Literature DB >> 20578722

Quantifying the impact of chimera MS/MS spectra on peptide identification in large-scale proteomics studies.

Stephane Houel1, Robert Abernathy, Kutralanathan Renganathan, Karen Meyer-Arendt, Natalie G Ahn, William M Old.   

Abstract

A complicating factor for protein identification within complex mixtures by LC/MS/MS is the problem of "chimera" spectra, where two or more precursor ions with similar mass and retention time are co-sequenced by MS/MS. Chimera spectra show reduced scores due to unidentifiable fragment ions derived from contaminating parents. However, the extent of chimeras in LC/MS/MS data sets and their impact on protein identification workflows are incompletely understood. We report ChimeraCounter, a software program which detects chimeras in data sets collected on an Orbitrap/LTQ instrument. Evaluation of synthetic chimeras created from pairs of well-defined peptide MS/MS spectra reveal that chimeras reduce database search scores most significantly when contaminating fragment ion intensities exceed 20% of the targeted fragment ion intensities. In large-scale data sets, the identification rate for chimera MS/MS is 2-fold lower compared to nonchimera spectra. Importantly, this occurs in a manner which depends not on absolute precursor ion intensity, but on intensity relative to the median precursor intensity distribution. We further show that chimeras reduce the number of accepted peptide identifications by increasing false negatives while showing little increase in false positives. The results provide a framework for identifying chimeras and characterizing their contribution to the poorly understood false negative class of MS/MS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20578722      PMCID: PMC3221600          DOI: 10.1021/pr1003856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  14 in total

1.  A two-dimensional quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer.

Authors:  Jae C Schwartz; Michael W Senko; John E P Syka
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies.

Authors:  John D Storey; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Fragmentation pathways of protonated peptides.

Authors:  Béla Paizs; Sándor Suhai
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 10.946

4.  Addressing accuracy and precision issues in iTRAQ quantitation.

Authors:  Natasha A Karp; Wolfgang Huber; Pawel G Sadowski; Philip D Charles; Svenja V Hester; Kathryn S Lilley
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Automated approach for quantitative analysis of complex peptide mixtures from tandem mass spectra.

Authors:  John D Venable; Meng-Qiu Dong; James Wohlschlegel; Andrew Dillin; John R Yates
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 6.  Assigning significance to peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry using decoy databases.

Authors:  Lukas Käll; John D Storey; Michael J MacCoss; William Stafford Noble
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  The implications of proteolytic background for shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Paola Picotti; Ruedi Aebersold; Bruno Domon
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2007-05-28       Impact factor: 5.911

8.  Simultaneous qualitative and quantitative analysis of the Escherichia coli proteome: a sweet tale.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Silva; Richard Denny; Craig Dorschel; Marc V Gorenstein; Guo-Zhong Li; Keith Richardson; Daniel Wall; Scott J Geromanos
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Identification of tryptic peptides from large databases using multiplexed tandem mass spectrometry: simulations and experimental results.

Authors:  Christophe Masselon; Ljiljana Pasa-Tolić; Sang-Won Lee; Lingjun Li; Gordon A Anderson; Richard Harkewicz; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.984

10.  A common open representation of mass spectrometry data and its application to proteomics research.

Authors:  Patrick G A Pedrioli; Jimmy K Eng; Robert Hubley; Mathijs Vogelzang; Eric W Deutsch; Brian Raught; Brian Pratt; Erik Nilsson; Ruth H Angeletti; Rolf Apweiler; Kei Cheung; Catherine E Costello; Henning Hermjakob; Sequin Huang; Randall K Julian; Eugene Kapp; Mark E McComb; Stephen G Oliver; Gilbert Omenn; Norman W Paton; Richard Simpson; Richard Smith; Chris F Taylor; Weimin Zhu; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  46 in total

1.  Nanospray FAIMS fractionation provides significant increases in proteome coverage of unfractionated complex protein digests.

Authors:  Kristian E Swearingen; Michael R Hoopmann; Richard S Johnson; Ramsey A Saleem; John D Aitchison; Robert L Moritz
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Peptide identification by database search of mixture tandem mass spectra.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Philip E Bourne; Nuno Bandeira
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Design and application of a data-independent precursor and product ion repository.

Authors:  Konstantinos Thalassinos; Johannes P C Vissers; Stefan Tenzer; Yishai Levin; J Will Thompson; David Daniel; Darrin Mann; Mark R DeLong; M Arthur Moseley; Antoine H America; Andrew K Ottens; Greg S Cavey; Georgios Efstathiou; James H Scrivens; James I Langridge; Scott J Geromanos
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  JUMP: a tag-based database search tool for peptide identification with high sensitivity and accuracy.

Authors:  Xusheng Wang; Yuxin Li; Zhiping Wu; Hong Wang; Haiyan Tan; Junmin Peng
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  MixGF: spectral probabilities for mixture spectra from more than one peptide.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Philip E Bourne; Nuno Bandeira
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  On an aerodynamic mechanism to enhance ion transmission and sensitivity of FAIMS for nano-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Satendra Prasad; Michael W Belford; Jean-Jacques Dunyach; Randy W Purves
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Rapid Characterization of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) by Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry (IMS-MS).

Authors:  James N Dodds; Zachary R Hopkins; Detlef R U Knappe; Erin S Baker
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 8.  A survey of computational methods and error rate estimation procedures for peptide and protein identification in shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Alexey I Nesvizhskii
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Advanced Precursor Ion Selection Algorithms for Increased Depth of Bottom-Up Proteomic Profiling.

Authors:  Simion Kreimer; Mikhail E Belov; William F Danielson; Lev I Levitsky; Mikhail V Gorshkov; Barry L Karger; Alexander R Ivanov
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Use of captive spray ionization to increase throughput of the data-independent acquisition technique PAcIFIC.

Authors:  John D Chapman; J Scott Edgar; David R Goodlett; Young Ah Goo
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.