Literature DB >> 20715306

Risk-adjusted number-between failures charting procedures for monitoring a patient care process for acute myocardial infarctions.

Fah Fatt Gan1, Tess Tan.   

Abstract

Risk-adjusted charts for monitoring a surgical or patient care process have recently gained prominence in the literature. To monitor a patient care process, especially to detect deterioration is crucial in saving patients' lives. In this paper, a new charting procedure is developed for monitoring a patient care process for patients admitted to a hospital with acute myocardial infarctions. This procedure is based on the number-between failures by taking the patients' risks into account. When there is a change in the risk distribution of incoming patients, it is demonstrated that this procedure will behave properly while the non-risk-adjusted counterpart will signal incorrectly that the patient care process has changed. The setting up of this chart to monitor a patient care process for patients with acute myocardial infarctions is described in detail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20715306     DOI: 10.1007/s10729-010-9125-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci        ISSN: 1386-9620


  22 in total

1.  Number-between g-type statistical quality control charts for monitoring adverse events.

Authors:  J C Benneyan
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2001-12

2.  Monitoring cardiac surgical performance: a commentary.

Authors:  Tom Treasure; Stephen Gallivan; Chris Sherlaw-Johnson
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Monitoring clinical performance: a commentary.

Authors:  D J Spiegelhalter
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Risk-adjusted sequential probability ratio test control chart methods for monitoring operator and institutional mortality rates in interventional cardiology.

Authors:  Michael E Matheny; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Frederic S Resnic
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  A risk-adjusted CUSUM in continuous time based on the Cox model.

Authors:  Pinaki Biswas; John D Kalbfleisch
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Direct comparison of risk-adjusted and non-risk-adjusted CUSUM analyses of coronary artery bypass surgery outcomes.

Authors:  Richard J Novick; Stephanie A Fox; Larry W Stitt; Thomas L Forbes; Stefan Steiner
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  The use of patient mix-adjusted control charts to compare in-hospital costs of care.

Authors:  E L Eisenstein; C F Bethea
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  1999-12

8.  The risks of risk adjustment.

Authors:  L I Iezzoni
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-11-19       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Cumulative risk adjusted mortality chart for detecting changes in death rate: observational study of heart surgery.

Authors:  J Poloniecki; O Valencia; P Littlejohns
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-06

10.  Risk-adjusted sequential probability ratio tests: applications to Bristol, Shipman and adult cardiac surgery.

Authors:  David Spiegelhalter; Olivia Grigg; Robin Kinsman; Tom Treasure
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.038

View more
  1 in total

1.  Modeling the patient mix for risk-adjusted CUSUM charts.

Authors:  Philipp Wittenberg
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 2.494

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.