Literature DB >> 29764787

Myringoplasty Quality Control Is Necessary: Comparison of Surgical Results of Two Consecutive Series in A Single Institution.

Matti Iso-Mustajärvi1, Aarno Dietz1, Heikki Löppönen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare myringoplasty results from two different consecutive series conducted at the Kuopio University Hospital during a four-decade period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 315 patients (a total of 338 ears) who underwent myringoplasty at Kuopio University Hospital between the years 1986 and 2012. The results from this series were compared with those form a previously published series of 404 patients who underwent myringoplasty between 1970 and 1985 at the same institution.
RESULTS: Myringoplasty was considered to be successful whenever the tympanic membrane remained closed without atelectasis. The results were analyzed at the 1- and 3-year follow-up. The overall success rate after 1 year was 82.8% compared with 88% in the previous series. The success rate after 3 years was 87.4%. The best closure rate after 1 year (85.7%) was achieved with fascia grafts (n=272) and perichondrium (85.7%, n=14). The closure rate of 61.9% with the perichondrium/cartilage graft (n=21) and 71.0% with the fat graft (n=31) was statistically significantly lower (p < 0.05) compared with that with the fascia graft. The postoperative air-bone gap (0.5-4 kHz) was < 10 dB(HL) in 56.2% and < 20 dB(HL) in 79.6% cases compared with 61% and 87%, respectively, in previous series.
CONCLUSION: Myringoplasty is a safe procedure with a reasonably high success rate. We observed a slight deterioration in the overall results compared with the previous series. This study highlights the importance of systematic quality control and the results and the need for follow-up of the learning curve after the introduction of new surgical techniques and materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29764787      PMCID: PMC6354501          DOI: 10.5152/iao.2018.4276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Adv Otol        ISSN: 1308-7649            Impact factor:   1.017


  26 in total

1.  Myringoplasty: a prospective audit study.

Authors:  B Kotecha; S Fowler; J Topham
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1999-04

2.  Clinical efficacy of fat-graft myringoplasty for perforations of different sizes and locations.

Authors:  Dong-Kee Kim; Shi-Nae Park; Sang Won Yeo; Eun Hye Kim; Ji-Eun Kim; Boo-Young Kim; Min-Ji Kim; Kyoung-Ho Park
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 1.494

3.  Fat graft myringoplasty: a cost-effective but underused procedure.

Authors:  O B Ozgursoy; I Yorulmaz
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.469

4.  [Myringoplasty: auditory follow-up and study of prognostic factors].

Authors:  Francisco J Avilés Jurado; Jorge L Merán Gil; Marc Tobed Secall; Esther Doménech Vadillo; Elisabeth Masgoret Palau; M Dolores Martínez Novoa; Enric Figuerola Massana
Journal:  Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp       Date:  2009 May-Jun

5.  Adipose graft: an original option in myringoplasty.

Authors:  S Ayache; F Braccini; F Facon; J M Thomassin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  A multivariate analysis of otological, surgical and patient-related factors in determining success in myringoplasty.

Authors:  K Onal; M Z Uguz; K C Kazikdas; S T Gursoy; H Gokce
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.597

7.  Myringoplasty: does the size of the perforation matter?

Authors:  P Lee; G Kelly; R P Mills
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2002-10

8.  Bilateral myringoplasty in chronic otitis media.

Authors:  Per Caye-Thomasen; Torfinnur Rubek Nielsen; Mirko Tos
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Pediatric myringoplasty: postaural versus transmeatal approach.

Authors:  Angela Halim; Johannes Borgstein
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-06       Impact factor: 1.675

10.  Hyaluronic acid fat graft myringoplasty: how we do it.

Authors:  I Saliba
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.597

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.