Literature DB >> 20714738

An enhanced recovery programme reduces length of stay after rectal surgery.

Graham Branagan1, Lynn Richardson, Archana Shetty, Helen S Chave.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Enhanced Recovery Programmes (ERP) result in shorter hospital stay after colonic resection with no increase in complication, mortality or readmission rates. There is little data regarding the use of an ERP after rectal resection. We investigated the effect of introducing laparoscopic surgery and the ERP on outcomes in our unit.
METHODS: From February 2007, elective patients undergoing rectal resection (laparoscopic or open) under the care of two colorectal surgeons were placed into the ERP. Length of stay (LOS) was recorded as total LOS, including readmissions. Comparison was made with a cohort of patients from 2004-2005 before the onset of laparoscopic surgery/ERP.
RESULTS: Forty patients in the ERP group were compared with 42 patients from 2004-2005. Morbidity and mortality rates were similar. LOS was shorter in the ERP group cf. the retrospective group (median 7 days vs. 11 days; p=0.002). Median LOS was shorter in both laparoscopic ERP patients (6 days cf. 11 days; p= 0.004) and open ERP patients (7 days cf. 11 days; p=0.014) cf. the retrospective group.
CONCLUSION: Patients having rectal resections benefit from a multimodal approach to surgery with significant reductions in LOS, but no change in morbidity or mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20714738     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-010-1032-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  12 in total

1.  Readmission rates after a planned hospital stay of 2 versus 3 days in fast-track colonic surgery.

Authors:  J Andersen; D Hjort-Jakobsen; P S Christiansen; H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection.

Authors:  J Maessen; C H C Dejong; J Hausel; J Nygren; K Lassen; J Andersen; A G H Kessels; A Revhaug; H Kehlet; O Ljungqvist; K C H Fearon; M F von Meyenfeldt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  "Fast-track" rehabilitation after rectal cancer resection.

Authors:  W Schwenk; J Neudecker; W Raue; O Haase; J M Müller
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  ["Fast-Track" for laparoscopic-assisted rectum resection--what can be achieved? First results of a feasibility study].

Authors:  H Spatz; C Zülke; A Beham; A Agha; U Bolder; D Krenz; A Fürst; R Lattermann; G Gröppner; B Hemmerich; P Piso; H Schlitt
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.942

7.  Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Antonio M Lacy; Juan C García-Valdecasas; Salvadora Delgado; Antoni Castells; Pilar Taurá; Josep M Piqué; Josep Visa
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-29       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Impact of conversion on surgical outcomes after laparoscopic operation for rectal carcinoma: a retrospective study of 1,073 patients.

Authors:  Seiichiro Yamamoto; Masaki Fukunaga; Nobuyoshi Miyajima; Junji Okuda; Fumio Konishi; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Laparoscopic rectal resections and fast-track surgery: what can be expected?

Authors:  Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo; Bradley Champagne; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Conversion rate in 300 laparoscopic rectal resections and its influence on morbidity and oncological outcome.

Authors:  A Agha; A Fürst; I Iesalnieks; S Fichtner-Feigl; N Ghali; D Krenz; M Anthuber; K W Jauch; P Piso; H J Schlitt
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  8 in total

1.  Enhanced recovery strategies in colorectal surgery: is the compliance with the whole program required to achieve the target?

Authors:  Luca Gianotti; Simone Beretta; Margherita Luperto; Davide Bernasconi; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Marco Braga
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations.

Authors:  J Nygren; J Thacker; F Carli; K C H Fearon; S Norderval; D N Lobo; O Ljungqvist; M Soop; J Ramirez
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Unselected rectal cancer patients undergoing low anterior resection with defunctioning ileostomy can be safely managed within an Enhanced Recovery Programme.

Authors:  B E Byrne; G Branagan; H S Chave
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Impact of fast-track care program in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a cohort-comparative study.

Authors:  Hélène Meillat; Victor Serenon; Clément Brun; Cécile de Chaisemartin; Marion Faucher; Bernard Lelong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 5.  Incomplete reporting of enhanced recovery elements and its impact on achieving quality improvement.

Authors:  Vijaya Gottumukkala; Thomas A Aloia; Ryan W Day; Sharon Fielder; John Calhoun; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Best practice in major elective rectal/pelvic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS).

Authors:  Josefin Segelman; Jonas Nygren
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-10-24

7.  Volume-outcome relationship in rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  L Siragusa; B Sensi; D Vinci; M Franceschilli; C Pathirannehalage Don; G Bagaglini; V Bellato; M Campanelli; G S Sica
Journal:  Discov Oncol       Date:  2021-04-12

8.  Improving postoperative outcome in rectal cancer surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in an era of increasing laparoscopic resection.

Authors:  Nathalie Bakker; Hiëronymus J Doodeman; Michalda S Dunker; Wilhelmina H Schreurs; Alexander P J Houdijk
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.445

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.