Literature DB >> 20821698

Potential application of population models in the European ecological risk assessment of chemicals. II. Review of models and their potential to address environmental protection aims.

Nika Galic1, Udo Hommen, J M Hans Baveco, Paul J van den Brink.   

Abstract

Whereas current chemical risk assessment (RA) schemes within the European Union (EU) focus mainly on toxicity and bioaccumulation of chemicals in individual organisms, most protection goals aim at preserving populations of nontarget organisms rather than individuals. Ecological models are tools rarely recommended in official technical documents on RA of chemicals, but are widely used by researchers to assess risks to populations, communities and ecosystems. Their great advantage is the relatively straightforward integration of the sensitivity of species to chemicals, the mode of action and fate in the environment of toxicants, life-history traits of the species of concern, and landscape features. To promote the usage of ecological models in regulatory risk assessment, this study tries to establish whether existing, published ecological modeling studies have addressed or have the potential to address the protection aims and requirements of the chemical directives of the EU. We reviewed 148 publications, and evaluated and analyzed them in a database according to defined criteria. Published models were also classified in terms of 5 areas where their application would be most useful for chemical RA. All potential application areas are well represented in the published literature. Most models were developed to estimate population-level responses on the basis of individual effects, followed by recovery process assessment, both in individuals and at the level of metapopulations. We provide case studies for each of the proposed areas of ecological model application. The lack of clarity about protection goals in legislative documents made it impossible to establish a direct link between modeling studies and protection goals. Because most of the models reviewed here were not developed for regulatory risk assessment, there is great potential and a variety of ecological models in the published literature. (c) 2010 SETAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20821698     DOI: 10.1002/ieam.68

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  14 in total

1.  A comparison of simple and complex population models to reduce uncertainty in ecological risk assessments of chemicals: example with three species of Daphnia.

Authors:  Niklas Hanson; John D Stark
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 2.  A framework for predicting impacts on ecosystem services from (sub)organismal responses to chemicals.

Authors:  Valery E Forbes; Chris J Salice; Bjorn Birnir; Randy J F Bruins; Peter Calow; Virginie Ducrot; Nika Galic; Kristina Garber; Bret C Harvey; Henriette Jager; Andrew Kanarek; Robert Pastorok; Steve F Railsback; Richard Rebarber; Pernille Thorbek
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Inter-comparison of population models for the calculation of radiation dose effects on wildlife.

Authors:  Jordi Vives I Batlle; Tatiana G Sazykina; Alexander Kryshev; Luigi Monte; Isao Kawaguchi
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  A framework for linking population model development with ecological risk assessment objectives.

Authors:  Sandy Raimondo; Matthew Etterson; Nathan Pollesch; Kristina Garber; Andrew Kanarek; Wade Lehmann; Jill Awkerman
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.992

5.  Species traits as predictors for intrinsic sensitivity of aquatic invertebrates to the insecticide chlorpyrifos.

Authors:  Mascha N Rubach; Donald J Baird; Marie-Claire Boerwinkel; Stephen J Maund; Ivo Roessink; Paul J Van den Brink
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Combined and interactive effects of global climate change and toxicants on populations and communities.

Authors:  S Jannicke Moe; Karel De Schamphelaere; William H Clements; Mary T Sorensen; Paul J Van den Brink; Matthias Liess
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.742

7.  Pop-guide: Population modeling guidance, use, interpretation, and development for ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Sandy Raimondo; Amelie Schmolke; Nathan Pollesch; Chiara Accolla; Nika Galic; Adrian Moore; Maxime Vaugeois; Pamela Rueda-Cediel; Andrew Kanarek; Jill Awkerman; Valery Forbes
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  A list of fish species that are potentially exposed to pesticides in edge-of-field water bodies in the European Union--a first step towards identifying vulnerable representatives for risk assessment.

Authors:  Lara Ibrahim; Thomas G Preuss; Hans Toni Ratte; Udo Hommen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Acute toxicity tests with Daphnia magna, Americamysis bahia, Chironomus riparius and Gammarus pulex and implications of new EU requirements for the aquatic effect assessment of insecticides.

Authors:  Theo C M Brock; René P A Van Wijngaarden
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 10.  The pros and cons of ecological risk assessment based on data from different levels of biological organization.

Authors:  Jason R Rohr; Christopher J Salice; Roger M Nisbet
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 6.184

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.