Literature DB >> 22462152

Estimation based on case-control designs with known prevalence probability.

Mark J van der Laan1.   

Abstract

Regular case-control sampling is an extremely common design used to generate data to estimate effects of exposures or treatments on a binary outcome of interest when the proportion of cases (i.e., binary outcome equal to 1) in the population of interest is low. Case-control sampling represents a biased sample of a target population of interest by sampling a disproportional number of cases. Case-control studies are also commonly employed to estimate the effects of genetic markers or biomarkers on binary phenotypes. In this article we present a general method of estimation relying on knowing the prevalence probability, conditional on the matching variable if matching is used. Our general proposed methodology, involving a simple weighting scheme of cases and controls, maps any estimation method for a parameter developed for prospective sampling from the population of interest into an estimation method based on case-control sampling from this population. We show that this case-control weighting of an efficient estimator for a prospective sample from the target population of interest maps into an efficient estimator for matched and unmatched case-control sampling. In particular, we show how application of this generic methodology provides us with double robust locally efficient targeted maximum likelihood estimators of the causal relative risk and causal odds ratio for regular case control sampling and matched case control sampling. Various extensions and generalizations of our methods are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 22462152     DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biostat        ISSN: 1557-4679            Impact factor:   0.968


  24 in total

1.  Estimation and testing of the relative risk of disease in case-control studies with a set of k matched controls per case with known prevalence of disease.

Authors:  Barry Kurt Moser; Susan Halabi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Genetic variants on 15q25.1, smoking, and lung cancer: an assessment of mediation and interaction.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; Kofi Asomaning; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; Younghun Han; Margaret R Spitz; Sanjay Shete; Xifeng Wu; Valerie Gaborieau; Ying Wang; John McLaughlin; Rayjean J Hung; Paul Brennan; Christopher I Amos; David C Christiani; Xihong Lin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Power and instrument strength requirements for Mendelian randomization studies using multiple genetic variants.

Authors:  Brandon L Pierce; Habibul Ahsan; Tyler J Vanderweele
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Simple optimal weighting of cases and controls in case-control studies.

Authors:  Sherri Rose; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2008-09-29       Impact factor: 0.968

5.  Why match? Investigating matched case-control study designs with causal effect estimation.

Authors:  Sherri Rose; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 0.968

6.  Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Susan Gruber
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 0.968

7.  Exposure to Community Violence and Self-harm in California: A Multilevel, Population-based, Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Ellicott C Matthay; Kriszta Farkas; Jennifer Skeem; Jennifer Ahern
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  A targeted maximum likelihood estimator for two-stage designs.

Authors:  Sherri Rose; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 0.968

9.  Estimating the Effect of a Community-Based Intervention with Two Communities.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Maya Petersen; Wenjing Zheng
Journal:  J Causal Inference       Date:  2013-05

10.  Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for prediction calibration.

Authors:  Jordan Brooks; Mark J van der Laan; Alan S Go
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 0.968

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.