PURPOSE: To measure the accuracy of TonoLab (TioLat, Helsinki, Finland) tonometry in mice with spontaneous or induced experimental glaucoma. METHODS: Chronic intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation was induced in one eye of 32 mice by injection of polystyrene beads and viscoelastic material. Three to 6 weeks later, the eyes were cannulated and manometrically set to 10, 20, 30, 40, or 50 mm Hg. The mice were 8-week and 8-month-old C57BL/6, 8-week-old DBA/2J, and 8-week-old CD1. The TonoLab calibration was also tested on five aged DBA/2J mice with spontaneous glaucoma. The relation of the TonoLab reading to manometric IOP was evaluated in multivariate linear regression models with axial length, IOP history, and mouse strain as independent variables. RESULTS: The slope of the relationship between TonoLab and manometric IOP in all the mice was 0.998, with an intercept of 2.3 mm Hg (adjusted R in univariate regression = 0.86). Neither the mice with bead-induced glaucoma nor those with spontaneous glaucoma (older DBA/2J mice) differed significantly from the control animals in having an excellent correlation between TonoLab and manometer IOP. Longer and wider mouse eyes had slightly higher tonometrically measured IOP, whether glaucomatous or control (multivariate regression, adjusted R(2) = 0.90, P < 0.0001). There was no difference in tonometric accuracy among the three mouse strains: CD1, C57BL/6, and DBA/2J, nor between 8-week and 8-month-old C57BL/6 mice (multivariate regression, P = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: The TonoLab accurately reflects IOP in both normal mice and in eyes of mice with experimental or spontaneous glaucoma, with no detectable effect of age.
PURPOSE: To measure the accuracy of TonoLab (TioLat, Helsinki, Finland) tonometry in mice with spontaneous or induced experimental glaucoma. METHODS: Chronic intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation was induced in one eye of 32 mice by injection of polystyrene beads and viscoelastic material. Three to 6 weeks later, the eyes were cannulated and manometrically set to 10, 20, 30, 40, or 50 mm Hg. The mice were 8-week and 8-month-old C57BL/6, 8-week-old DBA/2J, and 8-week-old CD1. The TonoLab calibration was also tested on five aged DBA/2J mice with spontaneous glaucoma. The relation of the TonoLab reading to manometric IOP was evaluated in multivariate linear regression models with axial length, IOP history, and mouse strain as independent variables. RESULTS: The slope of the relationship between TonoLab and manometric IOP in all the mice was 0.998, with an intercept of 2.3 mm Hg (adjusted R in univariate regression = 0.86). Neither the mice with bead-induced glaucoma nor those with spontaneous glaucoma (older DBA/2J mice) differed significantly from the control animals in having an excellent correlation between TonoLab and manometer IOP. Longer and wider mouse eyes had slightly higher tonometrically measured IOP, whether glaucomatous or control (multivariate regression, adjusted R(2) = 0.90, P < 0.0001). There was no difference in tonometric accuracy among the three mouse strains: CD1, C57BL/6, and DBA/2J, nor between 8-week and 8-month-old C57BL/6 mice (multivariate regression, P = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: The TonoLab accurately reflects IOP in both normal mice and in eyes of mice with experimental or spontaneous glaucoma, with no detectable effect of age.
Authors: Wan-Heng Wang; J Cameron Millar; Iok-Hou Pang; Martin B Wax; Abbot F Clark Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Marcel Y Avila; Alejandro Múnera; Arcadio Guzmán; Chi Wai Do; Zhao Wang; Richard A Stone; Mortimer M Civan Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Sinisa D Grozdanic; Daniel M Betts; Donald S Sakaguchi; Rachell A Allbaugh; Young H Kwon; Randy H Kardon Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Herbert A Reitsamer; Jeffrey W Kiel; Joseph M Harrison; Nancy L Ransom; Stuart J McKinnon Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Harry A Quigley; Frances E Cone; Scott E Gelman; Zhiyong Yang; Janice L Son; Ericka N Oglesby; Mary E Pease; Donald J Zack Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2011-01-25 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Xiaofeng Tao; Jasdeep Sabharwal; Robert L Seilheimer; Samuel M Wu; Benjamin J Frankfort Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2019-01-08 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Benjamin J Frankfort; A Kareem Khan; Dennis Y Tse; Inyoung Chung; Ji-Jie Pang; Zhuo Yang; Ronald L Gross; Samuel M Wu Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-01-28 Impact factor: 4.799