Literature DB >> 20821418

Multimedia modeling of human exposure to chemical substances: the roles of food web biomagnification and biotransformation.

Jon A Arnot1, Don Mackay, Thomas F Parkerton, Rosemary T Zaleski, Christopher S Warren.   

Abstract

The Risk Assessment IDentification And Ranking (RAIDAR) model is refined to calculate relative human exposures as expressed by total intake, intake fraction (iF), and total body burden (TBB) metrics. The RAIDAR model is applied to three persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and six petrochemicals using four mode-of-entry emission scenarios to evaluate the effect of metabolic biotransformation estimates on human exposure calculations. When biotransformation rates are assumed to be negligible, daily intake and iFs for the nine substances ranged over six orders of magnitude and TBBs ranged over 10 orders of magnitude. Including biotransformation estimates for fish, birds, and mammals reduced substance-specific daily intake and iF by up to 4.5 orders of magnitude and TBB by more than eight orders of magnitude. The RAIDAR iF calculations are compared to the European Union System for the Evaluation of Substances (EUSES) model iF calculations and differences are discussed, especially the treatment of food web bioaccumulation. Model selection and application assumptions result in different rankings of human exposure potential. These results suggest a need to critically consider model selection and to include reliable biotransformation rate estimates when assessing relative human exposure and ranking substances for priority setting. Recommendations for further model evaluations and revisions are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20821418     DOI: 10.1002/etc.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  5 in total

1.  FutureTox: building the road for 21st century toxicology and risk assessment practices.

Authors:  J Craig Rowlands; Miriam Sander; James S Bus
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  A framework for an alternatives assessment dashboard for evaluating chemical alternatives applied to flame retardants for electronic applications.

Authors:  Todd M Martin
Journal:  Clean Technol Environ Policy       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 3.  Animal-Free Chemical Safety Assessment.

Authors:  George D Loizou
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Qualitative approach to comparative exposure in alternatives assessment.

Authors:  William Greggs; Thomas Burns; Peter Egeghy; Michelle R Embry; Peter Fantke; Bonnie Gaborek; Lauren Heine; Olivier Jolliet; Carolyn Lee; Derek Muir; Kathy Plotzke; Joseph Rinkevich; Neha Sunger; Jennifer Y Tanir; Margaret Whittaker
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 2.992

5.  Prioritizing chemicals and data requirements for screening-level exposure and risk assessment.

Authors:  Jon A Arnot; Trevor N Brown; Frank Wania; Knut Breivik; Michael S McLachlan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 9.031

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.