Literature DB >> 24888629

The effectiveness of service delivery initiatives at improving patients' waiting times in clinical radiology departments: a systematic review.

B Olisemeke1, Y F Chen, K Hemming, A Girling.   

Abstract

We reviewed the literature for the impact of service delivery initiatives (SDIs) on patients' waiting times within radiology departments. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, INSPEC and The Cochrane Library for relevant articles published between 1995 and February, 2013. The Cochrane EPOC risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias on studies that met specified design criteria. Fifty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The types of SDI implemented included extended scope practice (ESP, three studies), quality management (12 studies), productivity-enhancing technologies (PETs, 29 studies), multiple interventions (11 studies), outsourcing and pay-for-performance (one study each). The uncontrolled pre- and post-intervention and the post-intervention designs were used in 54 (95%) of the studies. The reporting quality was poor: many of the studies did not test and/or report the statistical significance of their results. The studies were highly heterogeneous, therefore meta-analysis was inappropriate. The following type of SDIs showed promising results: extended scope practice; quality management methodologies including Six Sigma, Lean methodology, and continuous quality improvement; productivity-enhancing technologies including speech recognition reporting, teleradiology and computerised physician order entry systems. We have suggested improved study design and the mapping of the definitions of patient waiting times in radiology to generic timelines as a starting point for moving towards a situation where it becomes less restrictive to compare and/or pool the results of future studies in a meta-analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24888629      PMCID: PMC4391068          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-014-9706-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  125 in total

1.  Significant savings in radiologic report turnaround time after implementation of a complete picture archiving and communication system (PACS).

Authors:  A A Twair; W C Torreggiani; S M Mahmud; N Ramesh; B Hogan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  24-hour radiology coverage.

Authors:  R Fitzgerald
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Impact of electronic signature on radiology report turnaround time.

Authors:  Luigi Lepanto
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Impact of PACS deployment strategy on dictation turnaround time of chest radiographs.

Authors:  Luigi Lepanto; Guy Paré; Alain Gauvin
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  The effect of teleradiology on time to interpretation for CT pulmonary angiographic studies.

Authors:  Scott Kennedy; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Jonathan H Sunshine; Howard P Forman
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Improvement of report workflow and productivity using speech recognition--a follow-up study.

Authors:  Tomi Kauppinen; Mika P Koivikko; Juhani Ahovuo
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  A Lean Six Sigma journey in radiology.

Authors:  Ronald V Bucci; Anne Musitano
Journal:  Radiol Manage       Date:  2011 May-Jun

8.  The impact of extended radiology attending coverage in a children's hospital.

Authors:  R I Markowitz; J S Meyer; J A Hegman; K E Fellows
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1998-03

9.  Patient throughput times for orthopedic outpatients in a department of radiology: results of an interdisciplinary quality management program.

Authors:  J Hodler; J Strehle; J Schilling; M Zanetti; C Gerber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Computerized physician order entry of diagnostic tests in an intensive care unit is associated with improved timeliness of service.

Authors:  Willie Thompson; Peter M Dodek; Monica Norena; Jordana Dodek
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Risk management in radiology departments.

Authors:  Horea Craciun; Kshitij Mankad; Jeremy Lynch
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-06-28

2.  Frequency and analysis of non-clinical errors made in radiology reports using the National Integrated Medical Imaging System voice recognition dictation software.

Authors:  R E Motyer; S Liddy; W C Torreggiani; O Buckley
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Using Quality Improvement Methodology to Reduce Costs while Improving Efficiency and Provider Satisfaction in a Busy, Academic Musculoskeletal Radiology Division.

Authors:  Steven J Baccei; Scott R Henderson; Hao S Lo; Kevin Reynolds
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Gauging potential risk for patients in pediatric radiology by review of over 2,000 incident reports.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Snyder; Wei Zhang; Kimberly Chua Jasmin; Sam Thankachan; Lane F Donnelly
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-08-29

5.  Strategies for assessing renal function prior to outpatient contrast-enhanced CT: a UK survey.

Authors:  Martine Ann Harris; Beverly Snaith; Ruth Clarke
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Factors associated with No-Shows and rescheduling MRI appointments.

Authors:  Majeed O AlRowaili; Anwar E Ahmed; Hasan A Areabi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.