Literature DB >> 16417684

Automatic drive of limb motor plasticity.

F Magescas1, C Prablanc.   

Abstract

The ability to perform accurate limb movements may require learning mechanisms that continually tune the motor system. In the current study, we isolate a form of pure limb motor plasticity. Participants reached to targets that were turned off just after the onset of an initial eye movement, reappearing at a new location at the end of the reaching movement. In contrast to classical prism or virtual reality paradigms, our task eliminated sensory adaptation by always maintaining a congruency between the seen and felt limb position. We also minimized awareness and potential adaptation processes on the basis of volitional strategies by progressively increasing the size of the target perturbations. In this manner, our adaptation procedure mimicked conditions used to study saccadic adaptation. The results indicated that adaptation under these conditions led to a robust after-effect that generalized to a large range of movements within the workspace. This fully natural, nonimposed generalization of adaptation is not expressed in a spatial coordinate system, but more likely in a joint-centered coordinate space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16417684     DOI: 10.1162/089892906775250058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  20 in total

1.  Generalization properties of a "saccadic-like" hand-reaching adaptation along a single degree of freedom.

Authors:  Damien Laurent; Olivier Sillan; Claude Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Implicit motor learning from target error during explicit reach control.

Authors:  Brendan D Cameron; Ian M Franks; J Timothy Inglis; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Calibration of visually guided reaching is driven by error-corrective learning and internal dynamics.

Authors:  Sen Cheng; Philip N Sabes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Visual-shift adaptation is composed of separable sensory and task-dependent effects.

Authors:  M C Simani; L M M McGuire; P N Sabes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Two modes of error processing in reaching.

Authors:  Frederic Magescas; Christian Urquizar; Claude Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Adaptation of egocentric distance perception under telestereoscopic viewing within reaching space.

Authors:  Anne-Emmanuelle Priot; Rafael Laboissière; Olivier Sillan; Corinne Roumes; Claude Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Saccadic-like visuomotor adaptation involves little if any perceptual effects.

Authors:  Damien Laurent; Olivier Sillan; Claude Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Reach adaptation to online target error.

Authors:  Brendan D Cameron; Ian M Franks; J Timothy Inglis; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Concurrent adaptation of reactive saccades and hand pointing movements to equal and to opposite changes of target direction.

Authors:  Valentina Grigorova; Otmar Bock; Steliana Borisova
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Explicit knowledge and real-time action control: anticipating a change does not make us respond more quickly.

Authors:  Brendan D Cameron; Darian T Cheng; Romeo Chua; Paul van Donkelaar; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.