Literature DB >> 20719342

Profile of the brushite stone former.

Amy E Krambeck1, Shelly E Handa, Andrew P Evan, James E Lingeman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The incidence of brushite stones has increased during the last 3 decades and we report our experience with brushite stone formers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1996 to 2008 we identified 82 patients with brushite urinary calculi. After institutional review board approval a review of our prospectively collected database was performed.
RESULTS: There were 54 (65.9%) male and 28 (34.1%) female stone formers. Mean age was 44 years (range 4 to 84). Prior stone events were reported by 69 (84.1%) patients with 54 (78.3%) having received shock wave lithotripsy. Bilateral calculi were present in 28 (34.1%) patients. Mean stone area was 29.2 mm(2) (range 2 to 130). Surgery was performed in 80 patients including 63 (76.8%) percutaneous nephrolithotomy, 8 (9.8%) ureteroscopy, 3 (3.7%) shock wave lithotripsy, and 6 (7.3%) ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. After primary and secondary procedures 76 (92.7%) patients were rendered stone-free. Metabolic urine studies were available in 45 patients. All patients demonstrated 1 or more abnormalities, with hypercalciuria (greater than 250 mg daily for women and greater than 275 mg daily for men) in 38 (80.9%), urine pH greater than 6.2 in 29 (61.7%), urine volume less than 2 l in 27 (57.4%), hypocitraturia (less than 320 mg daily) in 22 (46.8%), hyperuricosuria (greater than 750 mg daily in women, greater than 800 mg daily in men) in 8 (17%) and hyperoxaluria (greater than 32 mg daily in women and greater than 43 mg daily in men) in 5 (10.6%). Recurrent stone events occurred in 31 (37.8%) patients at a mean of 33 (range 2 to 118) months from treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Brushite stone formers are a treatment challenge. Almost a third will present with bilateral stones and the stone burden is sizeable. Nearly 80% of patients report having prior shock wave lithotripsy and recurrent stone events occurred approximately 3 years after treatment. All patients with brushite stones in this cohort had an underlying metabolic abnormality and specifically brushite stones should be heralded as a marker for hypercalciuria. Based on these data we recommend all brushite stone formers undergo 24-hour urine studies and have close long-term followup.
Copyright © 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20719342      PMCID: PMC3173741          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.05.094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  20 in total

1.  Synthetic hydroxyapatite crystals. 1. Sodium and potassium fixation.

Authors:  W F NEMAN; T Y TORIBARA; B J MULRYAN
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1962-09       Impact factor: 4.013

2.  Urinary tract stone disease in the United States veteran population. II. Geographical analysis of variations in composition.

Authors:  N S Mandel; G S Mandel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994.

Authors:  Kiriaki K Stamatelou; Mildred E Francis; Camille A Jones; Leroy M Nyberg; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Spontaneous precipitation of brushite in urine: evidence that brushite is the nidus of renal stones originating as calcium phosphate.

Authors:  C Y Pak; E D Eanes; B Ruskin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Idiopathic calcium phosphate nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  M H Gault; P S Parfrey; W G Robertson
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.847

6.  The clinical implications of brushite calculi.

Authors:  L W Klee; C G Brito; J E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Body size and risk of kidney stones.

Authors:  G C Curhan; W C Willett; E B Rimm; F E Speizer; M J Stampfer
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 10.121

8.  Urine pH in renal calcium stone formers who do and do not increase stone phosphate content with time.

Authors:  Joan H Parks; Fredric L Coe; Andrew P Evan; Elaine M Worcester
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 5.992

9.  Clinical implications of abundant calcium phosphate in routinely analyzed kidney stones.

Authors:  Joan H Parks; Elaine M Worcester; Fredric L Coe; Andrew P Evan; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  Predictive value of kidney stone composition in the detection of metabolic abnormalities.

Authors:  Charles Y C Pak; John R Poindexter; Beverley Adams-Huet; Margaret S Pearle
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Brushite stone disease as a consequence of lithotripsy?

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; Shelly E Handa; Andrew P Evan; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-07-10

2.  Fragility of brushite stones in shock wave lithotripsy: absence of correlation with computerized tomography visible structure.

Authors:  James C Williams; Tariq Hameed; Molly E Jackson; Syed Aftab; Alessia Gambaro; Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James E Lingeman; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Papillary Ductal Plugging is a Mechanism for Early Stone Retention in Brushite Stone Disease.

Authors:  James C Williams; Michael S Borofsky; Sharon B Bledsoe; Andrew P Evan; Fredric L Coe; Elaine M Worcester; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Development of a prospective data registry system for retrograde intrarenal surgery in renal stones: Turkish Academy of Urology Prospective Study Group (ACUP study).

Authors:  Murat Akand; Kemal Sarıca; Murat Can Kiremit; Mustafa Soytaş; Selçuk Güven
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-11-14

5.  Nephrocalcinosis in Calcium Stone Formers Who Do Not have Systemic Disease.

Authors:  Naeem Bhojani; Jessica E Paonessa; Tariq A Hameed; Elaine M Worcester; Andrew P Evan; Fredric L Coe; Michael S Borofsky; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Chronic kidney disease in kidney stone formers.

Authors:  Andrew D Rule; Amy E Krambeck; John C Lieske
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Impact of Potassium Citrate vs Citric Acid on Urinary Stone Risk in Calcium Phosphate Stone Formers.

Authors:  Steeve Doizi; John R Poindexter; Margaret S Pearle; Francisco Blanco; Orson W Moe; Khashayar Sakhaee; Naim M Maalouf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Rationale and Design of the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter (ReSKU): A Prospective Observational Registry to Study the Natural History of Urolithiasis Patients.

Authors:  Helena C Chang; David T Tzou; Manint Usawachintachit; Brian D Duty; Ryan S Hsi; Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Marshall L Stoller; Roger L Sur; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Interpreting the results of chemical stone analysis in the era of modern stone analysis techniques.

Authors:  Ron Gilad; James C Williams; Kalba D Usman; Ronen Holland; Shay Golan; Ruth Tor; David Lifshitz
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.902

10.  The influence of maternal and paternal history on stone composition and clinical course of calcium nephrolithiasis in subjects aged between 15 and 25.

Authors:  Angela Guerra; Andrea Ticinesi; Franca Allegri; Antonio Nouvenne; Silvana Pinelli; Giuseppina Folesani; Fulvio Lauretani; Marcello Maggio; Loris Borghi; Tiziana Meschi
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.