Literature DB >> 20800385

Intrafractional target motions and uncertainties of treatment setup reference systems in accelerated partial breast irradiation.

Ning J Yue1, Sharad Goyal, Jinghao Zhou, Atif J Khan, Bruce G Haffty.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study investigated the magnitude of intrafractional motion and level of accuracy of various setup strategies in accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: At lumpectomy, gold fiducial markers were strategically sutured to the surrounding walls of the cavity. Weekly fluoroscopy imaging was conducted at treatment to investigate the respiration-induced target motions. Daily pre- and post-RT kV imaging was performed, and images were matched to digitally reconstructed radiographs based on bony anatomy and fiducial markers, respectively, to determine the intrafractional motion magnitudes over the course of treatment. The positioning differences of the laser tattoo- and the bony anatomy-based setups compared with those of the marker-based setup (benchmark) were also determined. The study included 21 patients.
RESULTS: Although lung exhibited significant motion, the average marker motion amplitude on the fluoroscopic image was about 1 mm. Over a typical treatment time period, average intrafractional motion magnitude was 4.2 mm and 2.6 mm based on the marker and bony anatomy matching, respectively. The bony anatomy- and laser tattoo-based interfractional setup errors, with respect to the fiducial marker-based setup, were 7.1 and 9.0 mm, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Respiration has limited effects on the target motion during APBI. Bony anatomy-based treatment setup improves the accuracy relative to that of the laser tattoo-based setup approach. Since fiducial markers are sutured directly to the surgical cavity, the marker-based approach can further improve the interfractional setup accuracy. On average, a seroma cavity exhibits intrafractional motion of more than 4 mm, a magnitude that is larger than that which is otherwise derived based on bony anatomy matching. A seroma-specific marker-based approach has the potential to improve treatment accuracy by taking the true inter- and intrafractional motions into consideration.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20800385     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  13 in total

1.  Displacement of the lumpectomy cavity defined by surgical clips and seroma based on 4D-CT scan for external-beam partial breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery: a comparative study.

Authors:  Y Ding; J Li; W Wang; S Wang; T Fan; M Xu; Q Shao; Z Ma
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Optical and x-ray technology synergies enabling diagnostic and therapeutic applications in medicine.

Authors:  Brian W Pogue; Brian C Wilson
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  An image-guided study of setup reproducibility of postmastectomy breast cancer patients treated with inverse-planned intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Christine H Feng; Emily Gerry; Steven J Chmura; Yasmin Hasan; Hania A Al-Hallaq
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Residual image registration error by fiducial markers in accelerated partial breast irradiation using C-arm linac: a phantom study.

Authors:  Ryohei Yamauchi; Natsuki Murayoshi; Shinobu Akiyama; Norifumi Mizuno; Tomoyuki Masuda; Tomoko Itazawa; Jiro Kawamori
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2022-06-03

5.  Tumor bed radiotherapy in women following breast conserving surgery for breast cancer-safety margin with/without image guidance.

Authors:  Ales Hlavka; Jaroslav Vanasek; Karel Odrazka; Jan Stuk; Martin Dolezel; Vit Ulrych; Martina Vitkova; Jiri Mynarik; Iveta Kolarova; Zdenka Vilasova
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Optimization of Adjuvant Radiation in Breast Conservation Therapy: Can We Minimize without Compromise?

Authors:  Sophia M Edwards-Bennett; Candace R Correa; Eleanor E Harris
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-10-05

7.  Evaluation of the Flash effect in breast irradiation using TomoDirect: an investigational study.

Authors:  Dae Gyu Kang; Sung Ill Park; Sung Hwan Kim; Mi Joo Chung; Kwang-Man Lee; Jong Hoon Lee
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Stereotactic Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Rationale, Feasibility, and Early Experience Using the CyberKnife Radiosurgery Delivery Platform.

Authors:  Olusola Obayomi-Davies; Thomas P Kole; Bridget Oppong; Sonali Rudra; Erini V Makariou; Lloyd D Campbell; Hozaifa M Anjum; Sean P Collins; Keith Unger; Shawna Willey; Eleni Tousimis; Brian T Collins
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Comprehensive target geometric errors and margin assessment in stereotactic partial breast irradiation.

Authors:  Xin Zhen; Bo Zhao; Zhuoyu Wang; Robert Timmerman; Ann Spangler; Nathan Kim; Asal Rahimi; Xuejun Gu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Surface imaging-based analysis of intrafraction motion for breast radiotherapy patients.

Authors:  David B Wiant; Stacy Wentworth; Jacqueline M Maurer; Caroline L Vanderstraeten; Jonathon A Terrell; Benjamin J Sintay
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.