Literature DB >> 23810840

Childhood socioeconomic status and adult femoral neck bone strength: findings from the Midlife in the United States Study.

Arun S Karlamangla1, Takahiro Mori, Sharon S Merkin, Teresa E Seeman, Gail A Greendale, Neil Binkley, Carolyn J Crandall.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Bone acquisition in childhood impacts adult bone mass, and can be influenced by childhood socioeconomic conditions. Socioeconomic status is also associated with body weight which affects the load that bone is exposed to in a fall. We hypothesized that socioeconomic advantage in childhood is associated with greater bone strength relative to load in adulthood.
METHODS: Hip dual x-ray absorptiometry scans from 722 participants in the Midlife in the United States Study were used to measure femoral neck size and bone mineral density, and combined with body weight and height to create composite indices of femoral neck strength relative to load in different failure modes: compression, bending, and impact. A childhood socioeconomic advantage score was created for the same participants from parental education, self-rated financial status relative to others, and not being on welfare. Multiple linear regression was used to determine the association of childhood socioeconomic advantage with femoral neck composite strength indices, stratified by gender and race (white/non-white), and adjusted for study site, age, menopause status in women, education, and current financial advantage.
RESULTS: Childhood socioeconomic advantage was independently associated with higher indices of all three composite strength indices in white men (adjusted standardized effect sizes, 0.19 to 0.27, all p values<0.01), but not in the other three race/gender groups. Additional adjustment for adult obesity, physical activity in different life stages, smoking, and heavy drinking over the life-course significantly attenuated the associations in white men.
CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic disadvantage in childhood is associated with lower hip strength relative to load in white men, and these influences are dampened by healthy lifestyle choices.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone strength; Childhood socioeconomic advantage; Femoral neck; Health behaviors

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23810840      PMCID: PMC3784306          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  83 in total

1.  Reproducibility of a self-administered lifetime physical activity questionnaire among female college alumnae.

Authors:  Lisa Chasan-Taber; J Bianca Erickson; Jeanne W McBride; Philip C Nasca; Scott Chasan-Taber; Patty S Freedson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Racism, discrimination and hypertension: evidence and needed research.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Neighbors
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.847

3.  Diabetes and femoral neck strength: findings from the Hip Strength Across the Menopausal Transition Study.

Authors:  Shinya Ishii; Jane A Cauley; Carolyn J Crandall; Preethi Srikanthan; Gail A Greendale; Mei-Hua Huang; Michelle E Danielson; Arun S Karlamangla
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Bone mineral mass in males and females with and without Down syndrome.

Authors:  Fatima Baptista; Ana Varela; Luis B Sardinha
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Socioeconomic influences on bone health in postmenopausal women: findings from NHANES III, 1988-1994.

Authors:  May-Choo Wang; L Beth Dixon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Regulation of bone remodeling by the central and peripheral nervous system.

Authors:  Florent Elefteriou
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2008-03-23       Impact factor: 4.013

7.  Adult female twins' recall of childhood social class and father's education: a validation study for public health research.

Authors:  N Krieger; A Okamoto; J V Selby
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 8.  Geographic trends in incidence of hip fractures: a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  S Y Cheng; A R Levy; K A Lefaivre; P Guy; L Kuramoto; B Sobolev
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Lifetime leisure exercise and osteoporosis. The Rancho Bernardo study.

Authors:  G A Greendale; E Barrett-Connor; S Edelstein; S Ingles; R Haile
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  8 in total

1.  Childhood socioeconomic disadvantage and prediabetes and diabetes in later life: a study of biopsychosocial pathways.

Authors:  Vera Tsenkova; Tetyana Pudrovska; Arun Karlamangla
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.312

2.  Adult bone strength of children from single-parent families: the Midlife in the United States Study.

Authors:  C J Crandall; A S Karlamangla; S S Merkin; N Binkley; D Carr; G A Greendale; T E Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Retrospective reports of socioeconomic disadvantage in childhood and mortality risk: are associations consistent across measures and sex?

Authors:  Amanda E Ng; Rodman Turpin; Eric M Connor; Natalie Slopen
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 7.713

4.  Childhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage, Occupational, Leisure-Time, and Household Physical Activity, and Diabetes in Adulthood.

Authors:  Vera K Tsenkova; Chioun Lee; Jennifer Morozink Boylan
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2017-09-13

5.  Multisystem dysregulation and bone strength: findings from the study of midlife in the United States.

Authors:  Takahiro Mori; Arun S Karlamangla; Sharon Stein Merkin; Carolyn J Crandall; Neil Binkley; Gail A Greendale; Teresa E Seeman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Marital histories, marital support, and bone density: findings from the Midlife in the United States Study.

Authors:  D Miller-Martinez; T Seeman; A S Karlamangla; G A Greendale; N Binkley; C J Crandall
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Emotional and instrumental support during childhood and biological dysregulation in midlife.

Authors:  Natalie Slopen; Ying Chen; Naomi Priest; Michelle A Albert; David R Williams
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 8.  Factors influencing peak bone mass gain.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zhu; Houfeng Zheng
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 4.592

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.