Literature DB >> 8889856

Differences in bone mineral in young Asian and Caucasian Americans may reflect differences in bone size.

G S Bhudhikanok1, M C Wang, K Eckert, C Matkin, R Marcus, L K Bachrach.   

Abstract

Bone mineral content (BMC) and areal bone mineral density (BMD) have been reported to be lower in Asian than in Caucasian adults. To determine if racial differences in bone mass are present in younger subjects and whether they reflect differences in estimated volumetric bone density or in bone size, we compared measurements of bone mineral in healthy young Asian- and Caucasian-American males and females. Bone mineral was measured at the lumbar spine (L2-L4), femoral neck (FN), and whole body (WB) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 99 Asians (49 females, 50 males) and 103 Caucasians (54 females, 49 males) ages 9-26 years. Results were expressed as BMC, BMD, and apparent density (BMAD), an estimate of volumetric bone density that reduces the effect of bone size. Subjects were compared on the basis of chronological age as well as by Tanner stage to correct for potential differences in the timing of puberty. Habitual dietary intake and physical activity were also assessed and correlated with bone mineral. The Asian and Caucasian cohorts differed in body size, diet, and physical activity. Asian females were shorter than the Caucasian females at all stages of puberty and weighed less at pre-/early puberty (p < 0.05). Asian males were older than Caucasians at midpuberty (p < 0.01) and weighed less than the Caucasian males at pubertal maturity (p = 0.001). Asian youths also consumed less calcium and reported less weight-bearing activity. Racial differences were most apparent when comparing BMC data. Asian males had greater spine BMC at midpuberty and lower WB BMC at maturity (p < 0.05). Asian females had lower FN BMC through midpuberty and lower WB BMC in pre-/early puberty (p < 0.05). WB BMD and WB BMC/height values were significantly lower in mature Asian versus Caucasian males. No significant racial differences in BMAD were observed. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that the differences in BMD and BMAD between Asian and Caucasian subjects were largely attributable to differences in weight and pubertal stage, and, at the FN, in weight-bearing activity. Further, the explanatory variables were less strongly associated with BMAD than with BMD. In summary, no significant differences in BMD were found between Asian and Caucasian youths through midpuberty; however, WB BMD and WB BMC/height values were lower in Asian males at sexual maturity. We conclude that observed differences in bone mineral between Asians and Caucasians may be partially attributed to the smaller bone size of Asians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8889856     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650111023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  35 in total

1.  Relationship of body surface area with bone density and its risk of osteoporosis at various skeletal regions in women of mainland China.

Authors:  Xian-Ping Wu; Er-Yuan Liao; Shi-Ping Liu; Hong Zhang; Peng-Fei Shan; Xing-Zhi Cao; Yebin Jiang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Comparison of spine and femur reference data in native Chinese women from different regions of China.

Authors:  Xian-Ping Wu; Er-Yuan Liao; Ru-Chun Dai; Peng-Fei Shan; Tuan-Yu Fang; Xiang-Hang Luo; Yin-Zhen Pi; Yebin Jiang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Bone mineral density and leg muscle strength in young Caucasian, Hispanic, and Asian women.

Authors:  Michael T C Liang; Stanley Bassin; Darren Dutto; William Braun; Nathan Wong; Andria M Pontello; Dan M Cooper; Sara B Arnaud
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  Health fair report of Asian Americans in Michigan.

Authors:  Janilla Lee; Judy Chen; Lili Deng; Prasanna Parasurama
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2015-02

5.  Reference values of bone mineral density and prevalence of osteoporosis in Chinese adults.

Authors:  Z-Q Zhang; S C Ho; Z-Q Chen; C-X Zhang; Y-M Chen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Differences in bone quality and strength between Asian and Caucasian young men.

Authors:  A L Kepley; K K Nishiyama; B Zhou; J Wang; C Zhang; D J McMahon; K F Foley; M D Walker; X Edward Guo; E Shane; T L Nickolas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Application of high-resolution skeletal imaging to measurements of volumetric BMD and skeletal microarchitecture in Chinese-American and white women: explanation of a paradox.

Authors:  Marcella D Walker; Donald J McMahon; Julia Udesky; George Liu; John P Bilezikian
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Height and bone mineral density in androgen insensitivity syndrome with mutations in the androgen receptor gene.

Authors:  D L S Danilovic; P H S Correa; E M F Costa; K F S Melo; B B Mendonca; I J P Arnhold
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  A referent bone mineral density database for Chinese American women.

Authors:  M Donovan Walker; R Babbar; A R Opotowsky; A Rohira; F Nabizadeh; M Della Badia; W Chung; J Chiang; A Mediratta; D McMahon; G Liu; J P Bilezikian
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Is a 22 cm Ureteric Stent Appropriate for Korean Patients Smaller than 175 cm in Height?

Authors:  Byung Ki Lee; Sung Hyun Paick; Hyoung Keun Park; Hyeong Gon Kim; Yong Soo Lho
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-09-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.