Literature DB >> 1342326

The effect on response rates of offering a small incentive with a mailed questionnaire.

L D Marrett1, N Kreiger, L Dodds, S Hilditch.   

Abstract

To determine whether response rates to a mailed questionnaire sent to population control subjects could be increased through offer of a small incentive, half of the control subjects (n = 477) in a case-control study of renal cell carcinoma were randomly selected to receive a contact letter offering a lottery ticket if a completed questionnaire was returned; the remaining subjects (n = 477) received the same letter but with no mention of a lottery ticket. Overall response rates did not differ between the two groups (72.6% versus 74.4%), although a higher percentage of those offered a lottery ticket responded without follow-up (24.4% versus 18.5%). Binomial regression modeling of the effect of the lottery ticket offer, sex, age, and percent of urban dwellers on response indicated a significant effect only for percent of urban dwellers, the rate of response increasing with a decreasing percentage of urban dwellers. The effect of sex was of borderline significance (P = 0.05), with females having the higher rate of response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1342326     DOI: 10.1016/1047-2797(92)90019-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  9 in total

1.  The effect of cash lottery on response rates to an online health survey among members of the Canadian Association of Retired Persons: a randomized experiment.

Authors:  Paul Doerfling; Jacek A Kopec; Matthew H Liang; John M Esdaile
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2010 May-Jun

2.  Can incentives undermine intrinsic motivation to participate in epidemiologic surveys?

Authors:  Marika Wenemark; Asa Vernby; Annika Lindahl Norberg
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Risk factors for renal cell carcinoma: results of a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  N Kreiger; L D Marrett; L Dodds; S Hilditch; G A Darlington
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): methods and 1996 response rates from 11 states.

Authors:  B C Gilbert; H B Shulman; L A Fischer; M M Rogers
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1999-12

5.  Recruiting elderly African-American women in cancer prevention and control studies: a multifaceted approach and its effectiveness.

Authors:  K Zhu; S Hunter; L J Bernard; K Payne-Wilks; C L Roland; R S Levine
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Case-control study of bladder cancer and chlorination by-products in treated water (Ontario, Canada).

Authors:  W D King; L D Marrett
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Scratch lottery tickets are a poor incentive to respond to mailed questionnaires.

Authors:  Vilhjalmur Finsen; Andreas H Storeheier
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  A randomised controlled trial to determine the effect on response of including a lottery incentive in health surveys [ISRCTN32203485].

Authors:  L M Roberts; S Wilson; A Roalfe; P Bridge
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.