Literature DB >> 20816881

A survey of computational methods and error rate estimation procedures for peptide and protein identification in shotgun proteomics.

Alexey I Nesvizhskii1.   

Abstract

This manuscript provides a comprehensive review of the peptide and protein identification process using tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) data generated in shotgun proteomic experiments. The commonly used methods for assigning peptide sequences to MS/MS spectra are critically discussed and compared, from basic strategies to advanced multi-stage approaches. A particular attention is paid to the problem of false-positive identifications. Existing statistical approaches for assessing the significance of peptide to spectrum matches are surveyed, ranging from single-spectrum approaches such as expectation values to global error rate estimation procedures such as false discovery rates and posterior probabilities. The importance of using auxiliary discriminant information (mass accuracy, peptide separation coordinates, digestion properties, and etc.) is discussed, and advanced computational approaches for joint modeling of multiple sources of information are presented. This review also includes a detailed analysis of the issues affecting the interpretation of data at the protein level, including the amplification of error rates when going from peptide to protein level, and the ambiguities in inferring the identifies of sample proteins in the presence of shared peptides. Commonly used methods for computing protein-level confidence scores are discussed in detail. The review concludes with a discussion of several outstanding computational issues.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20816881      PMCID: PMC2956504          DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteomics        ISSN: 1874-3919            Impact factor:   4.044


  281 in total

Review 1.  Protein identification by mass spectrometry: issues to be considered.

Authors:  Michael A Baldwin
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Open mass spectrometry search algorithm.

Authors:  Lewis Y Geer; Sanford P Markey; Jeffrey A Kowalak; Lukas Wagner; Ming Xu; Dawn M Maynard; Xiaoyu Yang; Wenyao Shi; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  Lookup peaks: a hybrid of de novo sequencing and database search for protein identification by tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Marshall Bern; Yuhan Cai; David Goldberg
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  The Paragon Algorithm, a next generation search engine that uses sequence temperature values and feature probabilities to identify peptides from tandem mass spectra.

Authors:  Ignat V Shilov; Sean L Seymour; Alpesh A Patel; Alex Loboda; Wilfred H Tang; Sean P Keating; Christie L Hunter; Lydia M Nuwaysir; Daniel A Schaeffer
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2007-05-27       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  DtaRefinery, a software tool for elimination of systematic errors from parent ion mass measurements in tandem mass spectra data sets.

Authors:  Vladislav A Petyuk; Anoop M Mayampurath; Matthew E Monroe; Ashoka D Polpitiya; Samuel O Purvine; Gordon A Anderson; David G Camp; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  A software program for more reliable precursor ion assignation from LC-MS analysis using LTQ ultra zoom scan.

Authors:  Takashi Shinkawa; Kohji Nagano; Noriyuki Inomata; Masayuki Haramura
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Quantifying the impact of chimera MS/MS spectra on peptide identification in large-scale proteomics studies.

Authors:  Stephane Houel; Robert Abernathy; Kutralanathan Renganathan; Karen Meyer-Arendt; Natalie G Ahn; William M Old
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Mascot-derived false positive peptide identifications revealed by manual analysis of tandem mass spectra.

Authors:  Yue Chen; Junmei Zhang; Gang Xing; Yingming Zhao
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  Post-acquisition ETD spectral processing for increased peptide identifications.

Authors:  David M Good; Craig D Wenger; Graeme C McAlister; Dina L Bai; Donald F Hunt; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.109

10.  Genome annotation of Anopheles gambiae using mass spectrometry-derived data.

Authors:  Dário E Kalume; Suraj Peri; Raghunath Reddy; Jun Zhong; Mobolaji Okulate; Nirbhay Kumar; Akhilesh Pandey
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  180 in total

1.  Identification of best indicators of peptide-spectrum match using a permutation resampling approach.

Authors:  Malik N Akhtar; Bruce R Southey; Per E Andrén; Jonathan V Sweedler; Sandra L Rodriguez-Zas
Journal:  J Bioinform Comput Biol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.122

Review 2.  Modification site localization scoring: strategies and performance.

Authors:  Robert J Chalkley; Karl R Clauser
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Supporting tool suite for production proteomics.

Authors:  Ze-Qiang Ma; David L Tabb; Joseph Burden; Matthew C Chambers; Matthew B Cox; Michael J Cantrell; Amy-Joan L Ham; Michael D Litton; Michael R Oreto; William C Schultz; Scott M Sobecki; Tina Y Tsui; Gregory R Wernke; Daniel C Liebler
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Target-decoy approach and false discovery rate: when things may go wrong.

Authors:  Nitin Gupta; Nuno Bandeira; Uri Keich; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Data analysis strategy for maximizing high-confidence protein identifications in complex proteomes such as human tumor secretomes and human serum.

Authors:  Huan Wang; Hsin-Yao Tang; Glenn C Tan; David W Speicher
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Tempest: GPU-CPU computing for high-throughput database spectral matching.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Milloy; Brendan K Faherty; Scott A Gerber
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Posttranslational Protein Modifications in Plant Metabolism.

Authors:  Giulia Friso; Klaas J van Wijk
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification.

Authors:  Nathan P Manes; Jessica M Mann; Aleksandra Nita-Lazar
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  An Alignment-Free "Metapeptide" Strategy for Metaproteomic Characterization of Microbiome Samples Using Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing.

Authors:  Damon H May; Emma Timmins-Schiffman; Molly P Mikan; H Rodger Harvey; Elhanan Borenstein; Brook L Nunn; William S Noble
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 10.  Identification and Quantification of Proteoforms by Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Leah V Schaffer; Robert J Millikin; Rachel M Miller; Lissa C Anderson; Ryan T Fellers; Ying Ge; Neil L Kelleher; Richard D LeDuc; Xiaowen Liu; Samuel H Payne; Liangliang Sun; Paul M Thomas; Trisha Tucholski; Zhe Wang; Si Wu; Zhijie Wu; Dahang Yu; Michael R Shortreed; Lloyd M Smith
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.