Literature DB >> 22192138

Performance of human chorionic gonadotropin curves in women at risk for ectopic pregnancy: exceptions to the rules.

Christopher B Morse1, Mary D Sammel, Alka Shaunik, Lynne Allen-Taylor, Nicole L Oberfoell, Peter Takacs, Karine Chung, Kurt T Barnhart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the accuracy of serial hCG to predict outcome of a pregnancy of unknown location in an ethnically and geographically diverse setting.
DESIGN: Multisite cohort study.
SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): Women with a pregnancy of unknown location. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Patients were followed until diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy (EP), intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), or miscarriage. To predict outcome, observed hCG level was compared with recommended thresholds to assess deviation from defined normal curves. Predicted outcome was compared with standard of care. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and accuracy were calculated, stratified by diagnosis. RESULT(S): The final diagnosis of 1,005 patients included 179 EPs, 259 IUPs, and 567 miscarriages. The optimal balance in sensitivity and specificity used the minimal expected 2-day increase in hCG level of 35%, and the minimal 2-day decrease in hCG level of 36%-47% (depending on the level) achieving 83.2% sensitivity, 70.8% specificity to predict EP. However, 16.8% of EPs and 7.7% of IUPs would be misclassified solely using serial hCG levels. Consideration of a third hCG and early ultrasound decreased IUP misclassification to 2.7%. CONCLUSION(S): Solely using serial hCG values can result in misclassification. Clinical judgment should trump prediction rules and continued surveillance with a third hCG may be prudent, especially when initial values are low or when values are near suggested thresholds.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22192138      PMCID: PMC3246395          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  21 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy with ultrasound.

Authors:  Emma Kirk; Tom Bourne
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.237

2.  Prediction of outcome in women with symptomatic first-trimester pregnancy: focus on intrauterine rather than ectopic gestation.

Authors:  Bruno C Casanova; Mary D Sammel; Jesse Chittams; Kelly Timbers; Jennifer L Kulp; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 3.  Clinical practice. Ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Expectant management of early pregnancies of unknown location: a prospective evaluation of methods to predict spontaneous resolution of pregnancy.

Authors:  S Banerjee; N Aslam; B Woelfer; A Lawrence; J Elson; D Jurkovic
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Clinical factors affecting the accuracy of ultrasonography in symptomatic first-trimester pregnancy.

Authors:  Kurt T Barnhart; Courtney A Fay; Maria Suescum; Mary D Sammel; Dina Appleby; Alka Shaunik; Anthony J Dean
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Pregnancy of unknown location: a consensus statement of nomenclature, definitions, and outcome.

Authors:  Kurt Barnhart; Norah M van Mello; Tom Bourne; Emma Kirk; Ben Van Calster; Cecilia Bottomley; Karine Chung; George Condous; Steven Goldstein; Petra J Hajenius; Ben Willem Mol; Thomas Molinaro; Katherine L O'Flynn O'Brien; Richard Husicka; Mary Sammel; Dirk Timmerman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Does a prediction model for pregnancy of unknown location developed in the UK validate on a US population?

Authors:  K T Barnhart; M D Sammel; D Appleby; M Rausch; T Molinaro; B Van Calster; E Kirk; G Condous; S Van Huffel; D Timmerman; T Bourne
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Clinical information does not improve the performance of mathematical models in predicting the outcome of pregnancies of unknown location.

Authors:  George Condous; Ben Van Calster; Emma Kirk; Zara Haider; Dirk Timmerman; Sabine Van Huffel; Tom Bourne
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Prediction of ectopic pregnancy in women with a pregnancy of unknown location.

Authors:  G Condous; B Van Calster; E Kirk; Z Haider; D Timmerman; S Van Huffel; T Bourne
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.299

10.  Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance--United States, 1991--1999.

Authors:  Jeani Chang; Laurie D Elam-Evans; Cynthia J Berg; Joy Herndon; Lisa Flowers; Kristi A Seed; Carla J Syverson
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2003-02-21
View more
  18 in total

1.  PURLs: is this pregnancy viable?

Authors:  Andrew H Slattengren; Shailendra Prasad; Sonia Oyola
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  The Role of Serum Beta hCG in Early Diagnosis and Management Strategy of Ectopic Pregnancy.

Authors:  Kameswari Surampudi; Sirisha Rao Gundabattula
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-07-01

3.  Ectopic pregnancy prediction in women with a pregnancy of unknown location: data beyond 48 h are necessary.

Authors:  J Zee; M D Sammel; K Chung; P Takacs; T Bourne; K T Barnhart
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Pregnancy of unknown location.

Authors:  Tal Milman; Melissa Walker; Jackie Thomas
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Biomarkers for ectopic pregnancy and pregnancy of unknown location.

Authors:  Suneeta Senapati; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Following declining human chorionic gonadotropin values in pregnancies of unknown location: when is it safe to stop?

Authors:  Katherine E Cameron; Suneeta Senapati; Mary D Sammel; Karine Chung; Peter Takacs; Thomas Molinaro; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Validation of a clinical risk scoring system, based solely on clinical presentation, for the management of pregnancy of unknown location.

Authors:  Kurt T Barnhart; Mary D Sammel; Peter Takacs; Karine Chung; Christopher B Morse; Katherine O'Flynn O'Brien; Lynne Allen-Taylor; Alka Shaunik
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Temporal refinement does not affect predicted human chorionic gonadotropin rise in early pregnancy.

Authors:  Andrew R Fisher; Mary D Sammel; Suneeta Senapati; Ashley Singer; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Differences in Serum Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Rise in Early Pregnancy by Race and Value at Presentation.

Authors:  Kurt T Barnhart; Wensheng Guo; Mark S Cary; Christopher B Morse; Karine Chung; Peter Takacs; Suneeta Senapati; Mary D Sammel
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 10.  Early pregnancy failure: beware of the pitfalls of modern management.

Authors:  Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.