PURPOSE: To establish an experimental model of ocular hypertension in the mouse. METHODS: Twenty-two black Swiss mice were used. After anesthesia and pupil dilation, the anterior chamber was flattened by the aspiration of aqueous humor. Laser photocoagulation (532-nm wavelength, 200-mW power, 0.05-second duration, 200- micro m spot size) then was performed at the limbus. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured weekly for 4 weeks and biweekly for 12 weeks, by a microneedle method. Slit lamp biomicroscopy was performed throughout the period and the structural changes were assessed histologically. A treatment response was considered to be a success if either the mean of IOP measurements collected during the first 4 weeks was increased by 30% or more, or the mean of all measurements collected during the 12 week study period was increased by 30% or more. RESULTS: Laser-treated eyes showed significantly higher IOP than control eyes from 1 to 6 weeks (P < 0.001). The average IOP in treated eyes during the first 4 and 12 weeks was significantly higher than the control IOP (P < 0.001). These IOP increases were 7.1 and 3.8 mm Hg, respectively. During the first 4 weeks, sustained elevation of IOP was obtained in 64% (14/22) of the treated eyes. During the entire 12-week study, increased IOP was successfully maintained in 37% (7/19) of the treated eyes. After 6 weeks, elevated IOP often returned to normal or several mm Hg below normal. Histologic analysis at the end of the 12-week study showed no inflammatory cells in the anterior segment and confirmed that the angle was closed by the laser photocoagulation treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This method produces persistent IOP elevation in mouse eyes and may be a promising experimental model for the investigation of the biological mechanisms of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
PURPOSE: To establish an experimental model of ocular hypertension in the mouse. METHODS: Twenty-two black Swiss mice were used. After anesthesia and pupil dilation, the anterior chamber was flattened by the aspiration of aqueous humor. Laser photocoagulation (532-nm wavelength, 200-mW power, 0.05-second duration, 200- micro m spot size) then was performed at the limbus. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured weekly for 4 weeks and biweekly for 12 weeks, by a microneedle method. Slit lamp biomicroscopy was performed throughout the period and the structural changes were assessed histologically. A treatment response was considered to be a success if either the mean of IOP measurements collected during the first 4 weeks was increased by 30% or more, or the mean of all measurements collected during the 12 week study period was increased by 30% or more. RESULTS: Laser-treated eyes showed significantly higher IOP than control eyes from 1 to 6 weeks (P < 0.001). The average IOP in treated eyes during the first 4 and 12 weeks was significantly higher than the control IOP (P < 0.001). These IOP increases were 7.1 and 3.8 mm Hg, respectively. During the first 4 weeks, sustained elevation of IOP was obtained in 64% (14/22) of the treated eyes. During the entire 12-week study, increased IOP was successfully maintained in 37% (7/19) of the treated eyes. After 6 weeks, elevated IOP often returned to normal or several mm Hg below normal. Histologic analysis at the end of the 12-week study showed no inflammatory cells in the anterior segment and confirmed that the angle was closed by the laser photocoagulation treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This method produces persistent IOP elevation in mouse eyes and may be a promising experimental model for the investigation of the biological mechanisms of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
Authors: Mary E Pease; Frances E Cone; Scott Gelman; Janice L Son; Harry A Quigley Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-02-22 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Hui Chen; Yan Zhao; Mingna Liu; Liang Feng; Zhen Puyang; Ji Yi; Peiji Liang; Hao F Zhang; Jianhua Cang; John B Troy; Xiaorong Liu Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Rebecca M Sappington; Brian J Carlson; Samuel D Crish; David J Calkins Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-10-22 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Kevin C Chan; Yu Yu; Shuk Han Ng; Heather K Mak; Yolanda W Y Yip; Yolandi van der Merwe; Tianmin Ren; Jasmine S Y Yung; Sayantan Biswas; Xu Cao; Ying Chau; Christopher K S Leung Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Liang Feng; Yan Zhao; Miho Yoshida; Hui Chen; Jessica F Yang; Ted S Kim; Jianhua Cang; John B Troy; Xiaorong Liu Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Benjamin J Frankfort; A Kareem Khan; Dennis Y Tse; Inyoung Chung; Ji-Jie Pang; Zhuo Yang; Ronald L Gross; Samuel M Wu Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-01-28 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Manuel Salinas-Navarro; Luis Alarcón-Martínez; Francisco Javier Valiente-Soriano; Arturo Ortín-Martínez; Manuel Jiménez-López; Marcelino Avilés-Trigueros; María Paz Villegas-Pérez; Pedro de la Villa; Manuel Vidal-Sanz Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2009-12-05 Impact factor: 2.367