Literature DB >> 19444072

Differences in balance strategies between nonspecific chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects during unstable sitting.

Ulrike Van Daele1, Friso Hagman, Steven Truijen, Peter Vorlat, Bart Van Gheluwe, Peter Vaes.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A 2-group experimental design.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences in postural control strategies of pelvis and trunk movement between nonspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients and healthy control subjects using 3-dimensional motion analysis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Increased postural sway assessed by center of pressure displacements have been documented in patients with low back pain (LBP). The 3-dimensional movement strategies used by patients with LBP to keep their balance are not well documented.
METHODS: Nineteen CLBP patients and 20 control subjects were included based on detailed clinical criteria. Every subject was submitted to a postural control test in an unstable sitting position. A 3-dimensional motion analysis system, equipped with 7 infrared M1 cameras, was used to track 9 markers attached to the pelvis and trunk to estimate their angular displacement in the 3 cardinal planes.
RESULTS: The total angular deviation in all 3 directions of pelvis and trunk was higher in the CLBP group compared with the control group. In 4 of the 6 calculated differences, a significant higher deviation was found in the CLBP group (significant P-values between 0.013 and 0.047). Subjects of both groups mostly used rotation compared with lateral flexion and flexion/extension displacements of pelvis and trunk to adjust balance disturbance. The CLBP group showed a high correlation (Pearson: 0.912-0.981) between movement of pelvis and trunk, compared with the control group.
CONCLUSION: A higher postural sway and high correlation between pelvis and trunk displacements was found in the LBP group compared with healthy controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19444072     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819ca3ee

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  Decreased variability in postural control strategies in young people with non-specific low back pain is associated with altered proprioceptive reweighting.

Authors:  Kurt Claeys; Simon Brumagne; Wim Dankaerts; Henri Kiers; Lotte Janssens
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Reliability of assessing postural control during seated balancing using a physical human-robot interaction.

Authors:  Ahmed Ramadan; Jacek Cholewicki; Clark J Radcliffe; John M Popovich; N Peter Reeves; Jongeun Choi
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  [Anterior cruciate ligament ruptures and postural control: correlation of functional knee scores with computerized dynamic posturography].

Authors:  F Brattinger; B Stegmüller; H-J Riesner; B Friemert; H-G Palm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Immediate Effects of Lumbosacral Orthosis on Postural Stability in Patients with Low Back Pain: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Azadinia; Ismail Ebrahimi-Takamjani; Mojtaba Kamyab; Morteza Asgari; Mohamad Parnianpour
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-07

5.  A RCT comparing lumbosacral orthosis to routine physical therapy on postural stability in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Fatemeh Azadinia; Ismail Ebrahimi-Takamjani; Mojtaba Kamyab; Mohamad Parnianpour; Morteza Asgari
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2017-05-01

6.  The immediate effect of two lumbar stabilization methods on postural control parameters and their reliability during two balance tasks.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdelhafid Kadri; Marianne Violette; Mathieu Dallaire; Fábio Carlos Lucas de Oliveira; Martin Lavallière; Suzy Ngomo; Louis-David Beaulieu; Christian Larivière; Rubens A da Silva
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2021-01-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.