BACKGROUND: Protocol-eligible subjects may not be candidates for research participation or may decline. To determine factors that affected accrual, we evaluated enrollment in BABY HUG, a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase III trial of hydroxyurea (HU) in infants with sickle cell anemia. METHODS: An anonymized registry of potential subjects served as the primary source of data. Study coordinators considered all infants less than age 18 months with a hemoglobin FS diagnosis on newborn screening. Data included the number of potentially eligible subjects, whether parents were approached, and reasons for participating or declining. RESULTS:Of 1106 potential participants, 28% were not approached for reasons such as prior poor adherence to clinical care. Interested families expressed willingness to contribute to medical knowledge (51%), hope of being randomized to receive hydroxyurea (51%), and desire for closer clinical care (51%) as reasons for participating. Disease severity or the perception that their child was ill had less impact on willingness to participate (16%). Parents who declined cited fear of research (19%), transportation problems (14%), and the demanding nature of the study (25%). Ultimately, 234 (21%) gave informed consent, with little variability of acceptance rates among sites. Importantly, the number of subjects enrolled correlated with the number of families that were approached. Sites that excluded patients based on clinical/psychosocial biases were not more successful in recruiting than those who approached all eligible subjects. CONCLUSION: Large, demanding clinical trials require an adequate pool of potential participants. Approaching all potentially eligible patients without predetermined biases enhances success in recruitment.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Protocol-eligible subjects may not be candidates for research participation or may decline. To determine factors that affected accrual, we evaluated enrollment in BABY HUG, a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase III trial of hydroxyurea (HU) in infants with sickle cell anemia. METHODS: An anonymized registry of potential subjects served as the primary source of data. Study coordinators considered all infants less than age 18 months with a hemoglobin FS diagnosis on newborn screening. Data included the number of potentially eligible subjects, whether parents were approached, and reasons for participating or declining. RESULTS: Of 1106 potential participants, 28% were not approached for reasons such as prior poor adherence to clinical care. Interested families expressed willingness to contribute to medical knowledge (51%), hope of being randomized to receive hydroxyurea (51%), and desire for closer clinical care (51%) as reasons for participating. Disease severity or the perception that their child was ill had less impact on willingness to participate (16%). Parents who declined cited fear of research (19%), transportation problems (14%), and the demanding nature of the study (25%). Ultimately, 234 (21%) gave informed consent, with little variability of acceptance rates among sites. Importantly, the number of subjects enrolled correlated with the number of families that were approached. Sites that excluded patients based on clinical/psychosocial biases were not more successful in recruiting than those who approached all eligible subjects. CONCLUSION: Large, demanding clinical trials require an adequate pool of potential participants. Approaching all potentially eligible patients without predetermined biases enhances success in recruitment.
Authors: Jean G Ford; Mollie W Howerton; Gabriel Y Lai; Tiffany L Gary; Shari Bolen; M Chris Gibbons; Jon Tilburt; Charles Baffi; Teerath Peter Tanpitukpongse; Renee F Wilson; Neil R Powe; Eric B Bass Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: P N Lara; R Higdon; N Lim; K Kwan; M Tanaka; D H Lau; T Wun; J Welborn; F J Meyers; S Christensen; R O'Donnell; C Richman; S A Scudder; J Tuscano; D R Gandara; K S Lam Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M K Campbell; C Snowdon; D Francis; D Elbourne; A M McDonald; R Knight; V Entwistle; J Garcia; I Roberts; A Grant; A Grant Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Dionna O Roberts; Brittany Covert; Mark J Rodeghier; Nagina Parmar; Michael R DeBaun; Alexis A Thompson; Robert I Liem Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2014-04-22 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Oluwakemi Badaki-Makun; J Paul Scott; Julie A Panepinto; T Charles Casper; Cheryl A Hillery; J Michael Dean; David C Brousseau Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2014-01-17 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Evelyn M Stevens; Chavis A Patterson; Yimei B Li; Kim Smith-Whitley; Lamia P Barakat Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Jeffrey D Lebensburger; Robert F Sidonio; Michael R Debaun; Monika M Safford; Thomas H Howard; Isabel C Scarinci Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2013-02-15 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Marlene H Peters-Lawrence; Margaret C Bell; Lewis L Hsu; Ifeyinwa Osunkwo; Phillip Seaman; Miren Blackwood; Edouard Guillaume; Rita Bellevue; Lakshmanan Krishnamurti; Wally R Smith; Carlton D Dampier; Caterina P Minniti Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2011-12-02 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Judith W Dexheimer; Huaxiu Tang; Andrea Kachelmeyer; Melanie Hounchell; Stephanie Kennebeck; Imre Solti; Yizhao Ni Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 1.454
Authors: Courtney D Thornburg; Beatrice A Files; Zhaoyu Luo; Scott T Miller; Ram Kalpatthi; Rathi Iyer; Phillip Seaman; Jeffrey Lebensburger; Ofelia Alvarez; Bruce Thompson; Russell E Ware; Winfred C Wang Journal: Blood Date: 2012-08-22 Impact factor: 22.113