Literature DB >> 19362853

Post-acquisition ETD spectral processing for increased peptide identifications.

David M Good1, Craig D Wenger, Graeme C McAlister, Dina L Bai, Donald F Hunt, Joshua J Coon.   

Abstract

Tandem mass spectra (MS/MS) produced using electron transfer dissociation (ETD) differ from those derived from collision-activated dissociation (CAD) in several important ways. Foremost, the predominant fragment ion series are different: c- and z(*)-type ions are favored in ETD spectra while b- and y-type ions comprise the bulk of the fragments in CAD spectra. Additionally, ETD spectra possess charge-reduced precursors and unique neutral losses. Most database search algorithms were designed to analyze CAD spectra, and have only recently been adapted to accommodate c- and z(*)-type ions; therefore, inclusion of these additional spectral features can hinder identification, leading to lower confidence scores and decreased sensitivity. Because of this, it is important to pre-process spectral data before submission to a database search to remove those features that cause complications. Here, we demonstrate the effects of removing these features on the number of unique peptide identifications at a 1% false discovery rate (FDR) using the open mass spectrometry search algorithm (OMSSA). When analyzing two biologic replicates of a yeast protein extract in three total analyses, the number of unique identifications with a approximately 1% FDR increased from 4611 to 5931 upon spectral pre-processing--an increase of approximately 28.6%. We outline the most effective pre-processing methods, and provide free software containing these algorithms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19362853      PMCID: PMC2716440          DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2009.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  18 in total

1.  Letter: the diagnostic value of amino acid side-chain losses in electron capture dissociation of polypeptides. Comment on: "Can the (M(.)-X) region in electron capture dissociation provide reliable information on amino acid composition of polypeptides?", Eur. J. Mass Spectrom. 8, 461-469 (2002).

Authors:  Helen J Cooper; Kristina Håkansson; Alan G Marshall; Robert R Hudgins; Kim F Haselmann; Frank Kjeldsen; Bogdan A Budnik; Nick C Polfer; Roman A Zubarev
Journal:  Eur J Mass Spectrom (Chichester)       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.067

2.  Peptide and protein sequence analysis by electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry.

Authors:  John E P Syka; Joshua J Coon; Melanie J Schroeder; Jeffrey Shabanowitz; Donald F Hunt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Joshua E Elias; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Performance characteristics of electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry.

Authors:  David M Good; Matthew Wirtala; Graeme C McAlister; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Side-chain losses in electron capture dissociation to improve peptide identification.

Authors:  Mikhail M Savitski; Michael L Nielsen; Roman A Zubarev
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-02-03       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Analytical utility of small neutral losses from reduced species in electron capture dissociation studied using SwedECD database.

Authors:  Maria Fälth; Mikhail M Savitski; Michael L Nielsen; Frank Kjeldsen; Per E Andren; Roman A Zubarev
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Characterization of amino acid side chain losses in electron capture dissociation.

Authors:  Helen J Cooper; Robert R Hudgins; Kristina Håkansson; Alan G Marshall
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Subfemtomole MS and MS/MS peptide sequence analysis using nano-HPLC micro-ESI fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry.

Authors:  S E Martin; J Shabanowitz; D F Hunt; J A Marto
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  A proteomics grade electron transfer dissociation-enabled hybrid linear ion trap-orbitrap mass spectrometer.

Authors:  Graeme C McAlister; W Travis Berggren; Jens Griep-Raming; Stevan Horning; Alexander Makarov; Doug Phanstiel; George Stafford; Danielle L Swaney; John E P Syka; Vlad Zabrouskov; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Decision tree-driven tandem mass spectrometry for shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Danielle L Swaney; Graeme C McAlister; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  46 in total

1.  Sequence scrambling in shotgun proteomics is negligible.

Authors:  Anton A Goloborodko; Mikhail V Gorshkov; David M Good; Roman A Zubarev
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  The generating function of CID, ETD, and CID/ETD pairs of tandem mass spectra: applications to database search.

Authors:  Sangtae Kim; Nikolai Mischerikow; Nuno Bandeira; J Daniel Navarro; Louis Wich; Shabaz Mohammed; Albert J R Heck; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Improving software performance for peptide electron transfer dissociation data analysis by implementation of charge state- and sequence-dependent scoring.

Authors:  Peter R Baker; Katalin F Medzihradszky; Robert J Chalkley
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Enhanced characterization of singly protonated phosphopeptide ions by femtosecond laser-induced ionization/dissociation tandem mass spectrometry (fs-LID-MS/MS).

Authors:  Scott A Smith; Christine L Kalcic; Kyle A Safran; Paul M Stemmer; Marcos Dantus; Gavin E Reid
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 5.  Phosphoproteomic analysis: an emerging role in deciphering cellular signaling in human embryonic stem cells and their differentiated derivatives.

Authors:  Brian T D Tobe; Junjie Hou; Andrew M Crain; Ilyas Singec; Evan Y Snyder; Laurence M Brill
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.739

6.  A novel approach for untargeted post-translational modification identification using integer linear optimization and tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Richard C Baliban; Peter A DiMaggio; Mariana D Plazas-Mayorca; Nicolas L Young; Benjamin A Garcia; Christodoulos A Floudas
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 5.911

7.  Front-End Electron Transfer Dissociation Coupled to a 21 Tesla FT-ICR Mass Spectrometer for Intact Protein Sequence Analysis.

Authors:  Chad R Weisbrod; Nathan K Kaiser; John E P Syka; Lee Early; Christopher Mullen; Jean-Jacques Dunyach; A Michelle English; Lissa C Anderson; Greg T Blakney; Jeffrey Shabanowitz; Christopher L Hendrickson; Alan G Marshall; Donald F Hunt
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  A proteomics search algorithm specifically designed for high-resolution tandem mass spectra.

Authors:  Craig D Wenger; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  Trans-Proteomic Pipeline supports and improves analysis of electron transfer dissociation data sets.

Authors:  Eric W Deutsch; David Shteynberg; Henry Lam; Zhi Sun; Jimmy K Eng; Christine Carapito; Priska D von Haller; Natalie Tasman; Luis Mendoza; Terry Farrah; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.984

10.  Comprehensive mass spectrometric mapping of the hydroxylated amino acid residues of the α1(V) collagen chain.

Authors:  Chenxi Yang; Arick C Park; Nicholas A Davis; Jason D Russell; Byoungjae Kim; David D Brand; Matthew J Lawrence; Ying Ge; Michael S Westphall; Joshua J Coon; Daniel S Greenspan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.