BACKGROUND: Communication with family members of patients in intensive care units is challenging and fraught with dissatisfaction. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that family attendance at structured interdisciplinary family rounds would enhance communication and facilitate end-of-life planning (when appropriate). METHODS: The study was conducted in the 26-bed medical intensive care unit of a tertiary care, academic medical center from April through October 2006. Starting in July 2006, families were invited to attend daily interdisciplinary rounds where the medical team discussed the plan for care. Family members were surveyed at least 1 month after the patient's stay in the unit, completing the validated "Family Satisfaction in the ICU" tool before and after implementation of family rounds. RESULTS: Of 227 patients enrolled, 187 patients survived and 40 died. Among families of survivors, participation in family rounds was associated with higher family satisfaction regarding frequency of communication with physicians (P = .004) and support during decision making (P = .005). Participation decreased satisfaction regarding time for decision making (P = .02). Overall satisfaction scores did not differ between families who attended rounds and families who did not. For families of patients who died, participation in family rounds did not significantly change satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of this pilot study of family rounds, certain elements of satisfaction were improved, but not overall satisfaction. The findings indicate that structured interdisciplinary family rounds can improve some families' satisfaction, whereas some families feel rushed to make decisions. More work is needed to optimize communication between staff in the intensive care unit and patients' families, families' comprehension, and the effects on staff workload.
BACKGROUND: Communication with family members of patients in intensive care units is challenging and fraught with dissatisfaction. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that family attendance at structured interdisciplinary family rounds would enhance communication and facilitate end-of-life planning (when appropriate). METHODS: The study was conducted in the 26-bed medical intensive care unit of a tertiary care, academic medical center from April through October 2006. Starting in July 2006, families were invited to attend daily interdisciplinary rounds where the medical team discussed the plan for care. Family members were surveyed at least 1 month after the patient's stay in the unit, completing the validated "Family Satisfaction in the ICU" tool before and after implementation of family rounds. RESULTS: Of 227 patients enrolled, 187 patients survived and 40 died. Among families of survivors, participation in family rounds was associated with higher family satisfaction regarding frequency of communication with physicians (P = .004) and support during decision making (P = .005). Participation decreased satisfaction regarding time for decision making (P = .02). Overall satisfaction scores did not differ between families who attended rounds and families who did not. For families of patients who died, participation in family rounds did not significantly change satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of this pilot study of family rounds, certain elements of satisfaction were improved, but not overall satisfaction. The findings indicate that structured interdisciplinary family rounds can improve some families' satisfaction, whereas some families feel rushed to make decisions. More work is needed to optimize communication between staff in the intensive care unit and patients' families, families' comprehension, and the effects on staff workload.
Authors: J Randall Curtis; Ruth A Engelberg; Marjorie D Wenrich; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Sarah E Shannon; Patsy D Treece; Mark R Tonelli; Donald L Patrick; Lynne S Robins; Barbara B McGrath; Gordon D Rubenfeld Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: E Azoulay; S Chevret; G Leleu; F Pochard; M Barboteu; C Adrie; P Canoui; J R Le Gall; B Schlemmer Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Anna María Nápoles; Steven E Gregorich; Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson; Helen O'Brien; Anita L Stewart Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2009-03-31 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Daren K Heyland; Graeme M Rocker; Peter M Dodek; Demetrios J Kutsogiannis; Elsie Konopad; Deborah J Cook; Sharon Peters; Joan E Tranmer; Christopher J O'Callaghan Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Daren K Heyland; Deborah J Cook; Graeme M Rocker; Peter M Dodek; Demetrios J Kutsogiannis; Sharon Peters; Joan E Tranmer; Christopher J O'Callaghan Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2002-11-28 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Gary E Weissman; Lyle H Ungar; Michael O Harhay; Katherine R Courtright; Scott D Halpern Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Elizabeth D Cox; Gwen C Jacobsohn; Victoria P Rajamanickam; Pascale Carayon; Michelle M Kelly; Tosha B Wetterneck; Paul J Rathouz; Roger L Brown Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Rebecca A Aslakson; Lynn F Reinke; Christopher Cox; Erin K Kross; Roberto P Benzo; J Randall Curtis Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Christopher G Slatore; Lissi Hansen; Linda Ganzini; Nancy Press; Molly L Osborne; Mark S Chesnutt; Richard A Mularski Journal: Am J Crit Care Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 2.228