BACKGROUND: A logistic regression model (M4) was developed in the UK to predict the outcome for women with a pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) based on the initial two human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) values, 48 h apart. The purpose of this paper was to assess the utility of this model to predict the outcome for a woman (PUL) in a US population. METHODS: Diagnostic variables included log-transformed serum hCG average of two measurements, and linear and quadratic hCG ratios. Outcomes modeled were failing PUL, intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) and ectopic pregnancy (EP). This model was applied to a US cohort of 604 women presenting with symptomatic first-trimester pregnancies, who were followed until a definitive diagnosis was made. The model was applied before and after correcting for differences in terminology and diagnostic criteria. RESULTS: When retrospectively applied to the adjusted US population, the M4 model demonstrated lower areas under the curve compared with the UK population, 0.898 versus 0.988 for failing PUL/spontaneous miscarriage, 0.915 versus 0.981 for IUP and 0.831 versus 0.904 for EP. Whereas the model had 80% sensitivity for EP using UK data, this decreased to 49% for the US data, with similar specificities. Performance only improved slightly (55% sensitivity) when the US population was adjusted to better match the UK diagnostic criteria. CONCLUSIONS: A logistic regression model based on two hCG values performed with modest decreases in predictive ability in a US cohort for women at risk for EP compared with the original UK population. However, the sensitivity for EP was too low for the model to be used in clinical practice in its present form. Our data illustrate the difficulties of applying algorithms from one center to another, where the definitions of pathology may differ.
BACKGROUND: A logistic regression model (M4) was developed in the UK to predict the outcome for women with a pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) based on the initial two human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) values, 48 h apart. The purpose of this paper was to assess the utility of this model to predict the outcome for a woman (PUL) in a US population. METHODS: Diagnostic variables included log-transformed serum hCG average of two measurements, and linear and quadratic hCG ratios. Outcomes modeled were failing PUL, intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) and ectopic pregnancy (EP). This model was applied to a US cohort of 604 women presenting with symptomatic first-trimester pregnancies, who were followed until a definitive diagnosis was made. The model was applied before and after correcting for differences in terminology and diagnostic criteria. RESULTS: When retrospectively applied to the adjusted US population, the M4 model demonstrated lower areas under the curve compared with the UK population, 0.898 versus 0.988 for failing PUL/spontaneous miscarriage, 0.915 versus 0.981 for IUP and 0.831 versus 0.904 for EP. Whereas the model had 80% sensitivity for EP using UK data, this decreased to 49% for the US data, with similar specificities. Performance only improved slightly (55% sensitivity) when the US population was adjusted to better match the UK diagnostic criteria. CONCLUSIONS: A logistic regression model based on two hCG values performed with modest decreases in predictive ability in a US cohort for women at risk for EP compared with the original UK population. However, the sensitivity for EP was too low for the model to be used in clinical practice in its present form. Our data illustrate the difficulties of applying algorithms from one center to another, where the definitions of pathology may differ.
Authors: Beata E Seeber; Mary D Sammel; Wensheng Guo; Lan Zhou; Amy Hummel; Kurt T Barnhart Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2006-06-06 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: O Gevaert; F De Smet; E Kirk; B Van Calster; T Bourne; S Van Huffel; Y Moreau; D Timmerman; B De Moor; G Condous Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2006-04-06 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Kurt T Barnhart; Mary D Sammel; Paolo F Rinaudo; Lan Zhou; Amy C Hummel; Wensheng Guo Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Christopher B Morse; Mary D Sammel; Alka Shaunik; Lynne Allen-Taylor; Nicole L Oberfoell; Peter Takacs; Karine Chung; Kurt T Barnhart Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Kurt T Barnhart; Mary D Sammel; Peter Takacs; Karine Chung; Christopher B Morse; Katherine O'Flynn O'Brien; Lynne Allen-Taylor; Alka Shaunik Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Katherine E Dillon; Vasileios D Sioulas; Mary D Sammel; Karine Chung; Peter Takacs; Alka Shaunik; Kurt T Barnhart Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2012-07-12 Impact factor: 7.329