Literature DB >> 20813335

Consumers' views of pharmacogenetics--A qualitative study.

Catherine A Haddy1, Helena M Ward, Manya T Angley, Ross A McKinnon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adverse drug reactions are recognized as a significant public health issue. Pharmacogenetics (PGx) provides a potential means of preventing some adverse drug reactions by predicting the optimal medication dose for an individual; however, PGx is rarely used in clinical practice. Thus far, there have been few studies investigating consumers' perceptions of the barriers to the implementation of PGx in clinical practice.
OBJECTIVES: This study explored the views of the general public regarding their current use of medications, and their experiences of side effects and opinions on PGx.
METHODS: Members of the general public who suffered a chronic medical condition and/or had an immediate family member with a chronic medical condition were recruited to form 5 separate focus groups (n=35). Three separate age ranges were used in the focus groups. A questioning route was developed and used in focus groups to determine participants' experiences with medication use and opinions on PGx (referred to as "Personalized Medicine"). Focus group discussions were transcribed by 2 separate investigators, and qualitative analysis, based on the framework approach, was applied to the data. Data were independently coded to identify key themes then compared both within and between focus groups.
RESULTS: A common theme was a desire to have a holistic approach to disease diagnosis and medication selection. A wide range of views were expressed by the focus group participants. Concerns were raised regarding the current level of side effects experienced with medications. Storage and privacy of genetic information, and the costs involved, were also seen as potential barriers to implementation of PGx.
CONCLUSIONS: PGx testing was seen as a potential positive contribution, but only if other factors were considered during the prescribing process. As participants desired a high level of information and effective communication from their health-care professionals, PGx education of clinicians and pharmacists will be essential to satisfy consumers' requirements. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20813335     DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2009.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm        ISSN: 1551-7411


  22 in total

1.  Assessment of patient perceptions of genomic testing to inform pharmacogenomic implementation.

Authors:  Yee Ming Lee; Ryan P McKillip; Brittany A Borden; Catherine E Klammer; Mark J Ratain; Peter H O'Donnell
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Pharmacists' role in targeted cancer therapy in Australia and implications for pharmacy education.

Authors:  David M Plevin; Helena M Ward; Michael B Ward; Michael J Sorich; Ross A McKinnon
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Patient Perceptions of Care as Influenced by a Large Institutional Pharmacogenomic Implementation Program.

Authors:  R P McKillip; B A Borden; P Galecki; S A Ham; L Patrick-Miller; J P Hall; S Hussain; K Danahey; M Siegler; M J Sorrentino; Y Sacro; A M Davis; D T Rubin; K Lipstreuer; T S Polonsky; R Nanda; W R Harper; J L Koyner; D L Burnet; W M Stadler; M J Ratain; D O Meltzer; P H O'Donnell
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Patient experiences with pharmacogenetic testing in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Rachel Mills; Jivan Moaddeb; Nancy Allen Lapointe; Alex Cho; Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.533

5.  Opinions, hopes and concerns regarding pharmacogenomics: a comparison of healthy individuals, heart failure patients and heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  K Lachance; S Korol; E O'Meara; A Ducharme; N Racine; M Liszkowski; J L Rouleau; G B Pelletier; M Carrier; M White; S de Denus
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.550

6.  Clinical delivery of pharmacogenetic testing services: a proposed partnership between genetic counselors and pharmacists.

Authors:  Rachel Mills; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.533

7.  "Getting off the Bus Closer to Your Destination": Patients' Views about Pharmacogenetic Testing.

Authors:  Susan Brown Trinidad; Tara B Coffin; Stephanie M Fullerton; James Ralston; Gail P Jarvik; Eric B Larson
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2015-06-01

Review 8.  Ethical perspectives on translational pharmacogenetic research involving children.

Authors:  Parvaz Madadi
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.022

9.  Operational implementation of prospective genotyping for personalized medicine: the design of the Vanderbilt PREDICT project.

Authors:  J M Pulley; J C Denny; J F Peterson; G R Bernard; C L Vnencak-Jones; A H Ramirez; J T Delaney; E Bowton; K Brothers; K Johnson; D C Crawford; J Schildcrout; D R Masys; H H Dilks; R A Wilke; E W Clayton; E Shultz; M Laposata; J McPherson; J N Jirjis; D M Roden
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Risk, reward, and the double-edged sword: perspectives on pharmacogenetic research and clinical testing among Alaska Native people.

Authors:  Jennifer L Shaw; Renee Robinson; Helene Starks; Wylie Burke; Denise A Dillard
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.