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the addition of hydraulic conductivity and a viscoelastic solid component as parameters in the reconstruction may be warranted.
PURPOSE: Recent interest in the poroelastic behavior of tissues has led to the development of magnetic resonance poroelastography (MRPE) as an alternative to single-phase MR elastographic image reconstruction. In addition to the elastic parameters (i.e., Lamé's constants) commonly associated with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), MRPE enables estimation of the time-harmonic pore-pressure field induced by external mechanical vibration. METHODS: This study presents numerical simulations that demonstrate the sensitivity of the computed displacement and pore-pressure fields to a priori estimates of the experimentally derived model parameters. In addition, experimental data collected in three poroelastic phantoms are used to assess the quantitative accuracy of MR poroelastographic imaging through comparisons with both quasistatic and dynamic mechanical tests. RESULTS: The results indicate hydraulic conductivity to be the dominant parameter influencing the deformation behavior of poroelastic media under conditions applied during MRE. MRPE estimation of the matrix shear modulus was bracketed by the values determined from independent quasistatic and dynamic mechanical measurements as expected, whereas the contrast ratios for embedded inclusions were quantitatively similar (10%-15% difference between the reconstructed images and the mechanical tests). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the addition of hydraulic conductivity and a viscoelastic solid component as parameters in the reconstruction may be warranted.
Authors: S A Kruse; J A Smith; A J Lawrence; M A Dresner; A Manduca; J F Greenleaf; R L Ehman Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Elijah E W Van Houten; Marvin M Doyley; Francis E Kennedy; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Leah A Platenik; Michael I Miga; David W Roberts; Karen E Lunn; Francis E Kennedy; Alex Hartov; Keith D Paulsen Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Alexia L McKnight; Jennifer L Kugel; Phillip J Rossman; Armando Manduca; Lynn C Hartmann; Richard L Ehman Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: A Manduca; T E Oliphant; M A Dresner; J L Mahowald; S A Kruse; E Amromin; J P Felmlee; J F Greenleaf; R L Ehman Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: M D J McGarry; C L Johnson; B P Sutton; J G Georgiadis; E E W Van Houten; A J Pattison; J B Weaver; K D Paulsen Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Likun Tan; Matthew D J McGarry; Elijah E W Van Houten; Ming Ji; Ligin Solamen; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: M D J McGarry; E E W Van Houten; P R Perriñez; A J Pattison; J B Weaver; K D Paulsen Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2011-06-08 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Wei Zeng; Scott W Gordon-Wylie; Likun Tan; Ligin Solamen; Matthew D J McGarry; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2019-12-06 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Ligin M Solamen; Matthew D J McGarry; Jessica Fried; John B Weaver; S Scott Lollis; Keith D Paulsen Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2020-04-22 Impact factor: 3.173