Literature DB >> 23246448

Biomarkers in reproductive medicine: the promise, and can it be fulfilled?

Stephen S Palmer1, Kurt T Barnhart.   

Abstract

A biomarker can be used for early diagnosis of a disease, identification of individuals for disease prevention, as a potential drug target, or as a potential marker for a drug response. A biomarker may also limit the use of drug (and therefore costs) to the population of patients for which the drug will be safe and efficacious. A biomarker in reproduction could be used to improve assessment of exposure, identify subgroups susceptible to treatment, predict outcome, and/or differentiate subgroups with potentially different etiologies of disease. Despite many potential uses there is low participation in reproductive biology to develop molecular biomarkers, which may be directly related to the low number of new molecular entities entering clinical trials. As the number of candidate markers in reproductive medicine is increasing, it is important to understand the pathway of development from discovery to clinical utility and recognize that the vast majority of potential markers will not be clinically useful, owing to a variety of pitfalls. Extensive testing, validation, and modification needs to be performed before a biomarker is demonstrated to have clinical utility. New opportunities and partnerships exist and should hasten the development of biomarkers in reproduction. As more biomarkers are moved into practice, a better-educated biomarker consumer will enhance the possibility that biomarker(s) will realize their great potential.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23246448      PMCID: PMC3602311          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  33 in total

Review 1.  Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  M S Pepe; R Etzioni; Z Feng; J D Potter; M L Thompson; M Thornquist; M Winget; Y Yasui
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Validation of biomarkers as early predictors of disease.

Authors:  S Bonassi; M Neri; R Puntoni
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet; Jeroen G Lijmer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; Lisa M McShane; Willi Sauerbrei; Sheila E Taube
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 5.  Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis.

Authors:  Richard O Burney; Linda C Giudice
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Evaluation of a panel of 28 biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.

Authors:  A Vodolazkaia; Y El-Aalamat; D Popovic; A Mihalyi; X Bossuyt; C M Kyama; A Fassbender; A Bokor; D Schols; D Huskens; C Meuleman; K Peeraer; C Tomassetti; O Gevaert; E Waelkens; A Kasran; B De Moor; T M D'Hooghe
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Incidence of endometriosis by study population and diagnostic method: the ENDO study.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; Mary L Hediger; C Matthew Peterson; Mary Croughan; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Joseph Stanford; Zhen Chen; Victor Y Fujimoto; Michael W Varner; Ann Trumble; Linda C Giudice
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Human endometrial CD98 is essential for blastocyst adhesion.

Authors:  Francisco Domínguez; Carlos Simón; Alicia Quiñonero; Miguel Ángel Ramírez; Elena González-Muñoz; Hans Burghardt; Ana Cervero; Sebastián Martínez; Antonio Pellicer; Manuel Palacín; Francisco Sánchez-Madrid; María Yáñez-Mó
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Consensus on women's health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): the Amsterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored 3rd PCOS Consensus Workshop Group.

Authors:  Bart C J M Fauser; Basil C Tarlatzis; Robert W Rebar; Richard S Legro; Adam H Balen; Roger Lobo; Enrico Carmina; Jeffrey Chang; Bulent O Yildiz; Joop S E Laven; Jacky Boivin; Felice Petraglia; C N Wijeyeratne; Robert J Norman; Andrea Dunaif; Stephen Franks; Robert A Wild; Daniel Dumesic; Kurt Barnhart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Assessment of leukemia inhibitory factor and glycoprotein 130 expression in endometrium and uterine flushing: a possible diagnostic tool for impaired fertility.

Authors:  Manal A Tawfeek; Manal A Eid; Azza M Hasan; Manal Mostafa; Hesham A El-Serogy
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.809

View more
  7 in total

1.  Molecular network analysis of endometriosis reveals a role for c-Jun-regulated macrophage activation.

Authors:  Michael T Beste; Nicole Pfäffle-Doyle; Emily A Prentice; Stephanie N Morris; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Keith B Isaacson; Linda G Griffith
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Evaluation, validation and refinement of noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers for endometriosis (ENDOmarker): A protocol to phenotype bio-specimens for discovery and validation.

Authors:  Kurt Barnhart; Linda Giudice; Steve Young; Tracey Thomas; Michael P Diamond; James Segars; Wahid A Youssef; Stephen Krawetz; Nanette Santoro; Esther Eisenberg; Heping Zhang
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Using the Eeva Test™ adjunctively to traditional day 3 morphology is informative for consistent embryo assessment within a panel of embryologists with diverse experience.

Authors:  Michael P Diamond; Vaishali Suraj; Erica J Behnke; Xinli Yang; Marlane J Angle; Jaclyn C Lambe-Steinmiller; Rachel Watterson; Kelly Athayde Wirka; Alice A Chen; Shehua Shen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Biomarkers identified with time-lapse imaging: discovery, validation, and practical application.

Authors:  Alice A Chen; Lei Tan; Vaishali Suraj; Renee Reijo Pera; Shehua Shen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Bringing epigenetics into the diagnostics of the andrology laboratory: challenges and perspectives.

Authors:  Ruth Kläver; Jörg Gromoll
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Technical Verification and Assessment of Independent Validation of Biomarker Models for Endometriosis.

Authors:  Dorien F O; Amelie Fassbender; Rita Van Bree; Annouschka Laenen; Daniëlle P Peterse; Arne Vanhie; Etienne Waelkens; Thomas M D'Hooghe
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Developing a deeper insight into reproductive biomarkers.

Authors:  Braira Wahid; Hamid Bashir; Muhammad Bilal; Khansa Wahid; Aleena Sumrin
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2017-12-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.