Literature DB >> 27436169

Assessing the performance of different DTI motion correction strategies in the presence of EPI distortion correction.

Paul A Taylor1,2,3, A Alhamud1, Andre van der Kouwe4, Muhammad G Saleh1, Barbara Laughton5, Ernesta Meintjes1.   

Abstract

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is susceptible to several artifacts due to eddy currents, echo planar imaging (EPI) distortion and subject motion. While several techniques correct for individual distortion effects, no optimal combination of DTI acquisition and processing has been determined. Here, the effects of several motion correction techniques are investigated while also correcting for EPI distortion: prospective correction, using navigation; retrospective correction, using two different popular packages (FSL and TORTOISE); and the combination of both methods. Data from a pediatric group that exhibited incidental motion in varying degrees are analyzed. Comparisons are carried while implementing eddy current and EPI distortion correction. DTI parameter distributions, white matter (WM) maps and probabilistic tractography are examined. The importance of prospective correction during data acquisition is demonstrated. In contrast to some previous studies, results also show that the inclusion of retrospective processing also improved ellipsoid fits and both the sensitivity and specificity of group tractographic results, even for navigated data. Matches with anatomical WM maps are highest throughout the brain for data that have been both navigated and processed using TORTOISE. The inclusion of both prospective and retrospective motion correction with EPI distortion correction is important for DTI analysis, particularly when studying subject populations that are prone to motion. Hum Brain Mapp 37:4405-4424, 2016.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diffusion tensor imaging; echo planar imaging volumetric navigator; fractional anisotropy; motion correction; tractography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27436169      PMCID: PMC5118068          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  39 in total

Review 1.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The B-matrix must be rotated when correcting for subject motion in DTI data.

Authors:  Alexander Leemans; Derek K Jones
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Retrospective head motion correction approaches for diffusion tensor imaging: Effects of preprocessing choices on biases and reproducibility of scalar diffusion metrics.

Authors:  Barbara A K Kreilkamp; Domenico Zacà; Nico Papinutto; Jorge Jovicich
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Diffusion imaging with prospective motion correction and reacquisition.

Authors:  Thomas Benner; André J W van der Kouwe; A Gregory Sorensen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Head motion during MRI acquisition reduces gray matter volume and thickness estimates.

Authors:  Martin Reuter; M Dylan Tisdall; Abid Qureshi; Randy L Buckner; André J W van der Kouwe; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Efficient correction of inhomogeneous static magnetic field-induced distortion in Echo Planar Imaging.

Authors:  Dominic Holland; Joshua M Kuperman; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Comprehensive approach for correction of motion and distortion in diffusion-weighted MRI.

Authors:  G K Rohde; A S Barnett; P J Basser; S Marenco; C Pierpaoli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Between session reproducibility and between subject variability of diffusion MR and tractography measures.

Authors:  E Heiervang; T E J Behrens; C E Mackay; M D Robson; H Johansen-Berg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Test-Retest Reliability of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Huntington's Disease.

Authors:  James H Cole; Ruth E Farmer; Elin M Rees; Hans J Johnson; Chris Frost; Rachael I Scahill; Nicola Z Hobbs
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2014-03-21

10.  Individual differences in impulsivity predict head motion during magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Xiang-Zhen Kong; Zonglei Zhen; Xueting Li; Huan-Hua Lu; Ruosi Wang; Ling Liu; Yong He; Yufeng Zang; Jia Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  21 in total

1.  The Superficial White Matter in Autism and Its Role in Connectivity Anomalies and Symptom Severity.

Authors:  Seok-Jun Hong; Brian Hyung; Casey Paquola; Boris C Bernhardt
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Minimisation of Signal Intensity Differences in Distortion Correction Approaches of Brain Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging.

Authors:  Dong-Hoon Lee; Do-Wan Lee; David Henry; Hae-Jin Park; Bong-Soo Han; Dong-Cheol Woo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Test-retest reliability of diffusion tensor imaging scalars in 5-year-olds.

Authors:  Aylin Rosberg; Jetro J Tuulari; Venla Kumpulainen; Minna Lukkarinen; Elmo P Pulli; Eero Silver; Anni Copeland; Ekaterina Saukko; Jani Saunavaara; John D Lewis; Linnea Karlsson; Hasse Karlsson; Harri Merisaari
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 5.399

Review 4.  What's new and what's next in diffusion MRI preprocessing.

Authors:  Chantal M W Tax; Matteo Bastiani; Jelle Veraart; Eleftherios Garyfallidis; M Okan Irfanoglu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 7.400

5.  Micro- and Macrostructural White Matter Integrity in Never-Treated and Currently Unmedicated Patients With Schizophrenia and Effects of Short-Term Antipsychotic Treatment.

Authors:  Nina Vanessa Kraguljac; Thomas Anthony; Frank Michael Skidmore; Jon Marstrander; Charity Johanna Morgan; Meredith Amanda Reid; David Matthew White; Ripu Daman Jindal; Nicholas Harry Melas Skefos; Adrienne Carol Lahti
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-01-23

6.  The impact of susceptibility correction on diffusion metrics in adolescents.

Authors:  Katri Lahti; Riitta Parkkola; Päivi Jääsaari; Leena Haataja; Virva Saunavaara
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-04-24

7.  White Matter Abnormalities in Children with HIV Infection and Exposure.

Authors:  Marcin Jankiewicz; Martha J Holmes; Paul A Taylor; Mark F Cotton; Barbara Laughton; André J W van der Kouwe; Ernesta M Meintjes
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 3.856

8.  Quantitative assessment of the susceptibility artefact and its interaction with motion in diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Mark S Graham; Ivana Drobnjak; Mark Jenkinson; Hui Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Test-retest reliability of high spatial resolution diffusion tensor and diffusion kurtosis imaging.

Authors:  Pashtun Shahim; Laurena Holleran; Joong H Kim; David L Brody
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Central white matter integrity alterations in 2-3-year-old children following prenatal alcohol exposure.

Authors:  Annerine Roos; Catherine J Wedderburn; Jean-Paul Fouche; Sivenesi Subramoney; Shantanu H Joshi; Roger P Woods; Heather J Zar; Katherine L Narr; Dan J Stein; Kirsten A Donald
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.