Literature DB >> 2741903

Recruiting survey respondents to mailed surveys: controlled trials of incentives and prompts.

V M Spry1, M F Hovell, J G Sallis, C R Hofsteter, J P Elder, C A Molgaard.   

Abstract

Three controlled experiments tested the efficacy of 1) a postcard or telephone prompt, 2) a lottery, 3) monetary incentives, and 4) questionnaire length to recruit adult survey respondents to a random sample of residences in San Diego, California, during 1986-1988. In experiment 1, the group randomly assigned to receive a telephone call prenotification plus the lottery incentive responded 26-66% more frequently than did controls (p = 0.02) after a single mailing. The postcard plus lottery was 17-54% more effective than no intervention with controls (p = 0.05). A second mailing of the survey weakened these effects. In experiment 2, the group randomly assigned to receive a two-page survey with the lottery announcement responded 69% more frequently after one mailing (p = 0.03) and 53% more frequently after a second mailing (p = 0.04) than the group that received an eight-page survey without the lottery incentive. The shorter form alone or the lottery alone did not increase response rates significantly relative to the long form without a lottery. In experiment 3, a monetary incentive of $5.00 contingent on response to the second mailing of the survey increased the rate of response from initial "nonresponders" by 100% relative to control who received no incentive (p = 0.03) and 75% over those who received $1.00 not contingent on response (p = 0.04). Little sampling bias and no reactivity was attributable to the recruitment procedures.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2741903     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  15 in total

1.  Health and school performance of teenagers born before 29 weeks gestation.

Authors:  A Johnson; U Bowler; P Yudkin; C Hockley; U Wariyar; F Gardner; L Mutch
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Factors influencing the effectiveness of mailed health surveys.

Authors:  G H Gilbert; J Longmate; L G Branch
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Using pamphlets with mail surveys to improve response.

Authors:  L A Shaker; K Derycke-Chapman; L M Brass
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The effect of cash lottery on response rates to an online health survey among members of the Canadian Association of Retired Persons: a randomized experiment.

Authors:  Paul Doerfling; Jacek A Kopec; Matthew H Liang; John M Esdaile
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2010 May-Jun

5.  Intensive follow-up of control subjects: is it necessary?

Authors:  B W Alderman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Evaluation of the use of general practice age-sex registers in epidemiological research.

Authors:  K Walsh
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): methods and 1996 response rates from 11 states.

Authors:  B C Gilbert; H B Shulman; L A Fischer; M M Rogers
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1999-12

8.  An experimental test of the effect of incentives on recruitment of ethnically diverse colorectal cancer cases and their first-degree relatives into a research study.

Authors:  Annette E Maxwell; Roshan Bastani; Beth A Glenn; Cynthia M Mojica; L Cindy Chang
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Use of health services before the diagnosis of melanoma: implications for early detection and screening.

Authors:  A C Geller; H K Koh; D R Miller; R W Clapp; M B Mercer; R A Lew
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.