Literature DB >> 20820762

Implicit motor learning from target error during explicit reach control.

Brendan D Cameron1, Ian M Franks, J Timothy Inglis, Romeo Chua.   

Abstract

Many studies have shown adapted reaching in the face of altered visual feedback. These studies typically involve iterative corrections to the error induced by the perturbation until relatively normal performance is achieved. Here, we investigate whether adaptation (indexed by aftereffects) can occur when direct corrections to a target are inhibited by giving participants an explicit reach task. During the exposure phase of our study, participants were instructed to undershoot a target that imperceptibly moved between movement onset and movement end. The size of the target displacement was gradually increased, while the instructed undershoot distance was equivalently increased, such that participants were, unknowingly, aiming to the same location throughout exposure. When participants were subsequently instructed to aim at the target during the post-test, they overshot the target, suggesting that adaptation had occurred in the presence of an explicit task and in the absence of direct corrections to the target perturbation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20820762     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2402-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  13 in total

1.  Strategic calibration and spatial alignment: a model from prism adaptation.

Authors:  Gordon M Redding; Benjamin Wallace
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 2.  Applications of prism adaptation: a tutorial in theory and method.

Authors:  Gordon M Redding; Yves Rossetti; Benjamin Wallace
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Automatic drive of limb motor plasticity.

Authors:  F Magescas; C Prablanc
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Enhancing visuomotor adaptation by reducing error signals: single-step (aware) versus multiple-step (unaware) exposure to wedge prisms.

Authors:  Carine Michel; Laure Pisella; Claude Prablanc; Gilles Rode; Yves Rossetti
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Adaptive spatial alignment and strategic perceptual-motor control.

Authors:  G M Redding; B Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Trajectories of reaches to prismatically-displaced targets: evidence for "automatic" visuomotor recalibration.

Authors:  L S Jakobson; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Reach adaptation to explicit vs. implicit target error.

Authors:  Brendan D Cameron; Ian M Franks; J Timothy Inglis; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation?

Authors:  Kunlin Wei; Konrad Körding
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Spatial remapping of the visual world across saccades.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  6 in total

1.  A spatial explicit strategy reduces error but interferes with sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Bryan L Benson; Joaquin A Anguera; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The extent of interlimb transfer following adaptation to a novel visuomotor condition does not depend on awareness of the condition.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Mukta Joshi; Yuming Lei
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The influence of task outcome on implicit motor learning.

Authors:  Hyosub E Kim; Darius E Parvin; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Sinusoidal error perturbation reveals multiple coordinate systems for sensorymotor adaptation.

Authors:  Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Visuomotor adaptation needs a validation of prediction error by feedback error.

Authors:  Valérie Gaveau; Claude Prablanc; Damien Laurent; Yves Rossetti; Anne-Emmanuelle Priot
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Interactions between sensory prediction error and task error during implicit motor learning.

Authors:  Jonathan S Tsay; Adrian M Haith; Richard B Ivry; Hyosub E Kim
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.779

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.