Literature DB >> 10502650

Ankle and hip postural strategies defined by joint torques.

C F Runge1, C L Shupert, F B Horak, F E Zajac.   

Abstract

Previous studies have identified two discrete strategies for the control of posture in the sagittal plane based on EMG activations, body kinematics, and ground reaction forces. The ankle strategy was characterized by body sway resembling a single-segment-inverted pendulum and was elicited on flat support surfaces. In contrast, the hip strategy was characterized by body sway resembling a double-segment inverted pendulum divided at the hip and was elicited on short or compliant support surfaces. However, biomechanical optimization models have suggested that hip strategy should be observed in response to fast translations on a flat surface also, provided the feet are constrained to remain in contact with the floor and the knee is constrained to remain straight. The purpose of this study was to examine the experimental evidence for hip strategy in postural responses to backward translations of a flat support surface and to determine whether analyses of joint torques would provide evidence for two separate postural strategies. Normal subjects standing on a flat support surface were translated backward with a range of velocities from fast (55 cm/s) to slow (5 cm/s). EMG activations and joint kinematics showed pattern changes consistent with previous experimental descriptions of mixed hip and ankle strategy with increasing platform velocity. Joint torque analyses revealed the addition of a hip flexor torque to the ankle plantarflexor torque during fast translations. This finding indicates the addition of hip strategy to ankle strategy to produce a continuum of postural responses. Hip torque without accompanying ankle torque (pure hip strategy) was not observed. Although postural control strategies have previously been defined by how the body moves, we conclude that joint torques, which indicate how body movements are produced, are useful in defining postural control strategies. These results also illustrate how the biomechanics of the body can transform discrete control patterns into a continuum of postural corrections.

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Neuroscience; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10502650     DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(99)00032-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  112 in total

1.  Postural muscle activity during bilateral and unilateral arm movements at different speeds.

Authors:  G Mochizuki; T D Ivanova; S J Garland
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Vestibular actions on back and lower limb muscles during postural tasks in man.

Authors:  Alima S Ali; Katherine A Rowen; J F Iles
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Reduced plantar sensitivity alters postural responses to lateral perturbations of balance.

Authors:  Peter F Meyer; Lars I E Oddsson; Carlo J De Luca
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Decreased variability in postural control strategies in young people with non-specific low back pain is associated with altered proprioceptive reweighting.

Authors:  Kurt Claeys; Simon Brumagne; Wim Dankaerts; Henri Kiers; Lotte Janssens
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Deceleration affects anticipatory and reactive components of triggered postural responses.

Authors:  Mark G Carpenter; Alf Thorstensson; Andrew G Cresswell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Minimal step length necessary for recovery of forward balance loss with a single step.

Authors:  Ming Wu; Linhong Ji; Dewen Jin; Yi-chung Pai
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Coherence analysis of muscle activity during quiet stance.

Authors:  Mark Saffer; Tim Kiemel; John Jeka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The influence of natural body sway on neuromuscular responses to an unpredictable surface translation.

Authors:  Craig D Tokuno; Mark G Carpenter; Alf Thorstensson; Andrew G Cresswell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Human standing posture control system depending on adopted strategies.

Authors:  N Fujisawa; T Masuda; Y Inaoka; H Fukuoka; A Ishida; H Minamitani
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Muscle contributions to frontal plane angular momentum during walking.

Authors:  Richard R Neptune; Craig P McGowan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.