PURPOSE: Intraocular pressure (IOP) varies between genetically distinct strains of mice. The purpose was to test the hypothesis that strain-dependent differences in IOP are attributable to differences in conventional outflow facility (C). METHODS: The IOP was measured by rebound tonometry in conscious or anesthetized BALB/cJ, C57BL/6J, and CBA/J mice (N = 6-10 per strain). Conventional outflow facility was measured by ex vivo perfusion of enucleated eyes (N = 9-10 per strain). RESULTS: Conscious IOP varied between strains, being highest in CBA/J (14.5 ± 0.9 mm Hg, mean ± SD), intermediate in C57BL/6J (12.3 ± 1.0 mm Hg), and lowest in BALB/cJ (10.6 ± 1.8 mm Hg) mice. Anesthesia reduced IOP and eliminated any detectable differences between strains. Conventional outflow facility also varied between strains, but, in contrast to IOP, C was lowest in CBA/J (0.0113 ± 0.0031 μL/min/mm Hg) and highest in BALB/cJ (0.0164 ± 0.0059 μL/min/mm Hg). Like IOP, C was intermediate in C57BL/6J (0.0147 ± 0.0029 μL/min/mm Hg). There was a strong correlation between conscious IOP and outflow resistance (1/C) from individual eyes across all three strains, revealing that 70% of the variation in IOP was attributable to variation in outflow resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in IOP among three genetically distinct murine strains are attributable largely to differences in conventional outflow facility. These results motivate further studies using mice to identify the morphologic and genetic factors that underlie IOP regulation within the conventional outflow pathway.
PURPOSE: Intraocular pressure (IOP) varies between genetically distinct strains of mice. The purpose was to test the hypothesis that strain-dependent differences in IOP are attributable to differences in conventional outflow facility (C). METHODS: The IOP was measured by rebound tonometry in conscious or anesthetized BALB/cJ, C57BL/6J, and CBA/J mice (N = 6-10 per strain). Conventional outflow facility was measured by ex vivo perfusion of enucleated eyes (N = 9-10 per strain). RESULTS: Conscious IOP varied between strains, being highest in CBA/J (14.5 ± 0.9 mm Hg, mean ± SD), intermediate in C57BL/6J (12.3 ± 1.0 mm Hg), and lowest in BALB/cJ (10.6 ± 1.8 mm Hg) mice. Anesthesia reduced IOP and eliminated any detectable differences between strains. Conventional outflow facility also varied between strains, but, in contrast to IOP, C was lowest in CBA/J (0.0113 ± 0.0031 μL/min/mm Hg) and highest in BALB/cJ (0.0164 ± 0.0059 μL/min/mm Hg). Like IOP, C was intermediate in C57BL/6J (0.0147 ± 0.0029 μL/min/mm Hg). There was a strong correlation between conscious IOP and outflow resistance (1/C) from individual eyes across all three strains, revealing that 70% of the variation in IOP was attributable to variation in outflow resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in IOP among three genetically distinct murine strains are attributable largely to differences in conventional outflow facility. These results motivate further studies using mice to identify the morphologic and genetic factors that underlie IOP regulation within the conventional outflow pathway.
Authors: C L Karp; A Grupe; E Schadt; S L Ewart; M Keane-Moore; P J Cuomo; J Köhl; L Wahl; D Kuperman; S Germer; D Aud; G Peltz; M Wills-Karp Journal: Nat Immunol Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 25.606
Authors: Johannes Gottanka; Darren Chan; Michael Eichhorn; Elke Lütjen-Drecoll; C Ross Ethier Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jason Y H Chang; W Daniel Stamer; Jacques Bertrand; A Thomas Read; Catherine M Marando; C Ross Ethier; Darryl R Overby Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 4.249
Authors: Darryl R Overby; Jacques Bertrand; Ozan-Yüksel Tektas; Alexandra Boussommier-Calleja; Martin Schicht; C Ross Ethier; David F Woodward; W Daniel Stamer; Elke Lütjen-Drecoll Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Kayla R Ficarrotta; Simon A Bello; Youssef H Mohamed; Christopher L Passaglia Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Alexandra Boussommier-Calleja; Guorong Li; Amanda Wilson; Tal Ziskind; Oana Elena Scinteie; Nicole E Ashpole; Joseph M Sherwood; Sina Farsiu; Pratap Challa; Pedro Gonzalez; J Crawford Downs; C Ross Ethier; W Daniel Stamer; Darryl R Overby Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Ester Reina-Torres; Jacques A Bertrand; Jeffrey O'Callaghan; Joseph M Sherwood; Peter Humphries; Darryl R Overby Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2019-07-24 Impact factor: 3.467