| Literature DB >> 20814536 |
Jinglin Zhou1, Bin Xu, Bing Shi, Jing Huang, Wei He, Shengjun Lu, Junjun Lu, Liying Xiao, Wei Li.
Abstract
Mice models are an important way to understand the relation between the fetus with cleft palate and changes of maternal biofluid. This paper aims to develop a metabonomics approach to analyze dexamethasone-induced cleft palate in pregnant C57BL/6J mice and to study the relationship between the change of endogenous small molecular metabolites in maternal plasma and the incidence of cleft palate. To do so, pregnant mice were randomly divided into two groups. The one group was injected with dexamethasone. On E17.5th day, the incident rates of cleft palate from embryos in two groups were calculated. The (1)H-NMR spectra from the metabolites in plasma in two groups was collected at same time. Then the data were analyzed using metabonomics methods (PCA and SIMCA). The results showed that the data from the two groups displayed distinctive characters, and the incidence of cleft palate were significantly different (P < .005). To conclude, this study demonstrates that the metabonomics approach is a powerful and effective method in detecting the abnormal metabolites from mother in the earlier period of embryos, and supports the idea that a change from dexamethasone induced in maternal metabolites plays an important role in the incidence of cleft palate.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20814536 PMCID: PMC2931396 DOI: 10.1155/2011/509043
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Biotechnol ISSN: 1110-7243
Comparison of the incidence of cleft palate in the embryos between two groups.
| Non-Fusion | Fusion | Total | Incidence of non-fusion (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 3 | 103 | 106 | 2.83 |
| DEX group | 27 | 96 | 123 | 21.95* |
| Total | 30 | 199 | 229 | 13.10 |
*Significant difference with respect to control (χ2 = 18.285, P < .005).
Figure 1Photos of fusion or lack of fusion by embryonic palatal shelves. The fusion situation of embryonic palatal shelves was observed and photographed. (a) Fused embryonic palatal shelf. (b) Nonfused embryonic palatal shelf. (c) Fused embryonic palatal shelf in histological section. (d) Nonfused embryonic palatal shelf in histological section.
Figure 2600 MHz 1H-NMR spectra of plasma samples from the pregnant mice in two groups: “a” showed the spectrum from one sample in the control group; “b” showed the spectrum from one sample in the DEX group.
Figure 3The plot of PCA analysis from two groups. “▴” showed the data from pregnant mice with CP fetuses in DEX group; “□” showed the data from pregnant mice with fusion fetuses in control group. “∗” showed the pregnant mice including CP fetuses in the control group.
the main metabolites changes that were partially responsible for discriminating Dex group from control using PCA.
| 1H bucket region ( | metabolites | Changes in Dex group |
|---|---|---|
| 1.32, 4.12 | Lactate | ↑* |
| 1.36 | unknown | ↑ |
| 1.48 | Alanine CH3 | ↑ |
| 1.72 | Arginine( | ↓ |
| 1.92 | Arginine ( | ↓ |
| 2.02 | Acetate | ↑ |
| 2.04 | Lipid CH2CH2CH=CH | ↑ |
| 2.12 | Glutamine | ↑ |
| 2.28 | Valine ( | ↓ |
| 2.36 | Glutamate | ↑ |
| 2.4801 | unknown | ↑ |
| 2.5201 | Lipid –C=C–CH2–C=C | ↓ |
| 2.8 | Aspartic acid ( | ↓ |
| 3.24 | Choline N (CH3)3+ | ↑ |
| 3.64 | Valine ( | ↓ |
| 3.92 | Creatine | ↑ |
| 4.04 | myo-inositol | ↓ |
*↑, relative increase in signal by loading plot.
Figure 4The plots of PCA analysis for two control pregnant mice including CP fetuses in different groups “a” showed the PCA analysis between two outliers from the control group and the data of pregnant mice with CP fetuses in DEX group; “b” showed the PCA analysis between two outliers from the control group and the data of pregnant mice with no-CP fetuses in control group.
Figure 5The Cooman's plot of two groups in test set from SIMCA. “▴” showed the DEX group with CP fetuses; “□” showed the control group with fusion fetuses; “∗” showed two outlier samples (pregnant mice with CP fetuses in control group); the red lines indicate the D-Crit (0.05) level; two groups were located in two different spaces; the outliers not belong to either group.