Literature DB >> 15702264

Differences in peak bone mass in women of European and South Asian origin can be explained by differences in body size.

Dipak Roy1, Caroline Swarbrick, Yvonne King, Stephen Pye, Judith Adams, Jacqueline Berry, Alan Silman, Terence O'Neill.   

Abstract

There are few data concerning the occurrence of peak bone mass in women of South Asian origin. The aim of this study was to determine the level of peak bone mass in South Asian women in the UK and to determine whether any observed differences could be explained by differences in body size. Two groups of South Asian women, those of (1) Pakistani Muslim and (2) Gujarati Hindu origin, together with a European group aged 18 to 36 years, were recruited from primary-care population age-sex registers in the Greater Manchester area. They were invited to attend for a detailed interview-assisted lifestyle questionnaire and assessment of height and weight. Bone mass density (BMD) at the hip and lumbar spine was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan (Hologic QDR 4500). Volumetric bone density was measured at the distal radius using pQCT (Norland Stratec XCT 2000). Linear regression was used to determine whether any observed differences in the level of bone mass could be explained by differences in body size. A total of 119 European women with a mean age of 30.4 years, 98 Pakistani Muslim women with a mean age of 29.2 years and 20 Gujarati Hindu women with a mean age of 29.2 years had bone density measurements performed. The Europeans were taller and heavier than either South Asian group. Peak BMD was greater among the European than the Pakistani women at all three measuring sites, with the Gujarati women having intermediate values at the hip and lumbar spine. Observed differences disappeared, however, after adjusting for height and weight. There were no differences in volumetric density at the lumbar spine or distal radius between the groups. In summary, there are differences in the level of bone mass between European and South Asian women, though these can be explained by differences in bone size, height or weight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15702264     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-1837-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  28 in total

1.  Bone mineral acquisition in healthy Asian, Hispanic, black, and Caucasian youth: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  L K Bachrach; T Hastie; M C Wang; B Narasimhan; R Marcus
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 2.  Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.

Authors:  Phil Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike Clarke; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Sarah Pratap; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-18

3.  Risk for osteoporosis in black women.

Authors:  J F Aloia; A Vaswani; J K Yeh; E Flaster
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data.

Authors:  D R Carter; M L Bouxsein; R Marcus
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Body fat distribution in South Asian women and children.

Authors:  J Wardle; K Wrightson; L Gibson
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  1996-03

6.  Diets of Asian pregnant women in Harrow: iron and vitamins.

Authors:  R Abraham; M C Brown; W R North; I R McFadyen
Journal:  Hum Nutr Appl Nutr       Date:  1987-06

7.  Bone density in an immigrant population from Southeast Asia.

Authors:  M A Marquez; L J Melton; J M Muhs; C S Crowson; A Tosomeen; M K O'Connor; W M O'Fallon; B L Riggs
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Accuracy of electoral registers and Family Practitioner Committee lists for population studies of the very elderly.

Authors:  A Bowling; D Hart; A Silman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Generational continuity and change in British Asian health and health behaviour.

Authors:  R Williams; M Shams
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Comparative study of bone mineral density, calcium, and vitamin D status in the Gujarati and white populations of Leicester.

Authors:  C Hamson; L Goh; P Sheldon; A Samanta
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.401

View more
  11 in total

1.  Bone health in healthy Indian population aged 50 years and above.

Authors:  R K Marwaha; N Tandon; M K Garg; R Kanwar; A Narang; A Sastry; A Saberwal; K Bhadra; A Mithal
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Evaluation of compressive strength index of the femoral neck in Caucasians and chinese.

Authors:  Na Yu; Yong-Jun Liu; Yufang Pei; Lei Zhang; Shufeng Lei; Niraj R Kothari; Ding-You Li; Christopher J Papasian; James Hamilton; Ji-Qun Cai; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Racial/ethnic differences in bone mineral density among older women.

Authors:  Hae-Sung Nam; Sun-Seog Kweon; Jin-Su Choi; Joseph M Zmuda; P C Leung; Li-Yung Lui; Deanna D Hill; Alan L Patrick; Jane A Cauley
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Trabecular bone deficits among Vietnamese immigrants.

Authors:  L J Melton; M A Marquez; L K McCready; S J Achenbach; B L Riggs; S Amin; S Khosla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Prevalence and treatment rate of osteoporosis in patients undergoing total knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pei-Lun Xiao; Chi-Jen Hsu; Yong-Guang Ma; Ding Liu; Rong Peng; Xiang-He Xu; Hua-Ding Lu
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.617

6.  Differences in age-related bone mass of proximal femur between Chinese women and different ethnic women in the United States.

Authors:  Yan-Li Hou; Xian-Ping Wu; Xiang-Hang Luo; Hong Zhang; Xing-Zhi Cao; Y-B Jiang; Er-Yuan Liao
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 2.976

Review 7.  Ethnic differences in bone health.

Authors:  Ayse Zengin; Ann Prentice; Kate Anna Ward
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 5.555

8.  Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Scanning and Bone Health: The Pressing Need to Raise Awareness Amongst Pakistani Women.

Authors:  Farah Anwar; Hiba Iftekhar; Tasneem Taher; Syeda K Kazmi; Fatima Z Rehman; Minhal Humayun; Samar Mahmood
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-09-22

9.  Ethnic differences in bone geometry between White, Black and South Asian men in the UK.

Authors:  A Zengin; S R Pye; M J Cook; J E Adams; F C W Wu; T W O'Neill; K A Ward
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 10.  Ethnic Differences in Bone Microarchitecture.

Authors:  Ruth Durdin; Camille M Parsons; Elaine Dennison; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper; Kate Ward
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.