Literature DB >> 20737820

The effect of cash lottery on response rates to an online health survey among members of the Canadian Association of Retired Persons: a randomized experiment.

Paul Doerfling1, Jacek A Kopec, Matthew H Liang, John M Esdaile.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were 1) to assess the effect of cash lottery on participation rates in a web-based study of physical activity and joint health and 2) to compare recruitment via direct e-mail versus advertisement in an online newsletter.
METHODS: A sample of 1,150 individuals, randomly selected from a database of members of the Canadian Association of Retired Persons (CARP), was e-mailed a request to participate in an online survey, with follow-up e-mails after 1 and 2 weeks. The sample was randomly split into two groups. Half the sample was offered entry into a cash draw with a $500 grand prize and five $100 prizes, whereas the other half was not offered any incentive. In addition, a brief advertisement about the survey (without an incentive) was placed in an online newsletter that was circulated to 14,000 randomly selected CARP members.
RESULTS: In the incentive group, 305 (53.0%) clicked on the hyperlink and visited the website and 84 (14.6%) completed the survey. In the group who received no incentive, 280 (48.7%) clicked on the link and 59 (10.3%) completed the survey. Of those who received the online newsletter, 492 (3.5%) visited the website and 106 (0.76%) completed the survey.
CONCLUSION: A relatively modest financial incentive in the form of a cash lottery significantly increased participation rates in an online health survey. Recruitment through a newsletter advertisement had a very low yield compared to direct e-mail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20737820      PMCID: PMC6973917     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Public Health        ISSN: 0008-4263


  9 in total

1.  The effects of lottery incentive and length of questionnaire on health survey response rates: a randomized study.

Authors:  J S Kalantar; N J Talley
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  The effect on response rates of offering a small incentive with a mailed questionnaire.

Authors:  L D Marrett; N Kreiger; L Dodds; S Hilditch
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  A randomized trial of incentives to improve response rates to a mailed women's health questionnaire.

Authors:  Maura K Whiteman; Patricia Langenberg; Kristen Kjerulff; Robert McCarter; Jodi Anne Flaws
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Electronic mail was not better than postal mail for surveying residents and faculty.

Authors:  Elie A Akl; Nancy Maroun; Robert A Klocke; Victor Montori; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Recruiting survey respondents to mailed surveys: controlled trials of incentives and prompts.

Authors:  V M Spry; M F Hovell; J G Sallis; C R Hofsteter; J P Elder; C A Molgaard
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Comparison of responses to a US 2 dollar bill versus a chance to win 250 US dollars in a mail survey of emergency physicians.

Authors:  Joshua H Tamayo-Sarver; David W Baker
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  Challenges of internet recruitment: a case study with disappointing results.

Authors:  Malcolm Koo; Harvey Skinner
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2005-03-19       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  A randomised controlled trial to determine the effect on response of including a lottery incentive in health surveys [ISRCTN32203485].

Authors:  L M Roberts; S Wilson; A Roalfe; P Bridge
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  The interdisciplinary eHealth team: chronic care for the future.

Authors:  John Wiecha; Timothy Pollard
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2004-09-03       Impact factor: 5.428

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Population Survey Features and Response Rates: A Randomized Experiment.

Authors:  Yimeng Guo; Jacek A Kopec; Jolanda Cibere; Linda C Li; Charles H Goldsmith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Is lifelong knee joint force from work, home, and sport related to knee osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Charles R Ratzlaff; Mieke Koehoorn; Jolanda Cibere; Jacek A Kopec
Journal:  Int J Rheumatol       Date:  2012-07-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.