Literature DB >> 12101471

MR elastography of the breast:preliminary clinical results.

J Lorenzen1, R Sinkus, M Lorenzen, M Dargatz, C Leussler, P Röschmann, G Adam.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Imaging of breast tumors and various breast tissues using magnetic resonance (MR) elastography (MRE) to explore the potential of elasticity as a new parameter for the diagnosis of breast lesions.
METHODS: Low-frequency mechanical waves are transmitted into breast tissue by means of an oscillator. The local characteristics of the mechanical wave are determined by the underlying elastic properties of the tissue. Theses waves can be displayed by means of a motion-sensitive spin-echo MR sequence within the phase of the MR image. Elasticity reconstruction is performed on the basis of 8 "snapshots" of each wave within the three spatial directions. We performed in-vivo measurements in 15 female patients with malignant tumors of the breast, 5 patients with benign breast tumors, and 15 healthy volunteers.
RESULTS: Malignant invasive breast tumors documented the highest values of elasticity with a median of 15.9 kPa and a wide range of stiffnesses between 8 and 28 kPa. In contrast, benign breast lesions represented low values of elasticity, which were significantly different from malignant breast tumors (median elasticity: 7.0 kPa; p = 0.0012). This was comparable to the stiffest tissue areas in healthy volunteers (median elasticity 7.0 kPa), whereas breast parenchyma (median: 2.5 kPa) and fatty breast tissue (median: 1.7 kPa) showed the lowest values of elasticity. Two invasive ductal carcinomas had elasticity values of 8 kPa and two stiff parenchyma areas in healthy volunteers had elasticities of 13 and 15 kPa. These lesions could not be differentiated by their elasticity.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that MRE is a promising new imaging modality with the capability to assess the viscoelastic properties of breast tumors and the surrounding tissues. However, from our preliminary results in a small number of patients it is obvious that there is an overlap in the elasticity ranges of soft malignant tumors and stiff benign lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12101471     DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-32690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  30 in total

1.  Matrix compliance and RhoA direct the differentiation of mammary progenitor cells.

Authors:  Cecillia Lui; KangAe Lee; Celeste M Nelson
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2011-12-10

2.  Harmonic Motion Imaging (HMI) for Tumor Imaging and Treatment Monitoring.

Authors:  Elisa E Konofagou; Caroline Maleke; Jonathan Vappou
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2012

3.  Contrast detection in fluid-saturated media with magnetic resonance poroelastography.

Authors:  Phillip R Perriñez; Adam J Pattison; Francis E Kennedy; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  AN OVERVIEW OF ELASTOGRAPHY - AN EMERGING BRANCH OF MEDICAL IMAGING.

Authors:  Armen Sarvazyan; Timothy J Hall; Matthew W Urban; Mostafa Fatemi; Salavat R Aglyamov; Brian S Garra
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2011-11

Review 5.  General review of magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Gavin Low; Scott A Kruse; David J Lomas
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-28

6.  Effects of frequency- and direction-dependent elastic materials on linearly elastic MRE image reconstructions.

Authors:  I M Perreard; A J Pattison; M Doyley; M D J McGarry; Z Barani; E E Van Houten; J B Weaver; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Breast tissue stiffness estimation for surgical guidance using gravity-induced excitation.

Authors:  Rebekah H Griesenauer; Jared A Weis; Lori R Arlinghaus; Ingrid M Meszoely; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Calculation of shear stiffness in noise dominated magnetic resonance elastography data based on principal frequency estimation.

Authors:  K P McGee; D Lake; Y Mariappan; R D Hubmayr; A Manduca; K Ansell; R L Ehman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Modeling of soft poroelastic tissue in time-harmonic MR elastography.

Authors:  Phillip R Perriñez; Francis E Kennedy; Elijah E W Van Houten; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in cancer: Technique, analysis, and applications.

Authors:  Kay M Pepin; Richard L Ehman; Kiaran P McGee
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 9.795

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.