Literature DB >> 20797449

Recruitment of infants with sickle cell anemia to a Phase III trial: data from the BABY HUG study.

Lynn Wynn1, Scott Miller, Lane Faughnan, Zhaoyu Luo, Ellen Debenham, Lea Adix, Billie Fish, Tally Hustace, Tracy Kelly, Marylou Macdermott, Joan Marasciulo, Brenda Martin, Jennifer McDuffie, Mary Murphy, Betsy Rackoff, Caroline Reed, Phillip Seaman, Glenda Thomas, Winfred Wang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Protocol-eligible subjects may not be candidates for research participation or may decline. To determine factors that affected accrual, we evaluated enrollment in BABY HUG, a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase III trial of hydroxyurea (HU) in infants with sickle cell anemia.
METHODS: An anonymized registry of potential subjects served as the primary source of data. Study coordinators considered all infants less than age 18 months with a hemoglobin FS diagnosis on newborn screening. Data included the number of potentially eligible subjects, whether parents were approached, and reasons for participating or declining.
RESULTS: Of 1106 potential participants, 28% were not approached for reasons such as prior poor adherence to clinical care. Interested families expressed willingness to contribute to medical knowledge (51%), hope of being randomized to receive hydroxyurea (51%), and desire for closer clinical care (51%) as reasons for participating. Disease severity or the perception that their child was ill had less impact on willingness to participate (16%). Parents who declined cited fear of research (19%), transportation problems (14%), and the demanding nature of the study (25%). Ultimately, 234 (21%) gave informed consent, with little variability of acceptance rates among sites. Importantly, the number of subjects enrolled correlated with the number of families that were approached. Sites that excluded patients based on clinical/psychosocial biases were not more successful in recruiting than those who approached all eligible subjects.
CONCLUSION: Large, demanding clinical trials require an adequate pool of potential participants. Approaching all potentially eligible patients without predetermined biases enhances success in recruitment.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20797449      PMCID: PMC2975355          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  16 in total

1.  A study on recruitment of black Americans into clinical trials through a cultural competence lens.

Authors:  F H Outlaw; J N Bourjolly; F K Barg
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.592

Review 2.  A research agenda for understanding participation in clinical research.

Authors:  Deborah Gross
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 3.  Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jean G Ford; Mollie W Howerton; Gabriel Y Lai; Tiffany L Gary; Shari Bolen; M Chris Gibbons; Jon Tilburt; Charles Baffi; Teerath Peter Tanpitukpongse; Renee F Wilson; Neil R Powe; Eric B Bass
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment.

Authors:  P N Lara; R Higdon; N Lim; K Kwan; M Tanaka; D H Lau; T Wun; J Welborn; F J Meyers; S Christensen; R O'Donnell; C Richman; S A Scudder; J Tuscano; D R Gandara; K S Lam
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  African Americans' participation in clinical research: importance, barriers, and solutions.

Authors:  Richard D Branson; Kenneth Davis; Karyn L Butler
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 6.  Barriers to participation in clinical trials of cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review of patient-reported factors.

Authors:  Edward J Mills; Dugald Seely; Beth Rachlis; Lauren Griffith; Ping Wu; Kumanan Wilson; Peter Ellis; James R Wright
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 7.  Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrollment and participation study. The STEPS study.

Authors:  M K Campbell; C Snowdon; D Francis; D Elbourne; A M McDonald; R Knight; V Entwistle; J Garcia; I Roberts; A Grant; A Grant
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.014

8.  Participation of children in clinical research: factors that influence a parent's decision to consent.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Shobha Malviya
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Parents' attitudes to children's participation in randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Patrina H y Caldwell; Phyllis N Butow; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  What motivates British parents to consent for research? A questionnaire study.

Authors:  Helen M Sammons; Maria Atkinson; Imti Choonara; Terence Stephenson
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 2.125

View more
  20 in total

1.  Fragile X syndrome clinical trials: exploring parental decision-making.

Authors:  C S D'Amanda; H L Peay; A C Wheeler; E Turbitt; B B Biesecker
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2019-02-12

2.  Randomization is not associated with socio-economic and demographic factors in a multi-center clinical trial of children with sickle cell anemia.

Authors:  Dionna O Roberts; Brittany Covert; Mark J Rodeghier; Nagina Parmar; Michael R DeBaun; Alexis A Thompson; Robert I Liem
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Intravenous magnesium for pediatric sickle cell vaso-occlusive crisis: methodological issues of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Oluwakemi Badaki-Makun; J Paul Scott; Julie A Panepinto; T Charles Casper; Cheryl A Hillery; J Michael Dean; David C Brousseau
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Mistrust of Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease Clinical Trials Research.

Authors:  Evelyn M Stevens; Chavis A Patterson; Yimei B Li; Kim Smith-Whitley; Lamia P Barakat
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 5.  Interventions for chronic kidney disease in people with sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Noemi Ba Roy; Patricia M Fortin; Katherine R Bull; Carolyn Doree; Marialena Trivella; Sally Hopewell; Lise J Estcourt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-03

6.  Exploring barriers and facilitators to clinical trial enrollment in the context of sickle cell anemia and hydroxyurea.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Lebensburger; Robert F Sidonio; Michael R Debaun; Monika M Safford; Thomas H Howard; Isabel C Scarinci
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  Clinical trial implementation and recruitment: lessons learned from the early closure of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Marlene H Peters-Lawrence; Margaret C Bell; Lewis L Hsu; Ifeyinwa Osunkwo; Phillip Seaman; Miren Blackwood; Edouard Guillaume; Rita Bellevue; Lakshmanan Krishnamurti; Wally R Smith; Carlton D Dampier; Caterina P Minniti
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  A Time-and-Motion Study of Clinical Trial Eligibility Screening in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

Authors:  Judith W Dexheimer; Huaxiu Tang; Andrea Kachelmeyer; Melanie Hounchell; Stephanie Kennebeck; Imre Solti; Yizhao Ni
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.454

9.  Impact of hydroxyurea on clinical events in the BABY HUG trial.

Authors:  Courtney D Thornburg; Beatrice A Files; Zhaoyu Luo; Scott T Miller; Ram Kalpatthi; Rathi Iyer; Phillip Seaman; Jeffrey Lebensburger; Ofelia Alvarez; Bruce Thompson; Russell E Ware; Winfred C Wang
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Attitudes toward clinical trials among patients with sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Carlton Haywood; Sophie Lanzkron; Marie Diener-West; Jennifer Haythornthwaite; John J Strouse; Shawn Bediako; Gladys Onojobi; Mary Catherine Beach
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.