Literature DB >> 8140990

Expediting the turnaround of radiology reports: use of total quality management to facilitate radiologists' report signing.

S E Seltzer1, P Kelly, D F Adams, B F Chiango, M A Viera, E Fener, R Rondeau, N Kazanjian, G Laffel, K Shaffer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether total quality management techniques could be used to speed radiologists' performance on the task of signing reports. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Total quality management represents a group of tools that can be used to improve the functioning of complex processes in the workplace. The steps involved in our total quality management project were as follows: (1) commit to improving radiologists' performance, (2) commission an interdisciplinary study team, (3) propose hypotheses for the causes of signing delays, (4) identify the key issues constraining performance (Pareto analysis), (5) intervene to correct systematic problems in a test system, (6) evaluate the results of intervention on radiologists' report signing performance, and (7) hold the gains achieved by the intervention. An interdisciplinary study team identified five key obstacles to prompt signing of reports: (1) radiologists' absence from the department when reports were available for signing (e.g., nights and weekends), (2) dysfunctional hand-off between transcriptionist and radiologist, (3) requirement that a fellow or resident sign before a staff radiologist, (4) lack of a system for signing by proxy (if primary radiologist is away), (5) perceived lack of impact of signed report on clinical decision making.
RESULTS: Interventions included (1) providing home computer terminals, (2) implementing a buddy system for proxy signing, (3) eliminating the requirement for a signature from a fellow or resident, (4) teaming groups of radiologists with specific transcriptionists, and (5) streamlining transcription service. When these enhancements were used in a test system, the mean time required to sign reports decreased 59% from 26.0 +/- 8.4 hr (mean +/- standard error) in the baseline period to 10.6 +/- 2.9 hr (in the enhanced period, p = .05).
CONCLUSION: We conclude that total quality management methods can accelerate radiologists' signing of reports.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8140990     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.162.4.8140990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  11 in total

1.  Enhancing the expressiveness of structured reporting systems.

Authors:  C P Langlotz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Enhancing the expressiveness and usability of structured image reporting systems.

Authors:  C P Langlotz; L Meininger
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

3.  Structured reporting using a shared indexed multilingual radiology lexicon.

Authors:  Roberto Stramare; Giuliano Scattolin; Valeria Beltrame; Marco Gerardi; Marco Sommavilla; Cristina Gatto; Paolo Mosca; Leopoldo Rubaltelli; Carlo Riccardo Rossi; Claudio Saccavini
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Notification System to Address PACS Filter Deficiencies and Ensure Timely Interpretation of Neonatal Exams.

Authors:  Ross Filice
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Six characteristics of effective structured reporting and the inevitable integration with speech recognition.

Authors:  David Liu; Mark Zucherman; William B Tulloss
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Preventing physician quality of life from impinging on patient quality of care: weakening the weekend effect.

Authors:  Marc D Basson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Learning curve of speech recognition.

Authors:  Tomi A Kauppinen; Johanna Kaipio; Mika P Koivikko
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Is there an association between radiologist turnaround time of emergency department abdominal CT studies and radiologic report quality?

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; John A Bonavita; Mark P Foran; Brent W Matza; John M McMenamy
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-10-03

9.  Identifying radiological needs of referring clinicians.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Antje Hefke; Jens Figiel; Ulrike Schwarz; Marga Rominger; Klaus Jochen Klose
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Tracking delays in report availability caused by incorrect exam status with Web-based issue tracking: a quality initiative.

Authors:  Omer Abdulrehman Awan; Frans van Wagenberg; Mark Daly; Nabile Safdar; Paul Nagy
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.