Literature DB >> 20811893

Comparative study of femoral diaphyseal morphometry in two male populations, in France and a French West Indies island: an example of clinical relevance of comparative anatomy for orthopedic practice.

André-Pierre Uzel1, Jacqueline Deloumeaux, Jean-Louis Rouvillain, Georges-Yves Laflamme, Alain Durandeau, Philippe Caix.   

Abstract

Our aim, through a comparative study of two populations, one European and the other Afro-Caribbean, was to find out whether there were differences in radiographic measurements of femoral diaphyseal canal diameter, thickness of the medial and lateral cortex, and global diaphyseal diameter. We studied the nailed femurs of adult males in a population of 54 Europeans and 52 Afro-Caribbeans. Both populations were comparable in terms of age, height and weight. The measurements were taken with a ruler on the narrowest area of the hourglass, the isthmus, on an antero-posterior radiograph. The diameter of the femoral canal was classified into three intervals: <13 mm, 13-14 mm and >14 mm. The femoral canal diameter was significantly larger in the European patients, 14.3 (11-19) versus 13.4 (11-15.6), while the thickness of the lateral cortex was significantly larger in the Afro-Caribbean patients, 8.50 (6-12) versus 7.72 (5.4-11.5). Patient distribution according to the intervals was different in both groups: 59% of the Afro-Caribbeans were in the average interval versus 24.1% of the Europeans. For nearly 53.7% of the Europeans, the diameter of the femoral canal fell in the last interval versus 15.4% of the Afro-Caribbeans. The fact that the femoral canal is narrower in the Afro-Caribbean population may be linked to a thicker lateral cortex. The diameters of the nails used were larger in the European population, 12.6 mm (10-15) versus 12.1 mm (11-14) in the Afro-Caribbean population. The global diameters of both populations' femurs were similar (28.9 mm for the European sample vs. 29 mm). The present study may have an impact on the implants used in the orthopedic surgery (intramedullary nailing, arthroplasty implants). The range of usable implants must be complete and there must be precise pre-operative planning. A study of computed tomography scans could complement our measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20811893     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-010-0722-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  16 in total

1.  Transverse diameter of the femur: on roentgenograms and on bones.

Authors:  M Trotter; R R Peterson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1967 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Bone dimensional change with age: interactions of genetic, hormonal, and body size variables.

Authors:  R P Heaney; M J Barger-Lux; K M Davies; R A Ryan; M L Johnson; G Gong
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur.

Authors:  O Husmann; P J Rubin; P F Leyvraz; B de Roguin; J N Argenson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  [Radiologic changes of anatomic parameters of the proximal femur as a function of its position in rotation].

Authors:  P J Rubin; P F Leyvraz; J H Heegaard
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1989

5.  The anatomic basis of femoral component design.

Authors:  P C Noble; J W Alexander; L J Lindahl; D T Yew; W M Granberry; H S Tullos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  An analysis of the human femur.

Authors:  C L Lavelle
Journal:  Am J Anat       Date:  1974-11

7.  [Critical study of treatment failures of recent fractures of the femoral diaphysis. Apropos of 330 cases].

Authors:  J Benoit; Y Cirotteau; C Huard; B Tomeno
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1974-09

8.  A macroscopic study of the cross section of femur.

Authors:  J K Wei; T Suzuki
Journal:  Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn       Date:  1973-05

9.  Significance of study of the cross section shape of the shaft of the femur for the identification of skeletal fragments.

Authors:  M Dokládal
Journal:  Folia Morphol (Praha)       Date:  1972

10.  The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur.

Authors:  P C Noble; G G Box; E Kamaric; M J Fink; J W Alexander; H S Tullos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  5 in total

1.  The validity and reliability of preoperative radiographic canal diameter measurements of the femur.

Authors:  Kenneth P Walsh; John R Fowler; Oliver Chen; John P Gaughan; Sayed Ali; Mahin Rehman; Saqib Rehman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-06-21

2.  The effect of different torque wrenches on rotational stiffness in compressive femoral nails: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  A A Karaarslan; N Acar
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  A novel nail providing more biomechanical rotational and axial stability than conventional interlocking nail in femur complex fracture model.

Authors:  A A Karaarslan; N Acar; Y Örgen; H Aycan; F Ertem; E Sesli
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Characteristics of the Femoral Canal Isthmus: An Anatomical Study.

Authors:  Xiu-yun Su; Jing-xin Zhao; Zhe Zhao; Li-cheng Zhang; Chen Li; Jian-tao Li; Jian-feng Zhou; Li-hai Zhang; Pei-fu Tang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Optimal location of subtrochanteric osteotomy in total hip arthroplasty for crowe type IV developmental dysplasia of hip.

Authors:  Zhe-Yu Huang; Hua Liu; Ming Li; Jing Ling; Jun-Hui Zhang; Zhi-Min Zeng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.