Literature DB >> 20798973

Tracking delays in report availability caused by incorrect exam status with Web-based issue tracking: a quality initiative.

Omer Abdulrehman Awan1, Frans van Wagenberg, Mark Daly, Nabile Safdar, Paul Nagy.   

Abstract

Many radiology information systems (RIS) cannot accept a final report from a dictation reporting system before the exam has been completed in the RIS by a technologist. A radiologist can still render a report in a reporting system once images are available, but the RIS and ancillary systems may not get the results because of the study's uncompleted status. This delay in completing the study caused an alarming number of delayed reports and was undetected by conventional RIS reporting techniques. We developed a Web-based reporting tool to monitor uncompleted exams and automatically page section supervisors when a report was being delayed by its incomplete status in the RIS. Institutional Review Board exemption was obtained. At four imaging centers, a Python script was developed to poll the dictation system every 10 min for exams in five different modalities that were signed by the radiologist but could not be sent to the RIS. This script logged the exams into an existing Web-based tracking tool using PHP and a MySQL database. The script also text-paged the modality supervisor. The script logged the time at which the report was finally sent, and statistics were aggregated onto a separate Web-based reporting tool. Over a 1-year period, the average number of uncompleted exams per month and time to problem resolution decreased at every imaging center and in almost every imaging modality. Automated feedback provides a vital link in improving technologist performance and patient care without assigning a human resource to manage report queues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20798973      PMCID: PMC3056982          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-010-9330-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  12 in total

1.  The application of the Six Sigma program for the quality management of the PACS.

Authors:  Jin Oh Kang; Myoung Ho Kim; Seong Eon Hong; Jae Ho Jung; Mi Jin Song
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Implementation of online radiology quality assurance reporting system for performance improvement: initial evaluation.

Authors:  Jonathan B Kruskal; Chun S Yam; Jacob Sosna; Donna T Hallett; Yolanda J Milliman; Herbert Y Kressel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Basics of imaging informatics. Part 1.

Authors:  Barton F Branstetter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The American board of radiology perspective on maintenance of certification: part IV--practice quality improvement for diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  Janet L Strife; Larry E Kun; Gary J Becker; N Reed Dunnick; Jennifer Bosma; Robert R Hattery
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Defining quality in radiology.

Authors:  C Craig Blackmore
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Editorial: quality initiatives in radiology: historical perspectives for an emerging field.

Authors:  Jonathan B Kruskal
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Outsourcing: a primer for radiologists.

Authors:  Daniel J Altman; Richard B Gunderman
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Expediting the turnaround of radiology reports in a teaching hospital setting.

Authors:  S E Seltzer; P Kelly; D F Adams; B F Chiango; M A Viera; E Fener; S Hooton; S Bannon-Rohrbach; C D Healy; P M Doubilet; B L Holman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Expediting the turnaround of radiology reports: use of total quality management to facilitate radiologists' report signing.

Authors:  S E Seltzer; P Kelly; D F Adams; B F Chiango; M A Viera; E Fener; R Rondeau; N Kazanjian; G Laffel; K Shaffer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Improving report turnaround time: an integrated method using data from a radiology information system.

Authors:  J P Crabbe; C L Frank; W W Nye
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  3 in total

1.  Study of Radiologic Technologists' Perceptions of Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) Competence and Educational Issues in Western Australia.

Authors:  Daniel M Floyd; Errol R Trepp; Maryam Ipaki; Curtise K C Ng
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  A silver bullet? The role of radiology information system data mining in defining gunshot injury trends at a South African tertiary-level hospital.

Authors:  Dale K Creamer; Asif Bagadia; Clive Daniels; Richard D Pitcher
Journal:  SA J Radiol       Date:  2021-03-02

Review 3.  The effectiveness of service delivery initiatives at improving patients' waiting times in clinical radiology departments: a systematic review.

Authors:  B Olisemeke; Y F Chen; K Hemming; A Girling
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.056

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.