Literature DB >> 35139722

Modeling the patient mix for risk-adjusted CUSUM charts.

Philipp Wittenberg1.   

Abstract

The improvement of surgical quality and the corresponding early detection of its changes is of increasing importance. To this end, sequential monitoring procedures such as the risk-adjusted CUmulative SUM chart are frequently applied. The patient risk score population (patient mix), which considers the patients' perioperative risk, is a core component for this type of quality control chart. Consequently, it is important to be able to adapt different shapes of patient mixes and determine their impact on the monitoring scheme. This article proposes a framework for modeling the patient mix by a discrete beta-binomial and a continuous beta distribution for risk-adjusted CUSUM charts. Since the model-based approach is not limited by data availability, any patient mix can be analyzed. We examine the effects on the control chart's false alarm behavior for more than 100,000 different scenarios for a cardiac surgery data set. Our study finds a negative relationship between the average risk score and the number of false alarms. The results indicate that a changing patient mix has a considerable impact and, in some cases, almost doubles the number of expected false alarms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Average run length; Parsonnet score; probability distribution; quality control charts; statistical process control

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35139722      PMCID: PMC9014690          DOI: 10.1177/09622802211053205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   2.494


  23 in total

1.  A Bayesian approach to risk-adjusted outcome monitoring in healthcare.

Authors:  L Zeng; S Zhou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Monitoring the results of cardiac surgery by variable life-adjusted display.

Authors:  J Lovegrove; O Valencia; T Treasure; C Sherlaw-Johnson; S Gallivan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-10-18       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Risk-adjusted CUSUM charts under model error.

Authors:  Sven Knoth; Philipp Wittenberg; Fah Fatt Gan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Dynamic probability control limits for risk-adjusted Bernoulli CUSUM charts.

Authors:  Xiang Zhang; William H Woodall
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  A new risk-adjusted Bernoulli cumulative sum chart for monitoring binary health data.

Authors:  Giuseppe Rossi; Simone Del Sarto; Marco Marchi
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  A new sequential procedure for surveillance of Down's syndrome.

Authors:  R T Lie; I Heuch; L M Irgens
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1993-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Assessing the effect of estimation error on risk-adjusted CUSUM chart performance.

Authors:  Mark A Jones; Stefan H Steiner
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.038

8.  Use of risk-adjusted CUSUM and RSPRT charts for monitoring in medical contexts.

Authors:  O A Grigg; V T Farewell; D J Spiegelhalter
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  Monitoring surgical performance using risk-adjusted cumulative sum charts.

Authors:  S H Steiner; R J Cook; V T Farewell; T Treasure
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 10.  Risk assessment methods for cardiac surgery and intervention.

Authors:  Nassir M Thalji; Rakesh M Suri; Kevin L Greason; Hartzell V Schaff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 32.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.