Literature DB >> 20804850

Effects of physiological noise in population analysis of diffusion tensor MRI data.

Lindsay Walker1, Lin-Ching Chang, Cheng Guan Koay, Nik Sharma, Leonardo Cohen, Ragini Verma, Carlo Pierpaoli.   

Abstract

The goal of this study is to characterize the potential effect of artifacts originating from physiological noise on statistical analysis of diffusion tensor MRI (DTI) data in a population. DTI derived quantities including mean diffusivity (Trace(D)), fractional anisotropy (FA), and principal eigenvector (ε(1)) are computed in the brain of 40 healthy subjects from tensors estimated using two different methods: conventional nonlinear least-squares, and robust fitting (RESTORE). RESTORE identifies artifactual data points as outliers and excludes them on a voxel-by-voxel basis. We found that outlier data points are localized in specific spatial clusters in the population, indicating a consistency in brain regions affected across subjects. In brain parenchyma RESTORE slightly reduces inter-subject variance of FA and Trace(D). The dominant effect of artifacts, however, is bias. Voxel-wise analysis indicates that inclusion of outlier data points results in clusters of under- and over-estimation of FA, while Trace(D) is always over-estimated. Removing outliers affects ε(1) mostly in low anisotropy regions. It was found that brain regions known to be affected by cardiac pulsation - cerebellum and genu of the corpus callosum, as well as regions not previously reported, splenium of the corpus callosum-show significant effects in the population analysis. It is generally assumed that statistical properties of DTI data are homogenous across the brain. This assumption does not appear to be valid based on these results. The use of RESTORE can lead to a more accurate evaluation of a population, and help reduce spurious findings that may occur due to artifacts in DTI data. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20804850      PMCID: PMC2997122          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  31 in total

1.  Condition number as a measure of noise performance of diffusion tensor data acquisition schemes with MRI.

Authors:  S Skare; M Hedehus; M E Moseley; T Q Li
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  On the effects of gating in diffusion imaging of the brain using single shot EPI.

Authors:  S Skare; J L Andersson
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples.

Authors:  Thomas E Nichols; Andrew P Holmes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Respiration-induced B0 fluctuations and their spatial distribution in the human brain at 7 Tesla.

Authors:  Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Josef Pfeuffer; Gary H Glover; Kamil Ugurbil; Xiaoping Hu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain.

Authors:  C Pierpaoli; P Jezzard; P J Basser; A Barnett; G Di Chiro
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Deformable registration of diffusion tensor MR images with explicit orientation optimization.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Paul A Yushkevich; Daniel C Alexander; James C Gee
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Real-time shimming to compensate for respiration-induced B0 fluctuations.

Authors:  P van Gelderen; J A de Zwart; P Starewicz; R S Hinks; J H Duyn
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Analytically exact correction scheme for signal extraction from noisy magnitude MR signals.

Authors:  Cheng Guan Koay; Peter J Basser
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 2.229

9.  Volumetric neuroimage analysis extensions for the MIPAV software package.

Authors:  Pierre-Louis Bazin; Jennifer L Cuzzocreo; Michael A Yassa; William Gandler; Matthew J McAuliffe; Susan S Bassett; Dzung L Pham
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Toward a quantitative assessment of diffusion anisotropy.

Authors:  C Pierpaoli; P J Basser
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  35 in total

1.  Effects of image distortions originating from susceptibility variations and concomitant fields on diffusion MRI tractography results.

Authors:  M Okan Irfanoglu; Lindsay Walker; Joelle Sarlls; Stefano Marenco; Carlo Pierpaoli
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The diffusion tensor imaging toolbox.

Authors:  Jeffry R Alger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Assessing the performance of different DTI motion correction strategies in the presence of EPI distortion correction.

Authors:  Paul A Taylor; A Alhamud; Andre van der Kouwe; Muhammad G Saleh; Barbara Laughton; Ernesta Meintjes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Informed RESTORE: A method for robust estimation of diffusion tensor from low redundancy datasets in the presence of physiological noise artifacts.

Authors:  Lin-Ching Chang; Lindsay Walker; Carlo Pierpaoli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Investigating the prevalence of complex fiber configurations in white matter tissue with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ben Jeurissen; Alexander Leemans; Jacques-Donald Tournier; Derek K Jones; Jan Sijbers
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Analysis of the contribution of experimental bias, experimental noise, and inter-subject biological variability on the assessment of developmental trajectories in diffusion MRI studies of the brain.

Authors:  Neda Sadeghi; Amritha Nayak; Lindsay Walker; M Okan Irfanoglu; Paul S Albert; Carlo Pierpaoli
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Region of interest correction factors improve reliability of diffusion imaging measures within and across scanners and field strengths.

Authors:  Vijay K Venkatraman; Christopher E Gonzalez; Bennett Landman; Joshua Goh; David A Reiter; Yang An; Susan M Resnick
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Signal-to-noise assessment for diffusion tensor imaging with single data set and validation using a difference image method with data from a multicenter study.

Authors:  Zhiyue J Wang; Jonathan M Chia; Shaheen Ahmed; Nancy K Rollins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  On evidence, biases and confounding factors: Response to commentaries.

Authors:  Cibu Thomas; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Diffusion tensor imaging in young children with autism: biological effects and potential confounds.

Authors:  Lindsay Walker; Marta Gozzi; Rhoshel Lenroot; Audrey Thurm; Babak Behseta; Susan Swedo; Carlo Pierpaoli
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 13.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.