Literature DB >> 20735182

Clinical efficacy of fat-graft myringoplasty for perforations of different sizes and locations.

Dong-Kee Kim1, Shi-Nae Park, Sang Won Yeo, Eun Hye Kim, Ji-Eun Kim, Boo-Young Kim, Min-Ji Kim, Kyoung-Ho Park.   

Abstract

CONCLUSION: Fat-graft myringoplasty (FGM) has a reliable tympanic closure rate for small to large perforations, but yields poor hearing improvement in the latter case. A topographic evaluation of FGM showed that the procedure resulted in a reliable perforation closure rate and audiologic outcome, regardless of perforation location.
OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the utility of FGM in treating perforations of different sizes and locations.
METHODS: This retrospective study involved 45 patients (46 ears) who underwent FGM at St Mary's Hospital (Seoul, Korea) between August 2007 and February 2010.
RESULTS: The total perforation closure rate after FGM was 87% (40 cases), with no statistical difference among perforation size groups, even though the mean closure rates of the 10-20% and >30% perforation groups were lower than other groups. The difference in the closure rates of patients with anteriorly located perforations and those with perforations in other sites was not significant. The mean postoperative air-bone gap (ABG) was 14.3 (±7.5) dB. Mean postoperative ABG improved significantly after FGM; however, on a per-group basis, the >30% perforation group had the poorest results and the difference was statistically significant. The difference in mean postoperative ABGs of the two groups depending on the location of the perforation (anterior and other) was not significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20735182     DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2010.499881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  9 in total

1.  Factors affecting the treatment outcomes of myringoplasty in patients with small tympanic membrane perforations.

Authors:  Shih-Lung Chen; Shih-Wei Yang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Reply to the letter to the editor concerning: 'Fat-plug myringoplasty of ear lobule vs abdominal donor sites'.

Authors:  Mustafa Acar; Demet Yazıcı; Turhan San; Nuray Bayar Muluk; Cemal Cingi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Fat volume is critical when performing fat-plug myringoplasty.

Authors:  Zhong-Hai Jin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Myringoplasty Quality Control Is Necessary: Comparison of Surgical Results of Two Consecutive Series in A Single Institution.

Authors:  Matti Iso-Mustajärvi; Aarno Dietz; Heikki Löppönen
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.017

5.  The Long-Term Stability of Fat-Graft Myringoplasty in the Closure of Tympanic Membrane Perforations and Hearing Restoration.

Authors:  Jae Sang Han; Jung Ju Han; Jung Mee Park; Jae-Hyun Seo; Kyoung Ho Park
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.538

6.  Transtympanic soft tissue tympanoplasty can replace conventional techniques elevating tympanic membranes.

Authors:  Jungho Ha; Hantai Kim; Jeong Hun Jang; Hun Yi Park; Yun-Hoon Choung
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Middle Ear Packing and External Ear Packing With Fibrin Glue Enhance the Success of Fat Myringoplasty Without Hyaluronic Acid Disc.

Authors:  Jongmin Kim; Hyung-Joo Park; Dae-Neung Lee; Chul Ho Jang
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Fat-plug myringoplasty of ear lobule vs abdominal donor sites.

Authors:  Mustafa Acar; Demet Yazıcı; Turhan San; Nuray Bayar Muluk; Cemal Cingi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Prevalence of Perforated Graft in Underlay and Pop-in Technique Myringoplasty.

Authors:  Bhuwan Raj Pandey; Poonam Kc
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.406

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.