Literature DB >> 15343009

Half the family members of intensive care unit patients do not want to share in the decision-making process: a study in 78 French intensive care units.

Elie Azoulay1, Frédéric Pochard, Sylvie Chevret, Christophe Adrie, Djilali Annane, Gérard Bleichner, Caroline Bornstain, Yves Bouffard, Yves Cohen, Marc Feissel, Dany Goldgran-Toledano, Christophe Guitton, Jan Hayon, Esther Iglesias, Luc-Marie Joly, Mercé Jourdain, Christian Laplace, Christine Lebert, Juliette Pingat, Catherine Poisson, Anne Renault, Olivier Sanchez, Dominique Selcer, Jean-François Timsit, Jean-Roger Le Gall, Benoît Schlemmer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the opinions of intensive care unit staff and family members about family participation in decisions about patients in intensive care units in France, a country where the approach of physicians to patients and families has been described as paternalistic.
DESIGN: Prospective multiple-center survey of intensive care unit staff and family members.
SETTING: Seventy-eight intensive care units in university-affiliated hospitals in France. PATIENTS: We studied 357 consecutive patients hospitalized in the 78 intensive care units and included in the study starting on May 1, 2001, with five patients included per intensive care unit.
INTERVENTIONS: We recorded opinions and experience about family participation in medical decision making. Comprehension, satisfaction, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores were determined in family members.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Poor comprehension was noted in 35% of family members. Satisfaction was good but anxiety was noted in 73% and depression in 35% of family members. Among intensive care unit staff members, 91% of physicians and 83% of nonphysicians believed that participation in decision making should be offered to families; however, only 39% had actually involved family members in decisions. A desire to share in decision making was expressed by only 47% of family members. Only 15% of family members actually shared in decision making. Effectiveness of information influenced this desire.
CONCLUSION: Intensive care unit staff should seek to determine how much autonomy families want. Staff members must strive to identify practical and psychological obstacles that may limit their ability to promote autonomy. Finally, they must develop interventions and attitudes capable of empowering families.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15343009     DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000139693.88931.59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  52 in total

1.  Learned helplessness among families and surrogate decision-makers of patients admitted to medical, surgical, and trauma ICUs.

Authors:  Donald R Sullivan; Xinggang Liu; Douglas S Corwin; Avelino C Verceles; Michael T McCurdy; Drew A Pate; Jennifer M Davis; Giora Netzer
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Tolstoy on transparency and authority in end-of-life decision-making.

Authors:  Robert D Truog
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  An empirical study of surrogates' preferred level of control over value-laden life support decisions in intensive care units.

Authors:  Sara K Johnson; Christopher A Bautista; Seo Yeon Hong; Lisa Weissfeld; Douglas B White
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  End-of-Life Decision Making and Communication of Bereaved Family Members of African Americans with Serious Illness.

Authors:  Esther R Smith-Howell; Susan E Hickman; Salimah H Meghani; Susan M Perkins; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 5.  [Ethics consultations in intensive care medicine].

Authors:  T Bein; B M Graf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  Towards evidence based bioethics.

Authors:  Scott D Halpern
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-10-15

7.  Courts, doctors and end-of-life care.

Authors:  Malcolm M Fisher; Raymond F Raper
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Life-support limitation in the pre-hospital setting.

Authors:  Graeme Rocker
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Health technology assessment in critical care.

Authors:  Damon C Scales; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-10-20       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Attitudes to drug trials among relatives of unconscious intensive care patients.

Authors:  Anders Perner; Michael Ibsen; Jan Bonde
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.