BACKGROUND: As women present at earlier gestations to early pregnancy units (EPUs), the number of women diagnosed with a pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) increases. Some of these women will have an ectopic pregnancy (EP), and it is this group in the PUL population that poses the greatest concern. The aim of this study was to develop Bayesian networks to predict EPs in the PUL population. METHODS: Data were gathered in a single EPU from all women with a PUL. This data set was divided into a model-building (599 women with 44 EPs) and a validation (257 women with 22 EPs) data set and consisted of the following variables: vaginal bleeding, fluid in the pouch of Douglas, midline echo, lower abdominal pain, age, endometrial thickness, gestation days, the ratio of HCG at 48 and 0 h, progesterone levels (0 and 48 h) and the clinical outcome of the PUL. We developed Bayesian networks with expert information using this data set to predict EPs. RESULTS: The best Bayesian network used the gestational age, HCG ratio and the progesterone level at 48 h and had an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.88 for predicting EPs when tested prospectively. CONCLUSIONS: Discrete-valued Bayesian networks are more complex to build than, for example, logistic regression. Nevertheless, we have demonstrated that such models can be used to predict EPs in a PUL population. Prospective interventional multicentre studies are needed to validate the use of such models in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: As women present at earlier gestations to early pregnancy units (EPUs), the number of women diagnosed with a pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) increases. Some of these women will have an ectopic pregnancy (EP), and it is this group in the PUL population that poses the greatest concern. The aim of this study was to develop Bayesian networks to predict EPs in the PUL population. METHODS: Data were gathered in a single EPU from all women with a PUL. This data set was divided into a model-building (599 women with 44 EPs) and a validation (257 women with 22 EPs) data set and consisted of the following variables: vaginal bleeding, fluid in the pouch of Douglas, midline echo, lower abdominal pain, age, endometrial thickness, gestation days, the ratio of HCG at 48 and 0 h, progesterone levels (0 and 48 h) and the clinical outcome of the PUL. We developed Bayesian networks with expert information using this data set to predict EPs. RESULTS: The best Bayesian network used the gestational age, HCG ratio and the progesterone level at 48 h and had an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.88 for predicting EPs when tested prospectively. CONCLUSIONS: Discrete-valued Bayesian networks are more complex to build than, for example, logistic regression. Nevertheless, we have demonstrated that such models can be used to predict EPs in a PUL population. Prospective interventional multicentre studies are needed to validate the use of such models in clinical practice.
Authors: Bruno C Casanova; Mary D Sammel; Jesse Chittams; Kelly Timbers; Jennifer L Kulp; Kurt T Barnhart Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: S Bobdiwala; S Guha; B Van Calster; F Ayim; N Mitchell-Jones; M Al-Memar; H Mitchell; C Stalder; C Bottomley; A Kothari; D Timmerman; T Bourne Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Christopher B Morse; Mary D Sammel; Alka Shaunik; Lynne Allen-Taylor; Nicole L Oberfoell; Peter Takacs; Karine Chung; Kurt T Barnhart Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: K T Barnhart; M D Sammel; D Appleby; M Rausch; T Molinaro; B Van Calster; E Kirk; G Condous; S Van Huffel; D Timmerman; T Bourne Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2010-08-17 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Michel Ducher; Emilie Kalbacher; François Combarnous; Jérome Finaz de Vilaine; Brigitte McGregor; Denis Fouque; Jean Pierre Fauvel Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-11-17 Impact factor: 3.411