Literature DB >> 19245924

Laparoscopic rectal resections and fast-track surgery: what can be expected?

Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo1, Bradley Champagne, Conor P Delaney.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We present the results of combining protocols of standardized laparoscopic rectal resection (LRR) and perioperative fast track care.
METHODS: Patients undergoing LRRs were identified from a prospectively maintained, institutional review board-approved database. Perioperative fast track care and laparoscopic operations were performed according to a standardized system.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were included. Conversion was performed in 2 males (5%). The mean operative time was 184 minutes (range 109 to 410 minutes). The mean hospital stay was 3.0 days (range 1 to 8 days) with 90% of patients discharged less than 5 days after surgery. No anastomotic leaks or mortality occurred and the in-hospital complications rate was 8%. Readmission occurred in 3 patients (8%). No specimen had involved distal or circumferential resection margins.
CONCLUSIONS: LRRs can be performed safely and effectively for rectal pathologies. Laparoscopy in conjunction with modern perioperative care provides rapid recovery with efficient use of hospital resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19245924     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  15 in total

1.  A standardized technique for laparoscopic rectal resection.

Authors:  Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Current perioperative practice in rectal surgery in Austria and Germany.

Authors:  Till Hasenberg; Friedrich Längle; Bianca Reibenwein; Karin Schindler; Stefan Post; Claudia Spies; Wolfgang Schwenk; Edward Shang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: are we there yet?

Authors:  Bradley J Champagne; Rohit Makhija
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Does an enhanced recovery programme add value to laparoscopic colorectal resections?

Authors:  P K Dhruva Rao; S Howells; P N Haray
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway vs traditional care in laparoscopic rectal resection: a single-center experience.

Authors:  A Vignali; U Elmore; A Cossu; M Lemma; B Calì; P de Nardi; R Rosati
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Newly implemented enhanced recovery pathway positively impacts hospital length of stay.

Authors:  Thomas D Martin; Talya Lorenz; Jane Ferraro; Kevin Chagin; Richard M Lampman; Karen L Emery; Joan E Zurkan; Jami L Boyd; Karin Montgomery; Rachel E Lang; James F Vandewarker; Robert K Cleary
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Integration of open and laparoscopic approaches for rectal cancer resection: oncologic and short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Ki-Jae Park; Knut-Magne Augestad; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  M Adamina; C P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Minilaparotomy to rectal cancer has higher overall survival rate and earlier short-term recovery.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Wang; Ming-Jun Huang; Chuan-Hua Yang; Ka Li; Li Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Early rehabilitation versus conventional care after laparoscopic rectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Sung-Min Lee; Sung-Bum Kang; Je-Ho Jang; Jun-Seok Park; Samin Hong; Taek-Gu Lee; Soyeon Ahn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.