Literature DB >> 22936593

Unselected rectal cancer patients undergoing low anterior resection with defunctioning ileostomy can be safely managed within an Enhanced Recovery Programme.

B E Byrne1, G Branagan, H S Chave.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An increasing body of evidence supports the application of the Enhanced Recovery Programme (ERP) to colorectal surgery. Some institutions have reported an association between ERP failure and low rectal cancer surgery. We present the results that we achieved by applying the ERP to low anterior resections for tumours within 6 cm of the anal verge, with a view to determining the validity and safety of applying the ERP to this patient group.
METHODS: A multimodal ERP, based on Kehlet's model, was introduced in January 2007 and applied to all patients undergoing elective resections. Patients having a low anterior resection for a rectal cancer less than 6 cm from the anal verge between January 2007 and August 2011 were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database. Individual patient record review was performed.
RESULTS: Twenty consecutive patients (12 males) were identified. Median total postoperative length of stay (LOS), including readmission, was 8 days (mean 10.7, range 4-47 days), with 2 readmissions and no deaths. When surgery was uncomplicated, median LOS was 5 days (mean 5.8, range 4-12 days, n = 11), whereas LOS increased when a complication occurred, with a median of 12 days (mean 16.6, range 8-47 days, n = 9) [p = 0.001].
CONCLUSIONS: The ERP can safely be applied to this high-risk patient group. When no complication occurs, LOS of 5 days can be expected. When a complication is encountered, LOS is prolonged (12 days), but this is acceptable compared with the current national median LOS in the United Kingdom of 11 days for all rectal cancer surgery (at any height) with a stoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22936593     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-012-0886-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  14 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  W S Tan; C L Tang; L Shi; K W Eu
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Nuh N Rahbari; Jürgen Weitz; Werner Hohenberger; Richard J Heald; Brendan Moran; Alexis Ulrich; Torbjörn Holm; W Douglas Wong; Emmanuel Tiret; Yoshihiro Moriya; Søren Laurberg; Marcel den Dulk; Cornelis van de Velde; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision can be performed on a nonselective basis in patients with rectal cancer with excellent medium-term results.

Authors:  D G Glancy; B N Chaudhray; G L Greenslade; A R Dixon
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.788

4.  Is it appropriate to apply the enhanced recovery program to patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal surgery?

Authors:  Chien-Chih Chen; I-Ping Huang; Mei-Ching Liu; James Jer-Min Jian; Skye Hon-Chun Cheng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Enhanced recovery after surgery versus conventional perioperative care in rectal surgery.

Authors:  Pascal H E Teeuwen; Robert P Bleichrodt; Paul J M de Jong; Harry van Goor; Andre J A Bremers
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  [Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer].

Authors:  Chao Feng; Ruo-quan Yao; Fei-zhou Huang; Wan-pin Nie; Xun-yang Liu
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2011-05

7.  Ileostomy formation does not prolong hospital length of stay after open anterior resection when performed within an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  S Hignett; C D Parmar; W Lewis; C A Makin; C J Walsh
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  Pathogenesis of morbidity after fast-track laparoscopic colonic cancer surgery.

Authors:  S Stottmeier; H Harling; P Wille-Jørgensen; L Balleby; H Kehlet
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 9.  Predicting the risk and diminishing the consequences of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  B J Moran
Journal:  Acta Chir Iugosl       Date:  2010

10.  An enhanced recovery programme reduces length of stay after rectal surgery.

Authors:  Graham Branagan; Lynn Richardson; Archana Shetty; Helen S Chave
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Overall readmissions and readmissions related to dehydration after creation of an ileostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  I Vogel; M Shinkwin; S L van der Storm; J Torkington; J A Cornish; P J Tanis; R Hompes; W A Bemelman
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.699

2.  Improving postoperative outcome in rectal cancer surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in an era of increasing laparoscopic resection.

Authors:  Nathalie Bakker; Hiëronymus J Doodeman; Michalda S Dunker; Wilhelmina H Schreurs; Alexander P J Houdijk
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.445

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.