Literature DB >> 9614015

Cumulative risk adjusted mortality chart for detecting changes in death rate: observational study of heart surgery.

J Poloniecki1, O Valencia, P Littlejohns.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To detect changes in mortality after surgery, with allowance being made for variations in case mix.
DESIGN: Observational study of postoperative mortality from January 1992 to August 1995.
SETTING: Regional cardiothoracic unit.
SUBJECTS: 3983 patients aged 16 and over who had open heart operations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative risk factors and postoperative mortality in hospital within 30 days were recorded for all surgical heart operations. Mortality was adjusted for case mix using a preoperative estimate of risk based on additive Parsonnet factors. The number of operations required for statistical power to detect a doubling of mortality was examined, and control limits at a nominal significance level of P=0.01 for detection of an adverse trend were determined.
RESULTS: Total mortality of 7.0% was 26% below the Parsonnet predictor (P<0.0001). There was a highly significant variation in annual case mix (Parsonnet scores 8.7-10.6, P<0.0001). There was no significant variation in mortality after adjustment for case mix (odds ratio 1-1.5, P=0.18) with monitoring by calendar year. With continuous monitoring, however, nominal 99% control limits based on 16 expected deaths were crossed on two occasions.
CONCLUSIONS: Hospital league tables for mortality from heart surgery will be of limited value because year to year differences in death rate can be large (odds ratio 1.5) even when the underlying risk or case mix does not change. Statistical quality control of a single series with adjustment for case mix is the only way to take into account recent performance when informing a patient of the risk of surgery at a particular hospital. If there is an increase in the number of deaths the chances of the next patient surviving surgery can be calculated from the last 16 deaths.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9614015      PMCID: PMC28566          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.316.7146.1697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  12 in total

1.  Monitoring the results of cardiac surgery by variable life-adjusted display.

Authors:  J Lovegrove; O Valencia; T Treasure; C Sherlaw-Johnson; S Gallivan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-10-18       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Relation of operator volume and experience to procedural outcome of percutaneous coronary revascularization at hospitals with high interventional volumes.

Authors:  S G Ellis; W Weintraub; D Holmes; R Shaw; P C Block; S B King
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-06-03       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  The performance of doctors. II: Maintaining good practice, protecting patients from poor performance.

Authors:  D Irvine
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-05-31

4.  Human factors and surgical outcomes: a Cartesian dream.

Authors:  M R de Leval
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-03-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Measuring outcomes: one month survival after acute myocardial infarction in Scotland.

Authors:  S Capewell; S Kendrick; J Boyd; G Cohen; E Juszczak; J Clarke
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Risk-adjusted analysis of surgeon performance: a 1-year study.

Authors:  G P Copeland; P Sagar; J Brennan; G Roberts; J Ward; P Cornford; A Millar; C Harris
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  How a New York cardiac surgery program uses outcomes data.

Authors:  S W Dziuban; J B McIlduff; S J Miller; R H Dal Col
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  A method of uniform stratification of risk for evaluating the results of surgery in acquired adult heart disease.

Authors:  V Parsonnet; D Dean; A D Bernstein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Differences in mortality after fracture of hip: the east Anglian audit.

Authors:  C J Todd; C J Freeman; C Camilleri-Ferrante; C R Palmer; A Hyder; C E Laxton; M J Parker; B V Payne; N Rushton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-04-08

10.  Variation in outcome after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. The National Audit of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage.

Authors:  T A Rockall; R F Logan; H B Devlin; T C Northfield
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-08-05       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  32 in total

1.  Likely variations in perioperative mortality associated with cardiac surgery: when does high mortality reflect bad practice?

Authors:  C Sherlaw-Johnson; J Lovegrove; T Treasure; S Gallivan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Assessing operative skill. Needs to become more objective.

Authors:  A Darzi; S Smith; N Taffinder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-03

3.  Mortality control charts for comparing performance of surgical units: validation study using hospital mortality data.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Peter McCulloch; Adrian C Steger; Irving S Benjamin; Jan D Poloniecki
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-12

4.  Surgical performance measurement.

Authors:  Tom Treasure; Oswaldo Valencia; Chris Sherlaw-Johnson; Steve Gallivan
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2002-11

Review 5.  Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions.

Authors:  Peter McCulloch; Irving Taylor; Mitsuru Sasako; Bryony Lovett; Damian Griffin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-15

6.  Risk-adjustment in hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Hemant M Kocher; Paris P Tekkis; Palepu Gopal; Ameet G Patel; Simon Cottam; Irving S Benjamin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Quality control of surgical and interventional procedures: a review of the CUSUM.

Authors:  David J Biau; Mathieu Resche-Rigon; Gaëlle Godiris-Petit; Rémy S Nizard; Raphaël Porcher
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-06

8.  How to improve surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Peter J E Holt; Jan D Poloniecki; Matt M Thompson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-21

9.  Public confidence and cardiac surgical outcome. Cardiac surgery: the fall guy in medical quality assurance.

Authors:  B E Keogh; J Dussek; D Watson; P Magee; D Wheatley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-13

10.  CUSUM analysis of J-pouch surgery reflects no learning curve after board certification.

Authors:  Patrick H D Colquhoun
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.