Literature DB >> 32331966

Poroelastic Mechanical Properties of the Brain Tissue of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Patients During Lumbar Drain Treatment Using Intrinsic Actuation MR Elastography.

Ligin M Solamen1, Matthew D J McGarry2, Jessica Fried3, John B Weaver4, S Scott Lollis5, Keith D Paulsen6.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Hydrocephalus (HC) is caused by accumulating cerebrospinal fluid resulting in enlarged ventricles and neurological symptoms. HC can be treated via a shunt in a subset of patients; identifying which individuals will respond through noninvasive imaging would avoid complications from unsuccessful treatments. This preliminary work is a longitudinal study applying MR Elastography (MRE) to HC patients with a focus on normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two ventriculomegaly patients were imaged and subsequently received a lumbar drain placement for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage. NPH lumbar drain responders and NPH syndrome nonresponders were categorized by clinical presentation. Displacement images were acquired using intrinsic activation (IA) MRE and poroelastic inversion recovered shear stiffness and hydraulic conductivity values. A stable IA-MRE inversion protocol was developed to produce unique solutions for both recovered properties, independent of initial estimates.
RESULTS: Property images showed significantly increased shear modulus (p = 0.003 in periventricular region, p = 0.005 in remaining cerebral tissue) and hydraulic conductivity (p = 0.04 in periventricular region) in ventriculomegaly patients compared to healthy volunteers. Baseline MRE imaging did not detect significant differences between NPH lumbar drain responders and NPH syndrome nonresponders; however, MRE time series analysis demonstrated consistent trends in average poroelastic shear modulus values over the course of the lumbar drain process in responders (initial increase, followed by a later decrease) which did not occur in nonresponders.
CONCLUSION: These findings are indicative of acute mechanical changes in the brain resulting from CSF drainage in NPH patients.
Copyright © 2020 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hydrocephalus; Intrinsic activation; Lumbar drain; Magnetic resonance elastography; Normal pressure hydrocephalus

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32331966      PMCID: PMC7575616          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  43 in total

1.  Three-day CSF drainage barely reduces ventricular size in normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Niklas Lenfeldt; William Hansson; Anne Larsson; Richard Birgander; Anders Eklund; Jan Malm
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Contrast detection in fluid-saturated media with magnetic resonance poroelastography.

Authors:  Phillip R Perriñez; Adam J Pattison; Francis E Kennedy; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Phase-Contrast MRI CSF Flow Measurements for the Diagnosis of Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus: Observer Agreement of Velocity Versus Volume Parameters.

Authors:  Ahmed Mohamed Tawfik; Lamiaa Elsorogy; Rabab Abdelghaffar; Ayman Abdel Naby; Ibrahim Elmenshawi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Selection of patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus for shunt placement: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Carmelo Anile; Pasquale De Bonis; Alessio Albanese; Alessandro Di Chirico; Annunziato Mangiola; Gianpaolo Petrella; Pietro Santini
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Spatially-resolved hydraulic conductivity estimation via poroelastic magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Adam J Pattison; Matthew McGarry; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Brain mechanical property measurement using MRE with intrinsic activation.

Authors:  John B Weaver; Adam J Pattison; Matthew D McGarry; Irina M Perreard; Jessica G Swienckowski; Clifford J Eskey; S Scott Lollis; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Modeling of soft poroelastic tissue in time-harmonic MR elastography.

Authors:  Phillip R Perriñez; Francis E Kennedy; Elijah E W Van Houten; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Cerebral hemodynamics in normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Evaluation by 133Xe inhalation method and dynamic CT study.

Authors:  N Tamaki; T Kusunoki; T Wakabayashi; S Matsumoto
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Subject-specific multi-poroelastic model for exploring the risk factors associated with the early stages of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Liwei Guo; John C Vardakis; Toni Lassila; Micaela Mitolo; Nishant Ravikumar; Dean Chou; Matthias Lange; Ali Sarrami-Foroushani; Brett J Tully; Zeike A Taylor; Susheel Varma; Annalena Venneri; Alejandro F Frangi; Yiannis Ventikos
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.906

10.  High-resolution magnetic resonance elastography reveals differences in subcortical gray matter viscoelasticity between young and healthy older adults.

Authors:  Lucy V Hiscox; Curtis L Johnson; Matthew D J McGarry; Michael Perrins; Aimee Littlejohn; Edwin J R van Beek; Neil Roberts; John M Starr
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.673

View more
  4 in total

1.  Mapping heterogenous anisotropic tissue mechanical properties with transverse isotropic nonlinear inversion MR elastography.

Authors:  Matthew McGarry; Elijah Van Houten; Damian Sowinski; Dhrubo Jyoti; Daniel R Smith; Diego A Caban-Rivera; Grace McIlvain; Philip Bayly; Curtis L Johnson; John Weaver; Keith Paulsen
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 13.828

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance elastography in normal pressure hydrocephalus-a scoping review.

Authors:  Jan Saip Aunan-Diop; Christian Bonde Pedersen; Bo Halle; Ulla Jensen; Sune Munthe; Fredrik Harbo; Bjarni Johannsson; Frantz Rom Poulsen
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  Lorentz force induced shear waves for magnetic resonance elastography applications.

Authors:  Guillaume Flé; Guillaume Gilbert; Pol Grasland-Mongrain; Guy Cloutier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  3D amplified MRI (aMRI).

Authors:  Itamar Terem; Leo Dang; Allen Champagne; Javid Abderezaei; Aymeric Pionteck; Zainab Almadan; Anna-Maria Lydon; Mehmet Kurt; Miriam Scadeng; Samantha J Holdsworth
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 4.668

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.