Literature DB >> 27758162

Rationale and Design of the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter (ReSKU): A Prospective Observational Registry to Study the Natural History of Urolithiasis Patients.

Helena C Chang1, David T Tzou1, Manint Usawachintachit1,2, Brian D Duty3, Ryan S Hsi1, Jonathan D Harper4, Mathew D Sorensen4, Marshall L Stoller1, Roger L Sur5, Thomas Chi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Registry-based clinical research in nephrolithiasis is critical to advancing quality in urinary stone disease management and ultimately reducing stone recurrence. A need exists to develop Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant registries that comprise integrated electronic health record (EHR) data using prospectively defined variables. An EHR-based standardized patient database-the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter (ReSKU™)-was developed, and herein we describe our implementation outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Interviews with academic and community endourologists in the United States, Canada, China, and Japan identified demographic, intraoperative, and perioperative variables to populate our registry. Variables were incorporated into a HIPAA-compliant Research Electronic Data Capture database linked to text prompts and registration data within the Epic EHR platform. Specific data collection instruments supporting New patient, Surgery, Postoperative, and Follow-up clinical encounters were created within Epic to facilitate automated data extraction into ReSKU.
RESULTS: The number of variables within each instrument includes the following: New patient-60, Surgery-80, Postoperative-64, and Follow-up-64. With manual data entry, the mean times to complete each of the clinic-based instruments were (minutes) as follows: New patient-12.06 ± 2.30, Postoperative-7.18 ± 1.02, and Follow-up-8.10 ± 0.58. These times were significantly reduced with the use of ReSKU structured clinic note templates to the following: New patient-4.09 ± 1.73, Postoperative-1.41 ± 0.41, and Follow-up-0.79 ± 0.38. With automated data extraction from Epic, manual entry is obviated.
CONCLUSIONS: ReSKU is a longitudinal prospective nephrolithiasis registry that integrates EHR data, lowering the barriers to performing high quality clinical research and quality outcome assessments in urinary stone disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  prospective studies; registries; urolithiasis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27758162      PMCID: PMC5144847          DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  15 in total

1.  Why observational studies should be among the tools used in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Nancy A Dreyer; Sean R Tunis; Marc Berger; Dan Ollendorf; Pattra Mattox; Richard Gliklich
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 2.  EAU Guidelines on Diagnosis and Conservative Management of Urolithiasis.

Authors:  Christian Türk; Aleš Petřík; Kemal Sarica; Christian Seitz; Andreas Skolarikos; Michael Straub; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Clinical research subject recruitment: the Volunteer for Vanderbilt Research Program www.volunteer.mc.vanderbilt.edu.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Lynda Lane; Italo Biaggioni
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  Renal replacement therapy registries--time for a structured data quality evaluation programme.

Authors:  Cécile Couchoud; Mathilde Lassalle; Ronald Cornet; Kitty J Jager
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  Profile of the brushite stone former.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; Shelly E Handa; Andrew P Evan; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Hereditary causes of kidney stones and chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Vidar O Edvardsson; David S Goldfarb; John C Lieske; Lada Beara-Lasic; Franca Anglani; Dawn S Milliner; Runolfur Palsson
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 8.  EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis.

Authors:  Christian Türk; Aleš Petřík; Kemal Sarica; Christian Seitz; Andreas Skolarikos; Michael Straub; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Evidence for durable kidney stone prevention over several decades.

Authors:  Joan H Parks; Fredric L Coe
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Acceptability and perceived barriers and facilitators to creating a national research register to enable 'direct to patient' enrolment into research: the Scottish Health Research Register (SHARE).

Authors:  Aileen Grant; Jenny Ure; Donald J Nicolson; Janet Hanley; Aziz Sheikh; Brian McKinstry; Frank Sullivan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  10 in total

1.  Optimizing RNA Extraction of Renal Papilla Biopsy Tissue in Kidney Stone Formers: A New Methodology for Genomic Study.

Authors:  Kazumi Taguchi; Manint Usawachintachit; Shuzo Hamamoto; Rei Unno; David T Tzou; Benjamin A Sherer; Yongmei Wang; Atsushi Okada; Marshall L Stoller; Takahiro Yasui; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Clinical Outcomes for Cystinuria Patients with Unilateral Versus Bilateral Cystine Stone Disease.

Authors:  Manint Usawachintachit; Benjamin Sherer; Matthew Hudnall; David T Tzou; Kazumi Taguchi; Ryan S Hsi; Marshall Stoller; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Development of a prospective data registry system for retrograde intrarenal surgery in renal stones: Turkish Academy of Urology Prospective Study Group (ACUP study).

Authors:  Murat Akand; Kemal Sarıca; Murat Can Kiremit; Mustafa Soytaş; Selçuk Güven
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-11-14

4.  A Prospective Case-Control Study Comparing LithoVue, a Single-Use, Flexible Disposable Ureteroscope, with Flexible, Reusable Fiber-Optic Ureteroscopes.

Authors:  Manint Usawachintachit; Dylan S Isaacson; Kazumi Taguchi; David T Tzou; Ryan S Hsi; Benjamin A Sherer; Marshall L Stoller; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Computed Tomography Radiation Exposure Among Referred Kidney Stone Patients: Results from the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter.

Authors:  David T Tzou; Samuel Zetumer; Manint Usawachintachit; Kazumi Taguchi; Seth K Bechis; Brian D Duty; Jonathan D Harper; Ryan S Hsi; Mathew Sorensen; Roger L Sur; Shalonda Reliford-Titus; Helena C Chang; Dylan Isaacson; David B Bayne; Zhen J Wang; Marshall L Stoller; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  The Impact of Stone Multiplicity on Surgical Decisions for Patients with Large Stone Burden: Results from ReSKU.

Authors:  Samuel Zetumer; Scott Wiener; David B Bayne; Manuel Armas-Phan; Samuel L Washington; David T Tzou; Marshall Stoller; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Variation in Radiologic and Urologic Computed Tomography Interpretation of Urinary Tract Stone Burden: Results From the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter.

Authors:  David T Tzou; Dylan Isaacson; Manint Usawachintachit; Zhen J Wang; Kazumi Taguchi; Nancy K Hills; Ryan S Hsi; Benjamin A Sherer; Shalonda Reliford-Titus; Brian Duty; Jonathan D Harper; Mathew Sorensen; Roger L Sur; Marshall L Stoller; Thomas Chi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Stone formation in patients less than 20 years of age is associated with higher rates of stone recurrence: Results from the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter (ReSKU).

Authors:  Yi Li; David Bayne; Scott Wiener; Justin Ahn; Marshall Stoller; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 1.830

9.  A nationwide registry for recurrent urolithiasis in the upper urinary tract - The RECUR study protocol.

Authors:  Martin Schoenthaler; Urs Alexander Fichtner; Martin Boeker; Daniela Zoeller; Harald Binder; Hans-Ulrich Prokosch; Friederike Praus; Tabea Walther; Maximilian Glienke; Petar Horki; Christian Gratzke; Erik Farin-Glattacker
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 2.908

10.  Low Urologist Density Predicts High-Cost Surgical Treatment of Stone Disease.

Authors:  David B Bayne; Manuel Armas-Phan; Sudarshan Srirangapatanam; Justin Ahn; Timothy T Brown; Marshall Stoller; Thomas L Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 2.942

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.