Literature DB >> 17412271

Defining quality in radiology.

C Craig Blackmore1.   

Abstract

The introduction of pay for performance in medicine represents an opportunity for radiologists to define quality in radiology. Radiology quality can be defined on the basis of the production model that currently drives reimbursement, codifying the role of radiologists as being limited to the production of timely and accurate radiology reports produced in conditions of maximum patient safety and communicated in a timely manner. Alternately, quality in radiology can also encompass the professional role of radiologists as diagnostic imaging specialists responsible for the appropriate use, selection, interpretation, and application of imaging. Although potentially challenging to implement, the professional model for radiology quality is a comprehensive assessment of the ways in which radiologists add value to patient care. This essay is a discussion of the definition of radiology quality and the implications of that definition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17412271     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  10 in total

1.  Prediction of prostate cancer extracapsular extension with high spatial resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced 3-T MRI.

Authors:  B Nicolas Bloch; Elizabeth M Genega; Daniel N Costa; Ivan Pedrosa; Martin P Smith; Herbert Y Kressel; Long Ngo; Martin G Sanda; William C Dewolf; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Implementation of a Point-of-Care Radiologist-Technologist Communication Tool in a Quality Assurance Program.

Authors:  Leonard Ong; Pierre Elnajjar; C Gregory Nyman; Thomas Mair; Krishna Juluru
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  The evolving role of radiologists within the health care system.

Authors:  Paul Martin Knechtges; Ruth C Carlos
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  The quality movement or making radiology fun again.

Authors:  C Craig Blackmore
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2015-02-12

5.  Recall of structured radiology reports is significantly superior to that of unstructured reports.

Authors:  Bryan W Buckley; Leslie Daly; Grainne N Allen; Carole A Ridge
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Tracking delays in report availability caused by incorrect exam status with Web-based issue tracking: a quality initiative.

Authors:  Omer Abdulrehman Awan; Frans van Wagenberg; Mark Daly; Nabile Safdar; Paul Nagy
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 7.  Defining Quality in Cardiovascular Imaging: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Ron Blankstein; Jill E Jacobs; Jonathon A Leipsic; Raymond Y Kwong; Viviany R Taqueti; Rob S B Beanlands; Jennifer H Mieres; Scott D Flamm; Thomas C Gerber; John Spertus; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 7.792

8.  In defense of body CT.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Luís Guimarães; Joel G Fletcher
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Biopsy of the same organ within 30 days: a potential radiology performance measure.

Authors:  Sonia Gaur; Prasad R Shankar; Ellen Higgins; Angy Perez Martinez; Elizabeth Lee; Matthew S Davenport
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-05-08

10.  Managing waiting times in diagnostic medical imaging.

Authors:  Sabina Nuti; Milena Vainieri
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.