Literature DB >> 20814670

Evaluation of compressive strength index of the femoral neck in Caucasians and chinese.

Na Yu1, Yong-Jun Liu, Yufang Pei, Lei Zhang, Shufeng Lei, Niraj R Kothari, Ding-You Li, Christopher J Papasian, James Hamilton, Ji-Qun Cai, Hong-Wen Deng.   

Abstract

Compressive strength index (CSI) of the femoral neck is a parameter that integrates the information of bone mineral density (BMD), femoral neck width (FNW), and body weight. CSI is considered to have the potential to improve the performance of assessment for hip fracture risk. However, studies on CSI have been rare. In particular, few studies have evaluated the performance of CSI, in comparison with BMD, FNW, and bending geometry, for assessment of hip fracture risk. We studied two large populations, including 1683 unrelated U.S. Caucasians and 2758 unrelated Chinese adults. For all the study subjects, CSI, femoral neck BMD (FN_BMD), FNW, and bending geometry (section modulus [Z]) of the samples were obtained from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans. We investigated the age-related trends of these bone phenotypes and potential sex and ethnic differences. We further evaluated the performance of these four phenotypes for assessment of hip fracture risk by logistic regression models. Chinese had significantly lower FN_BMD, FNW, and Z, but higher CSI than sex-matched Caucasians. Logistic regression analysis showed that higher CSI was significantly associated with lower risk of hip fracture, and the significance remained after adjusting for covariates of age, sex, and height. Each standard deviation (SD) increment in CSI was associated with odds ratios of 0.765 (95% confidence interval, 0.634, 0.992) and 0.724 (95% confidence interval, 0.569, 0.921) for hip fracture risk in Caucasians and Chinese, respectively. The higher CSI in Chinese may partially help explain the lower incidence of hip fractures in this population compared to Caucasians. Further studies in larger cohorts and/or longitudinal observations are necessary to confirm our findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20814670      PMCID: PMC4176885          DOI: 10.1007/s00223-010-9406-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  35 in total

1.  Differences in peak bone mass in women of European and South Asian origin can be explained by differences in body size.

Authors:  Dipak Roy; Caroline Swarbrick; Yvonne King; Stephen Pye; Judith Adams; Jacqueline Berry; Alan Silman; Terence O'Neill
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Robust and comprehensive analysis of 20 osteoporosis candidate genes by very high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism screen among 405 white nuclear families identified significant association and gene-gene interaction.

Authors:  Dong-Hai Xiong; Hui Shen; Lan-Juan Zhao; Peng Xiao; Tie-Lin Yang; Yan Guo; Wei Wang; Yan-Fang Guo; Yong-Jun Liu; Robert R Recker; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Genomic regions identified for BMD in a large sample including epistatic interactions and gender-specific effects.

Authors:  Peng Xiao; Hui Shen; Yan-Fang Guo; Dong-Hai Xiong; Yao-Zhong Liu; Yong-Jun Liu; Lan-Juan Zhao; Ji-Rong Long; Yan Guo; Robert R Recker; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Differences in bone mineral in young Asian and Caucasian Americans may reflect differences in bone size.

Authors:  G S Bhudhikanok; M C Wang; K Eckert; C Matkin; R Marcus; L K Bachrach
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Femoral neck length and hip fracture risk.

Authors:  J Michelotti; J Clark
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Femoral neck geometry and radiographic signs of osteoporosis as predictors of hip fracture.

Authors:  K M Karlsson; I Sernbo; K J Obrant; I Redlund-Johnell; O Johnell
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 7.  Hip geometry and its role in fracture: what do we know so far?

Authors:  Rhonda A Brownbill; Jasminka Z Ilich
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Bone health of immigrant Chinese women living in New York City.

Authors:  Rajeev K Babbar; Anuj B Handa; Chung-man Lo; Sally J Guttmacher; Richard Shindledecker; Waiwah Chung; Cathy Fong; Henrietta Ho-Asjoe; Rengina Chan-Ting; L Beth Dixon
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2006-02

9.  Femoral neck BMD is a strong predictor of hip fracture susceptibility in elderly men and women because it detects cortical bone instability: the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  Fernando Rivadeneira; M Carola Zillikens; Chris Edh De Laet; Albert Hofman; André G Uitterlinden; Thomas J Beck; Huibert Ap Pols
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 10.  A reference standard for the description of osteoporosis.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Eugene V McCloskey; Helena Johansson; Anders Oden; L Joseph Melton; Nikolai Khaltaev
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  17 in total

1.  Low skeletal muscle mass associates with low femoral neck strength, especially in older Korean women: the Fourth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IV).

Authors:  B-J Kim; S H Ahn; H M Kim; S H Lee; J-M Koh
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Diabetes and femoral neck strength: findings from the Hip Strength Across the Menopausal Transition Study.

Authors:  Shinya Ishii; Jane A Cauley; Carolyn J Crandall; Preethi Srikanthan; Gail A Greendale; Mei-Hua Huang; Michelle E Danielson; Arun S Karlamangla
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 3.  New advances in imaging osteoporosis and its complications.

Authors:  James F Griffith; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Trajectories of femoral neck strength in relation to the final menstrual period in a multi-ethnic cohort.

Authors:  S Ishii; J A Cauley; G A Greendale; C J Crandall; M-H Huang; M E Danielson; A S Karlamangla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  The positive association of total protein intake with femoral neck strength (KNHANES IV).

Authors:  B-J Kim; S H Lee; C M Isales; J-M Koh; M W Hamrick
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Epidemiology and structural basis of racial differences in fragility fractures in Chinese and Caucasians.

Authors:  X-F Wang; E Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Prediction of hip osteoporotic fractures from composite indices of femoral neck strength.

Authors:  Guan-Wu Li; Shi-Xin Chang; Zheng Xu; Yao Chen; Hong Bao; Xiao Shi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  C-reactive protein, bone strength, and nine-year fracture risk: data from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).

Authors:  Shinya Ishii; Jane A Cauley; Gail A Greendale; Carolyn J Crandall; Michelle E Danielson; Yasuyoshi Ouchi; Arun S Karlamangla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Insulin resistance and bone strength: findings from the study of midlife in the United States.

Authors:  Preethi Srikanthan; Carolyn J Crandall; Dana Miller-Martinez; Teresa E Seeman; Gail A Greendale; Neil Binkley; Arun S Karlamangla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Childhood socioeconomic status and adult femoral neck bone strength: findings from the Midlife in the United States Study.

Authors:  Arun S Karlamangla; Takahiro Mori; Sharon S Merkin; Teresa E Seeman; Gail A Greendale; Neil Binkley; Carolyn J Crandall
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.